O'Connor et al v. Uber Technologies, Inc. et al
Filing
345
STIPULATION AND ORDER re 343 STIPULATION WITH PROPOSED ORDER To Change Date of Upcoming Status Conference filed by Douglas O'Connor, Set/Reset Deadlines as to 343 STIPULATION WITH PROPOSED ORDER To Change Date of Upcoming Status Conference. Case Management Statement due by 10/14/2015. Further Case Management Conference reset for 10/21/2015 09:30 AM in Courtroom 5, 17th Floor, San Francisco.. Signed by Judge Edward M. Chen on 9/10/15. (bpf, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/10/2015)
1
2
3
4
5
6
GIBSON, DUNN & CRUTCHER LLP
THEODORE J. BOUTROUS, JR., SBN 132099
tboutrous@gibsondunn.com
DEBRA WONG YANG, SBN 123289
dwongyang@gibsondunn.com
MARCELLUS A. MCRAE, SBN 140308
mmcrae@gibsondunn.com
THEANE D. EVANGELIS, SBN 243570
tevangelis@gibsondunn.com
DHANANJAY S. MANTHRIPRAGADA,
SBN 254433
dmanthripragada@gibsondunn.com
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
333 South Grand Avenue
Los Angeles, CA 90071-3197
Telephone:
213.229.7000
Facsimile:
213.229.7520
JOSHUA S. LIPSHUTZ, SBN 242557
jlipshutz@gibsondunn.com
KEVIN J. RING-DOWELL, SBN 278289
kringdowell@gibsondunn.com
555 Mission Street, Suite 3000
San Francisco, CA 94105-0921
Telephone:
415.393.8200
Facsimile:
415.393.8306
SHANNON LISS-RIORDAN, pro hac vice
ADELAIDE PAGANO, pro hac vice
LICHTEN & LISS-RIORDAN, P.C.
729 Boylston Street, Suite 2000
Boston, MA 02116
Telephone:
(617) 994-5800
Facsimile:
(617) 994-5801
sliss@llrlaw.com
apagano@llr law.com
MATTHEW CARLSON, SBN 273242
CARLSON LEGAL SERVICES
100 Pine Street, Suite 1250
San Francisco, CA 94111
Telephone: (415) 817-1470
mcarlson@carlsonlegalservices.com
Attorneys for Plaintiffs
HAKAN YUCESOY, ABDI MAHAMMED,
MOKHTAR TALHA, BRIAN MORRIS, and
PEDRO SANCHEZ, individually and on behalf
of all others similarly situated
14
15
Attorneys for Defendant
UBER TECHNOLOGIES, INC., RYAN
GRAVES, and TRAVIS KALANICK.
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
CASE NO. 3:15-cv-00262-EMC
HAKAN YUCESOY, ABDI MAHAMMED,
MOKHTAR TALHA, BRIAN MORRIS, and
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER
PEDRO SANCHEZ, individually and on
TO CHANGE DATES OF UPCOMING
behalf of all others similarly situated,
HEARINGS AND MODIFY BRIEFING
SCHEDULE FOR DEFENDANTS’ MOTION
Plaintiffs,
TO DISMISS PLAINTIFFS’ SECOND
AMENDED COMPLAINT (modified)
v.
UBER TECHNOLOGIES, INC., RYAN
GRAVES, and TRAVIS KALANICK,
Defendants.
