Milan v. Rama et al

Filing 41

ORDER DIRECTING DEFENDANT SANDHU TO SUBMIT CHAMBERS COPY OF DOCUMENTS IN COMPLIANCE WITH CIVIL LOCAL RULES AND THE COURT'S STANDING ORDERS. Signed by Judge Maxine M. Chesney on September 17, 2013. (mmclc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/17/2013)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA For the Northern District of California United States District Court 10 11 REBECCA MILAN, Plaintiff, 12 13 14 15 16 No. C-13-3796 MMC ORDER DIRECTING DEFENDANT SANDHU TO SUBMIT CHAMBERS COPY OF DOCUMENTS IN COMPLIANCE WITH CIVIL LOCAL RULES AND THE COURT’S STANDING ORDERS v. ANITA KOTAMRAJU, M.D., et al., Defendants. / 17 18 On September 9, 2013, defendant Anahat Sandhu, M.D., electronically filed her 19 response to plaintiff’s motion to remand, as well as a request for judicial notice. Defendant 20 has violated the Civil Local Rules of this District and the Court’s Standing Orders, however, 21 by failing “to provide for chambers a paper copy of each document that is electronically filed 22 . . . marked ‘Chambers Copy’.” See Civil L.R. 5-1(e)(7); see also Standing Orders For Civil 23 Cases Assigned to The Honorable Maxine M. Chesney ¶ 2. 24 Defendant is hereby ORDERED to comply with Civil Local Rule 5-1(e)(7) and the 25 Court’s Standing Orders by immediately submitting a chambers copy of the above- 26 referenced documents. Defendant is hereby advised that if she fails in the future to comply 27 with the Court’s Standing Orders to provide a chambers copy of each electronically-filed 28 document, the Court may impose sanctions, including, but not limited to, striking from the 1 record any electronically-filed document of which a chambers copy has not been timely 2 provided to the Court. 3 IT IS SO ORDERED. 4 5 Dated: September 17, 2013 MAXINE M. CHESNEY United States District Judge 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?