O'Connor et al v. Uber Technologies, Inc. et al

Filing 218

STIPULATION AND ORDER re 217 STIPULATION WITH PROPOSED ORDER To Extend The Deadline To File Plaintiffs' Opposition to Defendant's Motion for Summary Judgment and Defendant's Reply Brief by One Day filed by Thomas Colopy, Elie Gurfinkel, Matthew Manahan, Douglas O'Connor. Signed by Judge Edward M. Chen on 12/19/14. (bpf, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 12/19/2014)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7

ROBERT JON HENDRICKS, State Bar No. 179751
STEPHEN L. TAEUSCH, State Bar No. 247708
CAITLIN V. MAY State Bar No. 293141
MORGAN, LEWIS & BOCKIUS LLP
One Market Street, Spear Street Tower
San Francisco, California 94105-1126
Tel: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
[e-mail]
[e-mail]
[e-mail]
Attorneys for Defendant
UBER TECHNOLOGIES, INC.

8
9
10
11

SHANNON LISS-RIORDAN, pro hac vice
LICHTEN & LISS-RIORDAN, P.C.
729 Boylston Street, Suite 2000
Boston, MA 02116
Telephone:
[phone]
Facsimile:
[phone]
[e-mail]

12
13
14
15
16
17

MATTHEW CARLSON, State Bar No. 273242
Carlson Legal Services
100 Pine Street, Suite 1250
San Francisco, CA 94111
Telephone:
[phone]
[e-mail]
Attorneys for Plaintiffs
DOUGLAS O’CONNOR, THOMAS COLOPY,
MATTHEW MANAHAN, and ELIE GURFINKEL

18

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

19

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

20
21
22

DOUGLAS O’CONNOR, THOMAS
COLOPY, MATTHEW MANAHAN, and
ELIE GURFINKEL, individually and on
behalf of all others similarly situated,

23

Plaintiffs,

24
25

v.

Case No. CV 13-03826-EMC
JOINT STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED]
ORDER GRANTING LEAVE TO EXTEND
THE DEADLINE TO FILE PLAINTIFFS’
OPPOSITION TO DEFENDANT’S
MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT
AND DEFENDANT’S REPLY BY ONE
DAY

UBER TECHNOLOGIES, INC.,

26

Defendant.

27

Date:
Time:
Location:
Judge:

January 29, 2015
1:30 pm
Courtroom 5
The Honorable Edward M. Chen

28
STIP. TO EXTEND DEADLINE TO FILE PLAINTIFFS’ OPPOSITION AND DEFENDANT’S REPLY BRIEFS
BY ONE DAY EACH (CASE NO. CV 13-03826-EMC)
DB2/ 25497475.1

1

Plaintiffs Douglas O’Connor, Thomas Colopy, Matthew Manahan, and, Elie Gurfinkel

2

(“Plaintiffs”) and Defendant Uber Technologies, Inc. (“Defendant”) (collectively, the “Parties”),

3

by and through their respective counsel of record, hereby stipulate and agree as follows:

4

WHEREAS, Plaintiffs’ Opposition to Defendant’s Motion for Summary Judgment is

5

currently due on December 29, 2014, in the midst of the holiday season and Plaintiffs’ counsel’s

6

travel plans could be accommodated by filing Plaintiffs’ Opposition and accompanying

7

documents one day later on December 30, 2014;

8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17

WHEREAS, in the interest of fairness, Defendant should receive an additional day to
prepare its Reply brief, which is currently due on January 8, 2015,
WHEREAS, the parties believe that a one-day delay will not interfere with the Court’s
review of the briefing in this case prior to the scheduled hearing date of January 29, 2015;
IT IS THEREFORE STIPULATED AND AGREED, by and between Plaintiffs and
Defendant, acting through their respective counsel, subject to this Court’s approval, as follows:
Plaintiffs’ Memorandum of law in Opposition to Defendant’s Motion for Summary
Judgment shall be filed on December 30, 2014.
Defendant’s Reply brief in support of its Motion for Summary Judgment shall be filed on
January 9, 2015.

18
19

Dated: December 18, 2014

LICHTEN & LISS-RIORDAN, P.C.

20

By:

21
22

Dated: December 18, 2014

/s/ Shannon Liss-Riordan
Shannon Liss-Riordan
Attorneys for Plaintiffs

MORGAN, LEWIS & BOCKIUS LLP

23

By: /s/ Robert Jon Hendricks
Robert Jon Hendricks
Attorneys for Defendant

24
25
26
27
28
1
DB2/ 25497475.1

STIP. TO EXTEND DEADLINES BY ONE
DAY
(CASE NO. CV 13-03826-EMC)

PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED.

2

RT

7

dwa
Judge E

ER

H

8
9

Honorable Edward M. Chen
United States District Judge

hen

rd M. C

NO

6

R NIA

5

___________________________________
ERED

O ORD
IT IS S

FO

4

LI

UNIT
ED

S

12/19
Dated: ________________, 2014

RT
U
O

3

S DISTRICT
TE
C
TA

A

1

N

F
D IS T IC T O
R

C

10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
DB2/ 25497475.1

STIP. TO EXTEND DEADLINES BY ONE
DAY
(CASE NO. CV 13-03826-EMC)

1
ECF ATTESTATION
2
3
4
5
6

I, Shannon Liss-Riordan, am the ECF User whose ID and Password are being used to file
this JOINT STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING LEAVE TO EXTEND
THE DEADLINE TO FILE PLAINTIFFS’ OPPOSITION TO DEFENDANT’S MOTION FOR
SUMMARY JUDGMENT AND DEFENDANT’S REPLY BY ONE DAY. In compliance with
General Order 45 X.B, I hereby attest that Robert Jon Hendricks has concurred in this filing.

7
8
Dated: December 18, 2014

LICHTEN & LISS-RIORDAN, P.C.

9
10
11

By /s/ Shannon Liss-Riordan
Shannon Liss-Riordan

12

Attorney for Plaintiffs

13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
3
DB2/ 25497475.1

STIP. TO EXTEND DEADLINES BY ONE
DAY
(CASE NO. CV 13-03826-EMC)