O'Connor et al v. Uber Technologies, Inc. et al

Filing 385

STIPULATION AND ORDER re 384 STIPULATION WITH PROPOSED ORDER re 383 Order to Extend the Deadline for Parties to File Responses Addressing Arguments Raised in Supplemental Briefs filed by Thomas Colopy, Elie Gurfinkel, Matthew Manahan, Douglas O'Connor. Signed by Judge Edward M. Chen on 11/16/15. (bpf, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/16/2015)

1
2
3
4
5
6

GIBSON, DUNN & CRUTCHER LLP
THEODORE J. BOUTROUS, JR., SBN 132099
[e-mail]
THEANE D. EVANGELIS, SBN 243570
[e-mail]
DHANANJAY S. MANTHRIPRAGADA,
SBN 254433
[e-mail]
333 South Grand Avenue
Los Angeles, CA 90071-3197
Telephone:
213.229.7000
Facsimile:
213.229.7520

7
8
9
10
11
12

JOSHUA S. LIPSHUTZ, SBN 242557
[e-mail]
KEVIN J. RING-DOWELL, SBN 278289
[e-mail]
555 Mission Street, Suite 3000
San Francisco, CA 94105-0921
Telephone:
415.393.8200
Facsimile:
415.393.8306
Attorneys for Defendant
UBER TECHNOLOGIES, INC.

13

SHANNON LISS-RIORDAN, pro hac vice
ADELAIDE PAGANO, pro hac vice
LICHTEN & LISS-RIORDAN, P.C.
729 Boylston Street, Suite 2000
Boston, MA 02116
Telephone:
[phone]
Facsimile:
[phone]
[e-mail]
apagano@llr law.com
MATTHEW CARLSON, SBN 273242
CARLSON LEGAL SERVICES
100 Pine Street, Suite 1250
San Francisco, CA 94111
Telephone:
[phone]
[e-mail]
Attorneys for Plaintiffs
DOUGLAS O’CONNOR, THOMAS COLOPY,
MATTHEW MANAHAN, and ELIE
GURFINKEL, individually and on behalf of all
others similarly situated

14
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

15
16

CASE NO. 3: 13-03826-EMC
17
18
19

DOUGLAS O’CONNOR, THOMAS
COLOPY, MATTHEW MANAHAN, and
ELIE GURFINKEL, individually and on
behalf of all others similarly situated,
Plaintiffs,

20
21
22
23

v.
UBER TECHNOLOGIES, INC.,
Defendant

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER
TO EXTEND THE DEADLINE FOR
PARTIES TO FILE RESPONSES
ADDRESSING ARGUMENTS RAISED IN
SUPPLEMENTAL BRIEFS
Date: November 24, 2015
Time: 1:30 pm
Place: Courtroom 5
Judge: Hon. Edward M. Chen

24
25

Pursuant to Civil Local Rule 7-12, the undersigned counsel of record for Plaintiffs Douglas

26

O’Connor, Thomas Colopy, Matthew Manahan, and Elie Gurfinkel (“Plaintiffs”) and Defendant Uber

27

Technologies, Inc. (“Defendant”) (collectively, the “Parties”) stipulate and agree as follows:

28
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO EXTEND THE DEADLINE FOR PARTIES TO FILE
RESPONSES ADDRESSING ARGUMENTS RAISED IN SUPPLEMENTAL BRIEFS

1

WHEREAS, on November 13, 2015, the Court issued a Supplemental Briefing Order (Dkt.

2

No. 383) stating that by the end of the business day on Monday, November 16, 2015, “[t]he parties

3

may file a response addressing the arguments raised in the supplemental briefs” filed on November

4

10, 2015 (Dkt. Nos. 380, 381);

5
6
7
8
9
10

WHEREAS, Plaintiffs request an extension of the Court-ordered deadline from the end of the
business day on November 16, 2015, to 12:00 p.m. Pacific time on November 18, 2015, because
Attorney Adelaide Pagano, who is the primary associate working with Attorney Shannon LissRiordan in representing the plaintiffs in this matter, had a death in the family and had to travel to
Michigan over the weekend for the funeral, and is expected to return to Boston on the afternoon of
November 17, 2015;

11
WHEREAS, Plaintiffs state that Attorney Liss-Riordan is scheduled to participate in a long12
scheduled full-day mediation in another matter on November 17, 2015;
13
14
15
16

WHEREAS, Plaintiffs state that this extra time will permit Plaintiffs opportunity to prepare
and finalize their reply brief just requested by the Court this past Friday afternoon;
WHEREAS, Defendant is prepared to file its response by the Court-ordered deadline of

17

November 16, 2015, but does not object to Plaintiffs’ request for an extension in light of the

18

circumstances;

19
20
21

IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED, subject to the Court’s approval, that:
The deadline for the parties’ responses addressing the arguments raised in the supplemental briefs
shall be moved to November 18, 2015, at 12:00 p.m. Pacific time.

22
23
24
25
26
27
28

Dated: November 16, 2015

SHANNON LISS-RIORDAN
ADELAIDE PAGANO
LICHTEN & LISS-RIORDAN, P.C.
2

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO EXTEND THE DEADLINE FOR PARTIES TO FILE RESPONSES
ADDRESSING ARGUMENTS RAISED IN SUPPLEMENTAL BRIEFS

1

By:

2

Attorneys for Plaintiffs
DOUGLAS O’CONNOR, THOMAS COLOPY,
MATTHEW MANAHAN, and ELIE GURFINKEL,
individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated

3
4

/s/ Shannon Liss-Riordan

5
Dated: November 16, 2015

7
8
9
10

By: /s/ Dhananjay S. Manthripragada

11

UNIT
ED

14

16

NO

17

20

E document hereby attests that the
In accordance with Local Rule 5-1, the filer of this R
C

H

19

RT

18

en

d M. Ch

dwar
Judge E

R NIA

ERED
O ORD
T IS S
Hon.IEdward M. Chen

November 16, 2015
Date: ____________________

FO

15

RT
U
O

S DISTRICT
TE
C
PURSUANT TO THIS STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED. A
T

LI

13

Attorneys for Defendant
UBER TECHNOLOGIES, INC.

S

12

THEODORE J. BOUTROUS, JR.
THEANE D. EVANGELIS
JOSHUA S. LIPSHUTZ
DHANANJAY S. MANTHRIPRAGADA
KEVIN J. RING-DOWELL
GIBSON, DUNN & CRUTCHER LLP

A

6

N

F
D IS T IC T O
R
concurrence to the filing of this document has been obtained from the other signatories hereto.

21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28

3
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO EXTEND THE DEADLINE FOR PARTIES TO FILE RESPONSES
ADDRESSING ARGUMENTS RAISED IN SUPPLEMENTAL BRIEFS

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28