O'Connor et al v. Uber Technologies, Inc. et al

Filing 441

ORDER re 440 Defendant's Motion for Administrative Relief. Plaintiffs' opposition to the motion to expedite is due January 4, 2016 by 2:00 p.m. Signed by Judge Edward M. Chen on 12/31/2015. (emclc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 12/31/2015)

1
2
3

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

4

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

5
6

DOUGLAS O’CONNOR, et al.,
Plaintiffs,

7
8
9

UBER TECHNOLOGIES, INC., et al.,
Defendants.

For the Northern District of California

United States District Court

11
12

IN RE UBER FCRA LITIGATION

13
14

17
18

ORDER RE DEFENDANT’S REQUEST
TO EXPEDITE THE BRIEFING
SCHEDULE ON DEFENDANT’S
MOTION TO STAY
O’Connor Docket No. 440
In re Uber FCRA Litigation Docket No. 141

HAKAN YUCESOY, et al.,

15
16

Case No. 14-cv-05200-EMC
Case No. 15-cv-00262-EMC

v.

10

Case No. 13-cv-03826-EMC

Yucesoy Docket No. 167

Plaintiffs,
v.
UBER TECHNOLOGIES, INC., et al.,
Defendants.

19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28

On December 30, 2015, Defendant Uber Technologies, Inc. filed a motion for
administrative relief to expedite the briefing schedule on Uber’s motion to stay the Court’s
December 23, 2015 order on Plaintiffs’ motions to enjoin Uber’s communications with class and
putative class members. Plaintiffs are to file any opposition to Uber’s motion to expedite the
briefing schedule on the motion to stay by January 4, 2016 at 2:00 P.M.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated: December 31, 2015
______________________________________
EDWARD M. CHEN
United States District Judge