O'Connor et al v. Uber Technologies, Inc. et al
ORDER REGARDING SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT. Signed by Judge Edward M. Chen on 7/30/15. (emclc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/30/2015)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
DOUGLAS O’CONNOR, et al.,
For the Northern District of California
United States District Court
No. C-13-3826 EMC
UBER TECHNOLOGIES, INC., et al.,
ORDER REGARDING FILING OF
SECOND AMENDMENT COMPLAINT
On November 11, 2014, the parties filed a stipulation to file a revised second amended
complaint (SAC). Docket No. 201. The proposed SAC was attached to the stipulation as Exhibit A.
The Court approved the stipulation on November 26, 2014, granting “The Parties’ request that
Plaintiffs be granted leave to file a revised Second Amended Complaint.” Docket No. 209. It does
not appear that a revised SAC was ever actually filed, however. The Plaintiffs are hereby directed to
formally file a copy of the approved operative complaint in this matter and label it appropriately on
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated: July 30, 2015
EDWARD M. CHEN
United States District Judge
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?