O'Connor et al v. Uber Technologies, Inc. et al

Filing 350

STIPULATION AND ORDER re 349 STIPULATION WITH PROPOSED ORDER re 346 MOTION to Compel Arbitration as to Certain Absent Class Members to Continue Hearing to October 21, 2015 at 9:30 a.m. filed by Uber Technologies, Inc. Motion Hearing reset for 10/21/2015 09:30 AM in Courtroom 5, 17th Floor, San Francisco before Edward M. Chen.. Signed by Judge Edward M. Chen on 9/15/15. (bpf, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/15/2015)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14

GIBSON, DUNN & CRUTCHER LLP
THEODORE J. BOUTROUS, JR., SBN 132099
[e-mail]
THEANE D. EVANGELIS, SBN 243570
[e-mail]
BRANDON J. STOKER, SBN 277325
[e-mail]
333 South Grand Avenue
Los Angeles, CA 90071-3197
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: 213.229.7520
JOSHUA S. LIPSHUTZ, SBN 242557
[e-mail]
KEVIN J. RING-DOWELL, SBN 278289
[e-mail]
555 Mission Street, Suite 3000
San Francisco, CA 94105-0921
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: 415.393.8306

LICHTEN & LISS-RIORDAN, P.C.
SHANNON LISS-RIORDAN, pro hac vice
[e-mail]
ADELAIDE PAGANO, pro hac vice
[e-mail]
729 Boylston Street, Suite 2000
Boston, MA 02116
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]
CARLSON LEGAL SERVICES
MATTHEW CARLSON, SBN 273242
[e-mail]
100 Pine Street, Suite 1250
San Francisco, CA 94111
Telephone: [phone]
Attorneys for Plaintiffs
DOUGLAS O’CONNOR, THOMAS COLOPY,
MATTHEW MANAHAN, and ELIE
GURFINKEL

Attorneys for Defendant
UBER TECHNOLOGIES, INC.

15

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

16

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

17
18
19

DOUGLAS O’CONNOR, THOMAS
COLOPY, MATTHEW MANAHAN, and
ELIE GURFINKEL, individually and on
behalf of all others similarly situated,

20
21

Plaintiffs,

CASE NO. 13-03826-EMC
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER
REGARDING HEARING SCHEDULE FOR
DEFENDANT’S MOTION TO COMPEL
ARBITRATION AS TO CERTAIN ABSENT
CLASS MEMBERS

v.

22

UBER TECHNOLOGIES, INC.,

23

Defendant.

24
25
26
27
28
Gibson, Dunn &
Crutcher LLP

STIP. AND [PROPOSED] ORDER REGARDING HEARING SCHEDULE – CASE NO. 13-03826-EMC

1

STIPULATION

2

Plaintiffs Douglas O’Connor, Thomas Colopy, Matthew Manahan, and Elie Gurfinkel

3

(“Plaintiffs”) and Defendant Uber Technologies, Inc. (“Uber”) (collectively, the “Parties”), by and

4

through their respective counsel of record, hereby stipulate as follows:

5
6

WHEREAS, on September 10, 2015, Uber filed its motion to compel arbitration as to certain
absent class members, see Docket No. 346;

7
8

WHEREAS, the hearing on Uber’s motion to compel arbitration is currently scheduled for
October 15, 2015;

9
10

WHEREAS, the Court has scheduled a case management conference in this matter for
October 21, 2015 at 9:30 a.m.;

11

WHEREAS, counsel for the Parties will also appear before the Court at on October 21, 2015,

12

at 9:30 a.m. for a hearing on Uber’s motion to compel arbitration in Yucesoy v. Uber Technologies,

13

Inc., No. 15-cv-00262-EMC;

14
15

WHEREAS, certain of the Parties’ counsel will be traveling to San Francisco from Los
Angeles and Boston for the aforementioned hearings;

16

WHEREAS, to conserve the resources of the Court and the Parties, the Parties have conferred

17

and agreed that the October 15, 2015 hearing on Uber’s motion to compel arbitration should be

18

rescheduled for October 21, 2015 at 9:30 a.m., to coincide with the case management conference in

19

this matter and the hearing on Uber’s motion to compel in the Yucesoy matter.

20

NOW THEREFORE, the Parties hereby stipulate, subject to the approval of this Court, that

21

the hearing date for Uber’s motion to compel arbitration as to certain absent class members shall be

22

continued to October 21, 2015 at 9:30 a.m.

23

///

24

///

25

///

26

///

27

///

28

///

Gibson, Dunn &
Crutcher LLP

2
STIP. AND [PROPOSED] ORDER REGARDING HEARING SCHEDULE – CASE NO. 13-03826-EMC

1

IT IS SO STIPULATED

2
3

Dated: September 15, 2015

GIBSON, DUNN & CRUTCHER LLP

4
By:

5
6

/s/ Theodore J. Boutrous Jr.
Theodore J. Boutrous Jr.

Attorneys for Defendant UBER TECHNOLOGIES,
INC.

7
8
9

Dated: September 15, 2015

LICHTEN & LISS-RIORDAN, P.C.

10
By:

11
12

/s/ Shannon Liss-Riordan
Shannon Liss-Riordan

Attorney for Plaintiffs DOUGLAS O’CONNOR,
THOMAS COLOPY, MATTHEW MANAHAN, and
ELIE GURFINKEL

13
14
15
16

PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED.

UNIT
ED

9/15

ISTRIC
ES D
TC
T
TA

RT
U
O

Dated: ___________, 2015

___________________________

21

DERED

22

dward
Judge E

NO

23

RT

24

ER

H

25
26

R NIA

OO
The HonorableR
IT IS S StatesEdward M. Chen
United
District Judge
n

M. Che

FO

20

S

19

LI

18

[PROPOSED] ORDER

A

17

N

F
D IS T IC T O
R

C

27
28
Gibson, Dunn &
Crutcher LLP

3
STIP. AND [PROPOSED] ORDER REGARDING HEARING SCHEDULE – CASE NO. 13-03826-EMC

1
2
3

ECF ATTESTATION
I, Brandon J. Stoker, hereby attest that concurrence in the filing of this document has been obtained
from Theodore J. Boutrous Jr. and Shannon Liss-Riordan.

4
5
6

By:

/s/ Brandon J. Stoker
Brandon J. Stoker

7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
Gibson, Dunn &
Crutcher LLP

4
STIP. AND [PROPOSED] ORDER REGARDING HEARING SCHEDULE – CASE NO. 13-03826-EMC