O'Connor et al v. Uber Technologies, Inc. et al
Filing
460
ORDER RE FINAL CLASS NOTICE. Signed by Judge Edward M. Chen on 1/12/2016. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit)(emclc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/12/2016)
1
2
3
4
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
5
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
6
7
DOUGLAS O'CONNOR, et al.,
Case No. 13-cv-03826-EMC
Plaintiffs,
8
ORDER RE FINAL CLASS NOTICE
v.
9
Docket No. 453
10
UBER TECHNOLOGIES, INC., et al.,
Defendants.
12
For the Northern District of California
United States District Court
11
On January 7, 2016, the parties submitted a “Notice of Further Revised Draft Notices to
13
14
Class and Non-Class Members.” Docket No. 453. The Court has reviewed the Revised Draft
15
Notices, and resolves the issues raised by the parties as follows.
First, with respect to the opt-out mechanism, the language of the pre-addressed e-mail will
16
17
be: “Please exclude me from this class action.”
Second, Plaintiffs’ counsel requests the inclusion of counsel’s contact information in the
18
19
notice to non-class members. Docket No. 453 at 3-4. The Court denies this request.
Third, the parties are unable to agree on an e-mail address for class members who wish to
20
21
opt-out. The e-mail address will be “uberclassexclude@[Notice Administrator’s domain],” unless
22
the parties mutually agree on an e-mail address. Opt-outs should be sent directly to the Notice
23
Administrator, not to Uber.
24
///
25
///
26
///
27
///
28
///
1
Finally, the Court has resolved the parties’ remaining disagreements as shown in the
2
redlined version of the proposed class notice and non-class member notice attached as Exhibit A.
3
Absent extraordinary circumstances, no further changes will be made.
4
5
IT IS SO ORDERED.
6
7
8
9
Dated: January 12, 2016
______________________________________
EDWARD M. CHEN
United States District Judge
10
12
For the Northern District of California
United States District Court
11
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?