O'Connor et al v. Uber Technologies, Inc. et al

Filing 133

STIPULATION AND ORDER re 132 STIPULATION TO CONTINUE OCT 9 DEADLINE FOR DEFENDANT TO FILE MOTION(S) FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT filed by Uber Technologies, Inc. Responses due by 11/6/2014. Replies due by 11/26/2014. Motion Hearing set for 12/18/2014 01:30 PM in Courtroom 5, 17th Floor, San Francisco before Hon. Edward M. Chen. Signed by Judge Edward Chen on 8/15/2014. (knm, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/18/2014) Modified on 8/18/2014 (knm, COURT STAFF).

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17

ROBERT JON HENDRICKS, State Bar No. 179751
STEPHEN L. TAEUSCH, State Bar No. 247708
CAITLIN V. MAY (SBN 293141)
MORGAN, LEWIS & BOCKIUS LLP
One Market Street, Spear Street Tower
San Francisco, California 94105-1126
Tel: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
[e-mail]
[e-mail]
[e-mail]
Attorneys for Defendant
UBER TECHNOLOGIES, INC.
SHANNON LISS-RIORDAN, pro hac vice
([e-mail])
LICHTEN & LISS-RIORDAN, P.C.
100 Cambridge Street, 20th Floor
Boston, MA 02114
Telephone:
[phone]
Facsimile:
[phone]
MONIQUE OLIVIER (SBN 190385)
([e-mail])
DUCKWORTH, PETERS, LEBOWITZ, OLIVIER LLP
100 Bush Street, Suite 1800
San Francisco, CA 94104
Telephone:
[phone]
Facsimile:
[phone]
Attorneys for Plaintiffs
DOUGLAS O’CONNOR and THOMAS COLOPY

18

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

19
20
21
22
23

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
DOUGLAS O’CONNOR, THOMAS
COLOPY, DAVID KHAN, MATTHEW
MANAHAN, WILSON ROLLE, JR., and
WILLIAM ANDERSON, individually and
on behalf of all others similarly situated,
Plaintiffs,

24
25
26

v.

Case No. CV 13-03826-EMC
[PROPOSED] ORDER CONTINUING
OCTOBER 9, 2014 DEADLINE FOR
DEFENDANT TO FILE MOTION(S) FOR
SUMMARY JUDGMENT
Complaint Filed:

August 16, 2013

UBER TECHNOLOGIES, INC.,
Defendant.

27
28

[PROPOSED] ORDER CONTINUING
MSJ FILING DEADLINE
(CASE NO. CV 13-03826-EMC)
DB2/ 25272927.2

1
2

[PROPOSED] ORDER
The Parties’ requested continuance of the October 9, 2014 deadline for Defendant to file

3

its Motion(s) for Summary Judgment to October 16, 2014 is hereby GRANTED. Plaintiffs’

4

opposition is due on or before November 6, 2014, Defendant’s reply is due on or before

5

November 26, 2014, and the hearing remains set for December 18, 2014 at 1:30 p.m.

6

PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED.

7
8

August 15, 2014
Dated: _______________________________

_______________________________
HON. EDWARD M. CHEN
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
1

DB2/ 25272927.2

[PROPOSED] ORDER CONTINUING
MSJ FILING DEADLINE
(CASE NO. CV 13-03826-EMC)