O'Connor et al v. Uber Technologies, Inc. et al

Filing 321

SUPPLEMENTAL BRIEFING ORDER. Signed by Judge Edward M. Chen on 7/31/15. (emclc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/31/2015)

1
2
3
4
5

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

6

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

7
8

DOUGLAS O’CONNOR, et al.,

9

No. C-13-3826 EMC

Plaintiffs,
SUPPLEMENTAL BRIEFING ORDER
v.

11
For the Northern District of California

United States District Court

10

UBER TECHNOLOGIES, INC., et al.,

12

Defendants.
___________________________________/

13
14

In connection with its opposition to Plaintiffs’ motion for class certification, Defendants

15

prepared charts that summarize the contents of the various agreements in this case. It appears,

16

however, that some of the charts may not capture all 17 agreements at issue. For instance, Exhibit

17

53 to the Evangelis Declaration does not appear to contain entries regarding the four “driver

18

addenda” in the record. See, e.g., Coleman Decl, Ex. E. For the sake of completeness, the Court

19

asks Uber to file updated and complete chart(s) by Tuesday, August 4, 2015.

20
IT IS SO ORDERED.
21
22
Dated: July 31, 2015
23
24
25
26
27
28

_________________________
EDWARD M. CHEN
United States District Judge