O'Connor et al v. Uber Technologies, Inc. et al

Filing 525

STIPULATION AND ORDER re 517 MOTION for Leave to File Excess Pages (Unopposed) filed by Thomas Colopy, Elie Gurfinkel, Matthew Manahan, Douglas O'Connor. Signed by Judge Edward M. Chen on 4/22/16. (bpfS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/22/2016)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 GIBSON, DUNN & CRUTCHER LLP THEODORE J. BOUTROUS, JR., SBN 132099 tboutrous@gibsondunn.com DEBRA WONG YANG, SBN 123289 dwongyang@gibsondunn.com MARCELLUS A. MCRAE, SBN 140308 mmcrae@gibsondunn.com THEANE D. EVANGELIS, SBN 243570 tevangelis@gibsondunn.com DHANANJAY S. MANTHRIPRAGADA, SBN 254433 dmanthripragada@gibsondunn.com BRANDON J. STOKER, SBN 277325 bstoker@gibsondunn.com 333 South Grand Avenue Los Angeles, CA 90071-3197 Telephone: 213.229.7000 Facsimile: 213.229.7520 10 11 12 13 14 15 JOSHUA S. LIPSHUTZ, SBN 242557 jlipshutz@gibsondunn.com KEVIN J. RING-DOWELL, SBN 278289 kringdowell@gibsondunn.com 555 Mission Street, Suite 3000 San Francisco, CA 94105-0921 Telephone: 415.393.8200 Facsimile: 415.393.8306 SHANNON LISS-RIORDAN, pro hac vice ADELAIDE PAGANO, pro hac vice LICHTEN & LISS-RIORDAN, P.C. 729 Boylston Street, Suite 2000 Boston, MA 02116 Telephone: (617) 994-5800 Facsimile: (617) 994-5801 sliss@llrlaw.com apagano@llrlaw.com MATTHEW CARLSON (SBN 273242) (mcarlson@llrlaw.com) LICHTEN & LISS-RIORDAN, P.C. 466 Geary St., Suite 201 San Francisco, CA 94102 Telephone: (617) 994-5800 Facsimile: (617) 994-5801 Attorneys for Plaintiffs DOUGLAS O’CONNOR, THOMAS COLOPY, MATTHEW MANAHAN, and ELIE GURFINKEL, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated Attorneys for Defendant UBER TECHNOLOGIES, INC. 16 17 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 18 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 19 20 21 22 DOUGLAS O’CONNOR, THOMAS COLOPY, MATTHEW MANAHAN, and ELIE GURFINKEL, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, 23 Plaintiffs, 24 25 26 CASE NO. 3:13-cv-3826-EMC STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER REGARDING PLAINTIFFS’ UNOPPOSED MOTION FOR ADMINISTRATIVE RELIEF TO FILE OVERLENGTH BRIEF v. UBER TECHNOLOGIES, INC., Defendant. L.R. 7-11 Judge: Hon. Edward M. Chen Date Filed: August 16, 2013 27 28 Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher LLP STIP. AND [PROPOSED] ORDER REGARDING PLAINTIFFS’ UNOPPOSED MOTION FOR ADMINISTRATIVE RELIEF TO FILE OVERLEGNTH BRIEF Case No. 13-cv-3826-EMC, Case No. 15- cv-00262-EMC 1 2 3 4 5 6 HAKAN YUCESOY, ABDI MAHAMMED, MOKHTAR TALHA, BRIAN MORRIS, and PEDRO SANCHEZ, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, Plaintiffs, v. UBER TECHNOLOGIES, INC. and TRAVIS KALANICK, Defendants. 7 CASE NO. 3:15-cv-00262-EMC STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER REGARDING PLAINTIFFS’ UNOPPOSED MOTION FOR ADMINISTRATIVE RELIEF TO FILE OVERLENGTH BRIEF L.R. 7-11 Judge: Hon. Edward M. Chen Date Filed: August 16, 2013 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 GIBSON, DUNN & CRUTCHER LLP JOSHUA S. LIPSHUTZ, SBN 242557 jlipshutz@gibsondunn.com KEVIN J. RING-DOWELL, SBN 278289 kringdowell@gibsondunn.com 555 Mission Street, Suite 3000 San Francisco, CA 94105-0921 Telephone: 415.393.8200 Facsimile: 415.393.8306 Attorneys for Defendant UBER TECHNOLOGIES, INC. And TRAVIS KALANICK 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2 Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher LLP STIP. AND [PROPOSED] ORDER REGARDING PLAINTIFFS’ UNOPPOSED MOTION FOR ADMINISTRATIVE RELIEF TO FILE OVERLEGNTH BRIEF Case No. 13-cv-3826-EMC, Case No. 15- cv-00262-EMC 1 The undersigned Parties, by and through their respective counsel, do hereby stipulate: 2 WHEREAS, the parties agree that an additional seven pages is necessary and will be 3 sufficient for Plaintiffs to address all issues that must be raised in a Motion for Preliminary Approval 4 of Class Action Settlement, including the requirements of Rule 23 and the reasons that the Court 5 should preliminarily approve the parties’ class action settlement; 6 IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED, by and between Plaintiffs and Defendant, by and through 7 their respective counsel, that Plaintiffs may file a Motion for Preliminary Approval of Class Action 8 Settlement of up to 32 pages in length. 9 10 IT IS SO STIPULATED. 11 12 Dated: April 21, 2016 SHANNON LISS-RIORDAN LICHTEN & LISS-RIORDAN, P.C. 13 14 By: 15 Attorneys for Plaintiffs DOUGLAS O’CONNOR, THOMAS COLOPY, MATTHEW MANAHAN, and ELIE GURFINKEL, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, 16 17 /s/ Shannon Liss-Riordan 18 19 Dated: April 21, 2016 KEVIN J. RING-DOWELL GIBSON, DUNN & CRUTCHER LLP 20 By: /s/ Kevin J. Ring-Dowell 21 Attorneys for Defendant UBER TECHNOLOGIES, INC. 22 S RT Crutcher LLP R NIA A E MOTION FOR ADMINISTRATIVE STIP. AND [PROPOSED] ORDER REGARDING PLAINTIFFS’ UNOPPOSEDR C RELIEF TO FILE OVERLEGNTH BRIEF N D OF Case No. 13-cv-3826-EMC, Case No. 15- cv-00262-EMC I S T R I C T H Gibson, Dunn & en Hon. Edward M. Edward M. Ch Chen Judge NO 28 April 22, 2016 Date: ____________________ FO 26 ERED O ORD IT IS S LI 25 27 RT U O 24 S DISTRICT TE C A PURSUANT TO THIS STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED. T UNIT ED 23 1 2 3 LOCAL CIVIL RULE 5-1 ATTESTATION In accordance with Local Civil Rule 5-1(i)(3), the filer of this document hereby attests that the concurrence to the filing of this document has been obtained from the other signatories hereto. 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2 Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher LLP STIP. AND [PROPOSED] ORDER REGARDING PLAINTIFFS’ UNOPPOSED MOTION FOR ADMINISTRATIVE RELIEF TO FILE OVERLEGNTH BRIEF Case No. 13-cv-3826-EMC, Case No. 15- cv-00262-EMC

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?