O'Connor et al v. Uber Technologies, Inc. et al

Filing 318

ORDER REGARDING SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT. Signed by Judge Edward M. Chen on 7/30/15. (emclc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/30/2015)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 6 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 7 8 DOUGLAS O’CONNOR, et al., 9 Plaintiffs, v. 11 For the Northern District of California United States District Court 10 No. C-13-3826 EMC UBER TECHNOLOGIES, INC., et al., 12 ORDER REGARDING FILING OF SECOND AMENDMENT COMPLAINT Defendants. ___________________________________/ 13 14 On November 11, 2014, the parties filed a stipulation to file a revised second amended 15 complaint (SAC). Docket No. 201. The proposed SAC was attached to the stipulation as Exhibit A. 16 The Court approved the stipulation on November 26, 2014, granting “The Parties’ request that 17 Plaintiffs be granted leave to file a revised Second Amended Complaint.” Docket No. 209. It does 18 not appear that a revised SAC was ever actually filed, however. The Plaintiffs are hereby directed to 19 formally file a copy of the approved operative complaint in this matter and label it appropriately on 20 the docket. 21 IT IS SO ORDERED. 22 23 Dated: July 30, 2015 24 25 26 27 28 _________________________ EDWARD M. CHEN United States District Judge

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?