O'Connor et al v. Uber Technologies, Inc. et al
Filing
471
ORDER re 467 STIPULATION WITH PROPOSED ORDER Second Amended Stipulated Protective Order filed by Uber Technologies, Inc. Signed by Magistrate Judge Donna M. Ryu on 02/03/2016. (dmrlc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/3/2016)
1
2
3
4
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
5
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
6
7
DOUGLAS O'CONNOR, et al.,
Case No. 13-cv-03826-EMC (DMR)
Plaintiffs,
8
v.
9
10
UBER TECHNOLOGIES, INC., et al.,
Defendants.
ORDER RE PROPOSED SECOND
AMENDED STIPULATED
PROTECTIVE ORDER
Re: Dkt. No. 467
12
The court has received the parties’ proposed second amended stipulated protective order.
13
[Docket No. 467.] It is not clear how this proposed stipulated protective order differs from the
14
November 26, 2014 amended protective order (Docket No. 208), since the parties did not submit a
15
redlined version for the court’s review. By no later than February 9, 2016, the parties shall submit
16
a brief joint statement describing the differences between the two protective orders and explaining
17
why such changes are necessary.
25
26
27
28
ER
R NIA
FO
Judge
H
24
RT
23
NO
22
______________________________________
Donna M. Ryu
M. Ryu
United StatesoMagistrate Judge
D nna
LI
21
Dated: February 3, 2016
D
RDERE
OO
IT IS S
A
20
IT IS SO ORDERED.
UNIT
ED
19
S
18
S DISTRICT
TE
C
TA
RT
U
O
United States District Court
Northern District of California
11
N
D IS T IC T
R
OF
C
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?