O'Connor et al v. Uber Technologies, Inc. et al

Filing 471

ORDER re 467 STIPULATION WITH PROPOSED ORDER Second Amended Stipulated Protective Order filed by Uber Technologies, Inc. Signed by Magistrate Judge Donna M. Ryu on 02/03/2016. (dmrlc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/3/2016)

1
2
3
4

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

5

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

6
7

DOUGLAS O'CONNOR, et al.,

Case No. 13-cv-03826-EMC (DMR)

Plaintiffs,
8
v.
9
10

UBER TECHNOLOGIES, INC., et al.,
Defendants.

ORDER RE PROPOSED SECOND
AMENDED STIPULATED
PROTECTIVE ORDER
Re: Dkt. No. 467

12

The court has received the parties’ proposed second amended stipulated protective order.

13

[Docket No. 467.] It is not clear how this proposed stipulated protective order differs from the

14

November 26, 2014 amended protective order (Docket No. 208), since the parties did not submit a

15

redlined version for the court’s review. By no later than February 9, 2016, the parties shall submit

16

a brief joint statement describing the differences between the two protective orders and explaining

17

why such changes are necessary.

25
26
27
28

ER

R NIA

FO

Judge

H

24

RT

23

NO

22

______________________________________
Donna M. Ryu
M. Ryu
United StatesoMagistrate Judge
D nna

LI

21

Dated: February 3, 2016

D

RDERE

OO
IT IS S

A

20

IT IS SO ORDERED.

UNIT
ED

19

S

18

S DISTRICT
TE
C
TA

RT
U
O

United States District Court
Northern District of California

11

N

D IS T IC T
R

OF

C