O'Connor et al v. Uber Technologies, Inc. et al

Filing 318

ORDER REGARDING SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT. Signed by Judge Edward M. Chen on 7/30/15. (emclc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/30/2015)

1
2
3
4
5

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

6

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

7
8

DOUGLAS O’CONNOR, et al.,

9

Plaintiffs,
v.

11
For the Northern District of California

United States District Court

10

No. C-13-3826 EMC

UBER TECHNOLOGIES, INC., et al.,

12

ORDER REGARDING FILING OF
SECOND AMENDMENT COMPLAINT

Defendants.
___________________________________/

13
14

On November 11, 2014, the parties filed a stipulation to file a revised second amended

15

complaint (SAC). Docket No. 201. The proposed SAC was attached to the stipulation as Exhibit A.

16

The Court approved the stipulation on November 26, 2014, granting “The Parties’ request that

17

Plaintiffs be granted leave to file a revised Second Amended Complaint.” Docket No. 209. It does

18

not appear that a revised SAC was ever actually filed, however. The Plaintiffs are hereby directed to

19

formally file a copy of the approved operative complaint in this matter and label it appropriately on

20

the docket.

21
IT IS SO ORDERED.
22
23
Dated: July 30, 2015
24
25
26
27
28

_________________________
EDWARD M. CHEN
United States District Judge