Curley v. Wells Fargo & Company et al

Filing 127

ORDER PERMITTING PLAINTIFF TO FILE OBJECTION OR RESPONSE TO EVIDENCE IN DOCKET NUMBERS 125 , [126-1]. Signed by Judge Nathanael Cousins on 7/7/2015. (lmh, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/7/2015)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

10

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

11
12
13

DAVID M. CURLEY, SR.,
Plaintiff,

14
15
16
17

v.

Case No. 13-cv-03805 NC
ORDER PERMITTING PLAINTIFF
TO FILE OBJECTION OR
RESPONSE TO EVIDENCE IN
DOCKET NUMBERS 125, 126-1

WELLS FARGO & CO., and others,
Re: Dkt. Nos. 125, 126-1
Defendants.

18
19

With its reply brief, Wells Fargo has submitted additional evidence in support of its

20 summary judgment motion. Dkt. No. 125 (exhibit “inadvertently left off” initial motion);
21 Dkt. No. 126-1 (supplemental declaration of E. Manukyan). Plaintiff David Curley may
22 object or respond to this evidence by July 13 in a brief not to exceed three pages in length.
23

IT IS SO ORDERED.

24

Date: July 7, 2015

25

_________________________
Nathanael M. Cousins
United States Magistrate Judge

26
27
28
Case No. 13-cv-03805 NC
ORDER PERMITTING RESPONSE