O'Connor et al v. Uber Technologies, Inc. et al

Filing 500

STIPULATION AND ORDER re 494 STIPULATION WITH PROPOSED ORDER filed by Uber Technologies, Inc. Pretrial filings due May 9, 2016. Signed by Judge Edward M. Chen on 3/31/16. (bpf, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/31/2016)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14

GIBSON, DUNN & CRUTCHER LLP
THEODORE J. BOUTROUS, JR., SBN 132099
[e-mail]
THEANE D. EVANGELIS, SBN 243570
[e-mail]
DHANANJAY S. MANTHRIPRAGADA, SBN
254433
[e-mail]
333 South Grand Avenue
Los Angeles, CA 90071-3197
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: 213.229.7520
JOSHUA S. LIPSHUTZ, SBN 242557
[e-mail]
KEVIN J. RING-DOWELL, SBN 278289
[e-mail]
555 Mission Street, Suite 3000
San Francisco, CA 94105-0921
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: 415.393.8306

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

17

20
21
22
23
24

Attorneys for Plaintiffs
DOUGLAS O’CONNOR, THOMAS COLOPY,
MATTHEW MANAHAN, and ELIE
GURFINKEL

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

16

19

CARLSON LEGAL SERVICES
MATTHEW CARLSON, SBN 273242
[e-mail]
100 Pine Street, Suite 1250
San Francisco, CA 94111
Telephone: [phone]

Attorneys for Defendant
UBER TECHNOLOGIES, INC.

15

18

LICHTEN & LISS-RIORDAN, P.C.
SHANNON LISS-RIORDAN, pro hac vice
[e-mail]
ADELAIDE PAGANO, pro hac vice
[e-mail]
729 Boylston Street, Suite 2000
Boston, MA 02116
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]

DOUGLAS O’CONNOR, THOMAS
COLOPY, MATTHEW MANAHAN, and
ELIE GURFINKEL, individually and on
behalf of all others similarly situated,
Plaintiffs,

CASE NO. 13-03826-EMC
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER
TO CONTINUE DEADLINE TO FILE
JOINT PRETRIAL CONFERENCE
STATEMENT, PRETRIAL MATERIALS,
AND EXPERT REPORTS

v.
UBER TECHNOLOGIES, INC.,
Defendant.

25
26
27
28
Gibson, Dunn &
Crutcher LLP

STIP. AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO CONTINUE DEADLINE TO FILE JOINT PRETRIAL CONFERENCE
STATEMENT, PRETRIAL MATERIALS, AND EXPERT REPORTS
CASE NO. 13-03826-EMC

STIPULATION

1
2

Pursuant to Civil Local Rule 7-12, Plaintiffs Douglas O’Connor, Thomas Colopy, Matthew

3

Manahan, and Elie Gurfinkel (“Plaintiffs”) and Defendant Uber Technologies, Inc. (“Uber”)

4

(collectively, the “Parties”), by and through their respective counsel of record, hereby stipulate as

5

follows:

6
7

WHEREAS, on November 5, 2015, the Court ordered that trial in the above-captioned matter
shall commence on June 20, 2016, see Dkt. 378;

8

WHEREAS, on November 5, 2015, the Court ordered that the Parties submit a joint pretrial

9

conference statement and pretrial materials at least twenty-one days prior to the final pretrial

10

conference, and the present deadline to file the joint pretrial conference statement and pretrial

11

materials is May 3, 2016, see Dkt. 378;

12

WHEREAS, on January 5, 2016, the Court ordered that the Parties submit expert reports 30

13

days after the opt-out deadline, and the present deadline to file opening expert reports is April 28,

14

2016, see Dkt. 447;

15

WHEREAS, on January 5, 2016, the Court ordered that the Parties submit rebuttal expert

16

reports 14 days after the submission of opening expert reports, and the present deadline to file

17

rebuttal expert reports is May 12, 2016, see Dkt. 447;

18

WHEREAS, the Parties are continuing in good faith to meet and confer on various issues

19

related to the joint pretrial conference statement, pretrial materials, and issues related to expert

20

reports;

21

NOW THEREFORE, the Parties hereby stipulate, subject to the approval of this Court, that
9

22

the joint pretrial conference statement and pretrial materials shall be due on May 10, 2016, expert

23

opening reports shall be due on May 5, 2016, and expert rebuttal reports shall be due on May 19,

24

2016.

25

///

26

///

27

///

28
Gibson, Dunn &
Crutcher LLP

2
STIP. AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO CONTINUE DEADLINE TO FILE JOINT PRETRIAL CONFERENCE
STATEMENT, PRETRIAL MATERIALS, AND EXPERT REPORTS
CASE NO. 13-03826-EMC

1
2
3

IT IS SO STIPULATED
Dated: March 24, 2016

GIBSON, DUNN & CRUTCHER LLP

4
By:

5
6

/s/ Dhananjay S. Manthripragada
Dhananjay S. Manthripragada

Attorneys for Defendant UBER TECHNOLOGIES,
INC.

7
8
9

Dated: March 24, 2016

LICHTEN & LISS-RIORDAN, P.C.

10
By:

11
12

/s/ Shannon Liss-Riordan
Shannon Liss-Riordan

Attorney for Plaintiffs DOUGLAS O’CONNOR,
THOMAS COLOPY, MATTHEW MANAHAN, and
ELIE GURFINKEL

13
14
15
16

PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED.

19

S

March 31

____________________________

UNIT
ED

Dated: ___________, 2016

S DISTRICT
TE
C
TA

RT
U
O

21

DERED

H

N

M. Chen

F
D IS T IC T O
R

C

ER

26

n

FO

M. Che

LI

dward
Judge E

A

H

25

R NIA

UNIT
ED

RT

Judge Edward

R NIA

NO

RT

24

ORDERED
IT IS SO
AS MODIFIED

ER

A

NO

23

S DISTRICT
TE
C
TA

RT
U
O

22

S

The HonorableOR
SO
IT ISStatesEdward M. Chen
United S MODistrictD
DIFIE Judge
FO

20

(as modified above)

LI

18

[PROPOSED] ORDER

A

17

N

D IS T IC T
R

OF

C

27
28
Gibson, Dunn &
Crutcher LLP

3
STIP. AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO CONTINUE DEADLINE TO FILE JOINT PRETRIAL CONFERENCE
STATEMENT, PRETRIAL MATERIALS, AND EXPERT REPORTS
CASE NO. 13-03826-EMC

1
2
3

ECF ATTESTATION
I, Dhananjay S. Manthripragada, hereby attest that concurrence in the filing of this document has
been obtained from Shannon Liss-Riordan.

4
5
6

By:

/s/ Dhananjay S. Manthripragada
Dhananjay S. Manthripragada

7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
Gibson, Dunn &
Crutcher LLP

4
STIP. AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO CONTINUE DEADLINE TO FILE JOINT PRETRIAL CONFERENCE
STATEMENT, PRETRIAL MATERIALS, AND EXPERT REPORTS
CASE NO. 13-03826-EMC