Date: October 8, 2015
Time: 1:30 pm
Place: Courtroom 5
Judge: Hon. Edward M. Chen
26
27
28
STIP. AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO CHANGE DATES OF UPCOMING HEARINGS AND MODIFY BRIEFING
SCHEDULE FOR DEFENDANTS’ MOTION TO DISMISS PLAINTIFFS’ SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT
1
Pursuant to Civil Local Rule 7-12, the undersigned counsel of record for Plaintiffs Hakan Yucesoy,
2
Abdi Mahammed, Mokhtar Talha, Brian Morris, and Pedro Sanchez (“Plaintiffs”) and Defendants
3
Uber Technologies, Inc., Ryan Graves, and Travis Kalanick (“Defendants”) (collectively, the
4
“Parties”) stipulate and agree as follows:
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
WHEREAS, the hearing on Defendants’ Motion to Compel Arbitration as to Plaintiffs Morris
and Sanchez is currently scheduled for October 1, 2015;
WHEREAS, the hearing on Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss Plaintiffs’ Second Amended
Complaint is currently scheduled for October 8, 2015;
WHEREAS, the status conference in the related case of O’Connor v. Uber Technologies, Inc.,
Civ. A. No. 13-3826, is currently scheduled for October 22, 2015;
WHEREAS, the Parties have conferred and agree that it would save time and expense to
12
schedule these hearings on the same date, and the Parties are available on October 15, 2015;
13
WHEREAS, the deadline for Plaintiffs’ Response to Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss
14
Plaintiffs’ Second Amended Complaint is currently September 11, 2015, and the deadline for
15
Defendants’ Reply is currently September 18, 2015 (Doc. 109);
16
WHEREAS, Plaintiffs requested an extension of their Response deadline, and Defendants
17
agreed to extend Plaintiffs’ Response deadline to September 18, 2015 (an additional five business
18
days), and Plaintiffs agreed to extend Defendants’ Reply deadline to October 1, 2015 (an additional
19
four business days), in light of the Parties’ agreement to move the October 8, 2015 hearing to October
20
15, 2015;
21
22
IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED, subject to the Court’s approval, that:
(1)
21
23
24
October 1, 2015 to October 15, 2015; at 9:30 a.m.
(2)
27
28
The hearing on Defendant’s Motion to Dismiss Plaintiffs’ Second Amended
21
25
26
The hearing on Defendant’s Motion to Compel Arbitration is continued from
Complaint is continued from October 8, 2015 to October 15, 2015; at 9:30 a.m.
(3)
The deadline for Plaintiffs’ Response to Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss Plaintiffs’
Second Amended Complaint (Doc. 109) is continued to September 18, 2015, and
the deadline for Defendants’ Reply is continued to October 1, 2015; and
2
STIP. AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO CHANGE DATES OF UPCOMING HEARINGS AND MODIFY BRIEFING
SCHEDULE FOR DEFENDANTS’ MOTION TO DISMISS PLAINTIFFS’ SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT
1
(4)
The status conference in the related case of O’Connor v. Uber Technologies, Inc.,
21
2
Civ. A. No. 13-3826, is moved from October 22, 2015 to October 15, 2015.at 9:30 a.m.
3
4
5
6
7
Dated: September 9, 2015
8
SHANNON LISS-RIORDAN
ADELAIDE PAGANO
LICHTEN & LISS-RIORDAN, P.C.
9
MATTHEW CARLSON
CARLSON LEGAL SERVICES
10
11
By:
12
/s/ Shannon Liss-Riordan
Attorneys for Plaintiffs
HAKAN YUCESOY, ABDI MAHAMMED,
MOKHTAR TALHA, BRIAN MORRIS, and PEDRO
SANCHEZ, individually and on behalf of all others
similarly situated,
13
14
15
16
17
22
THEODORE J. BOUTROUS, JR.
DEBRA WONG YANG
MARCELLUS A. MCRAE
THEANE D. EVANGELIS
JOSHUA S. LIPSHUTZ
DHANANJAY S. MANTHRIPRAGADA
BRANDON J. STOKER
KEVIN J. RING-DOWELL
GIBSON, DUNN & CRUTCHER LLP
23
By: /s/ Dhananjay S. Manthripragada
24
Attorneys for Defendants
UBER TECHNOLOGIES, INC., RYAN GRAVES, and
TRAVIS KALANICK
18
19
20
21
25
Dated: September 9, 2015
26
27
28
3
STIP. AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO CHANGE DATES OF UPCOMING HEARINGS AND MODIFY BRIEFING
SCHEDULE FOR DEFENDANTS’ MOTION TO DISMISS PLAINTIFFS’ SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT
PURSUANT TO THIS STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED. (as modified above)
2
S
UNIT
ED
4
5
In accordance with Local Rule 5-1, the filer of this document hereby attests en the
that
. Ch
dward M
Ju ge E
concurrence to the filing of this document has been obtained fromdthe other signatories hereto.
FO
H
ER
LI
RT
7
DERED
SO OR ED
IT IS
DIFI
AS MO
NO
6
Hon. Edward M. Chen
R NIA
9/10/15
Date: ____________________
RT
U
O
3
S DISTRICT
TE
C
TA
8
9
A
1
N
F
D IS T IC T O
R
C
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
4
STIP. AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO CHANGE DATES OF UPCOMING HEARINGS AND MODIFY BRIEFING
SCHEDULE FOR DEFENDANTS’ MOTION TO DISMISS PLAINTIFFS’ SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?