Milan v. Rama et al
Filing
41
ORDER DIRECTING DEFENDANT SANDHU TO SUBMIT CHAMBERS COPY OF DOCUMENTS IN COMPLIANCE WITH CIVIL LOCAL RULES AND THE COURT'S STANDING ORDERS. Signed by Judge Maxine M. Chesney on September 17, 2013. (mmclc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/17/2013)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
For the Northern District of California
United States District Court
10
11
REBECCA MILAN,
Plaintiff,
12
13
14
15
16
No. C-13-3796 MMC
ORDER DIRECTING DEFENDANT
SANDHU TO SUBMIT CHAMBERS
COPY OF DOCUMENTS IN
COMPLIANCE WITH CIVIL LOCAL
RULES AND THE COURT’S STANDING
ORDERS
v.
ANITA KOTAMRAJU, M.D., et al.,
Defendants.
/
17
18
On September 9, 2013, defendant Anahat Sandhu, M.D., electronically filed her
19
response to plaintiff’s motion to remand, as well as a request for judicial notice. Defendant
20
has violated the Civil Local Rules of this District and the Court’s Standing Orders, however,
21
by failing “to provide for chambers a paper copy of each document that is electronically filed
22
. . . marked ‘Chambers Copy’.” See Civil L.R. 5-1(e)(7); see also Standing Orders For Civil
23
Cases Assigned to The Honorable Maxine M. Chesney ¶ 2.
24
Defendant is hereby ORDERED to comply with Civil Local Rule 5-1(e)(7) and the
25
Court’s Standing Orders by immediately submitting a chambers copy of the above-
26
referenced documents. Defendant is hereby advised that if she fails in the future to comply
27
with the Court’s Standing Orders to provide a chambers copy of each electronically-filed
28
document, the Court may impose sanctions, including, but not limited to, striking from the
1
record any electronically-filed document of which a chambers copy has not been timely
2
provided to the Court.
3
IT IS SO ORDERED.
4
5
Dated: September 17, 2013
MAXINE M. CHESNEY
United States District Judge
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?