O'Connor et al v. Uber Technologies, Inc. et al

Filing 515

STIPULATION AND ORDER re 514 to Continue Deadline For Plaintiffs to File Opposition to Defendant's Motion to Stay [Dkt. 506] filed by Thomas Colopy, Elie Gurfinkel, Matthew Manahan, Douglas O'Connor. Signed by Judge Edward M. Chen on 4/13/16. (bpf, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/13/2016)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9

GIBSON, DUNN & CRUTCHER LLP
THEODORE J. BOUTROUS, JR., SBN 132099
[e-mail]
DEBRA WONG YANG, SBN 123289
[e-mail]
MARCELLUS A. MCRAE, SBN 140308
[e-mail]
THEANE D. EVANGELIS, SBN 243570
[e-mail]
DHANANJAY S. MANTHRIPRAGADA,
SBN 254433
[e-mail]
BRANDON J. STOKER, SBN 277325
[e-mail]
333 South Grand Avenue
Los Angeles, CA 90071-3197
Telephone:
213.229.7000
Facsimile:
213.229.7520

10
11
12
13
14
15

JOSHUA S. LIPSHUTZ, SBN 242557
[e-mail]
KEVIN J. RING-DOWELL, SBN 278289
[e-mail]
555 Mission Street, Suite 3000
San Francisco, CA 94105-0921
Telephone:
415.393.8200
Facsimile:
415.393.8306

SHANNON LISS-RIORDAN, pro hac vice
ADELAIDE PAGANO, pro hac vice
LICHTEN & LISS-RIORDAN, P.C.
729 Boylston Street, Suite 2000
Boston, MA 02116
Telephone:
[phone]
Facsimile:
[phone]
[e-mail]
[e-mail]
MATTHEW CARLSON (SBN 273242)
([e-mail])
LICHTEN & LISS-RIORDAN, P.C.
466 Geary St., Suite 201
San Francisco, CA 94102
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile:
[phone]
Attorneys for Plaintiffs
DOUGLAS O’CONNOR, THOMAS COLOPY,
MATTHEW MANAHAN, and ELIE
GURFINKEL, individually and on behalf of all
others similarly situated

Attorneys for Defendant
UBER TECHNOLOGIES, INC.

16
17
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
CASE NO. 3:13-cv-3826-EMC
DOUGLAS O’CONNOR, THOMAS
COLOPY, MATTHEW MANAHAN, and
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER
ELIE GURFINKEL, individually and on
TO CONTINUE DEADLINE FOR
behalf of all others similarly situated,
PLAINTIFFS TO FILE OPPOSITION TO
DEFENDANT’S MOTION TO STAY [DKT.
Plaintiffs,
506]
v.
Judge: Hon. Edward M. Chen
UBER TECHNOLOGIES, INC.,
Defendants.

26
27
28
STIP. AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO CONTINUE DEADLINE TO FILE OPPOSITION TO DEFENDANT’S
MOTION TO STAY [DKT. 506]

1

Pursuant to Civil Local Rule 7-12, the undersigned counsel of record for Plaintiffs Douglas

2

O’Connor, Thomas Colopy, Matthew Manahan, and Elie Gurfinkel (“Plaintiffs”) and Defendant Uber

3

Technologies, Inc. (“Defendant”) (collectively, the “Parties”) stipulate and agree as follows:

4
5

WHEREAS, pursuant to this Court’s Order (Dkt. 508), Plaintiffs’ Opposition to Defendant’s
Motion to Stay, is currently due on April 13, 2016;

6
7

WHEREAS, the parties have conferred and agreed to a brief extension of one week for
Plaintiffs to file their Opposition until April 20, 2016;

8
9

IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED, subject to the Court’s approval, that:
(1)

Plaintiffs’ Opposition to Defendant’s Motion to Stay, will be due on April 20, 2016.

10
11

Dated: April 13, 2016

12
13
14

By:

15

17
18

20
21
22
23

/s/ Shannon Liss-Riordan

Attorneys for Plaintiffs
DOUGLAS O’CONNOR, THOMAS COLOPY,
MATTHEW MANAHAN, and ELIE GURFINKEL,
individually and on behalf of all others similarly
situated,

16

19

SHANNON LISS-RIORDAN
ADELAIDE PAGANO
MATTHEW CARLSON
LICHTEN & LISS-RIORDAN, P.C.

Dated: April 13, 2016

THEODORE J. BOUTROUS, JR.
DEBRA WONG YANG
MARCELLUS A. MCRAE
THEANE D. EVANGELIS
JOSHUA S. LIPSHUTZ
DHANANJAY S. MANTHRIPRAGADA
BRANDON J. STOKER
KEVIN J. RING-DOWELL
GIBSON, DUNN & CRUTCHER LLP

24
25
26

By: /s/ Kevin J. Ring-Dowell
Attorneys for Defendant
UBER TECHNOLOGIES, INC.

27
28

2
STIP. AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO CONTINUE DEADLINE TO FILE OPPOSITION TO DEFENDANT’S
MOTION TO STAY [DKT. 506]

H

RN

FO

RT

Hon. Edward M. Chen
E

5

R NIA

. Chen
dward M

Judge E

LI

S

4/13/16

Date: ____________________

ERED

O ORD
IT IS S

NO

4

UNIT
ED

3

S DISTRICT
TE
C
TA

RT
U
O

2

PURSUANT TO THIS STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED.

A

1

F
D IS T IC T O
R

C

6
7
8

In accordance with Local Rule 5-1, the filer of this document hereby attests that the
concurrence to the filing of this document has been obtained from the other signatories hereto.

9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28

3
STIP. AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO CONTINUE DEADLINE TO FILE OPPOSITION TO DEFENDANT’S
MOTION TO STAY [DKT. 506]