O'Connor et al v. Uber Technologies, Inc. et al
Filing
525
STIPULATION AND ORDER re 517 MOTION for Leave to File Excess Pages (Unopposed) filed by Thomas Colopy, Elie Gurfinkel, Matthew Manahan, Douglas O'Connor. Signed by Judge Edward M. Chen on 4/22/16. (bpfS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/22/2016)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
GIBSON, DUNN & CRUTCHER LLP
THEODORE J. BOUTROUS, JR., SBN 132099
tboutrous@gibsondunn.com
DEBRA WONG YANG, SBN 123289
dwongyang@gibsondunn.com
MARCELLUS A. MCRAE, SBN 140308
mmcrae@gibsondunn.com
THEANE D. EVANGELIS, SBN 243570
tevangelis@gibsondunn.com
DHANANJAY S. MANTHRIPRAGADA,
SBN 254433
dmanthripragada@gibsondunn.com
BRANDON J. STOKER, SBN 277325
bstoker@gibsondunn.com
333 South Grand Avenue
Los Angeles, CA 90071-3197
Telephone:
213.229.7000
Facsimile:
213.229.7520
10
11
12
13
14
15
JOSHUA S. LIPSHUTZ, SBN 242557
jlipshutz@gibsondunn.com
KEVIN J. RING-DOWELL, SBN 278289
kringdowell@gibsondunn.com
555 Mission Street, Suite 3000
San Francisco, CA 94105-0921
Telephone:
415.393.8200
Facsimile:
415.393.8306
SHANNON LISS-RIORDAN, pro hac vice
ADELAIDE PAGANO, pro hac vice
LICHTEN & LISS-RIORDAN, P.C.
729 Boylston Street, Suite 2000
Boston, MA 02116
Telephone:
(617) 994-5800
Facsimile:
(617) 994-5801
sliss@llrlaw.com
apagano@llrlaw.com
MATTHEW CARLSON (SBN 273242)
(mcarlson@llrlaw.com)
LICHTEN & LISS-RIORDAN, P.C.
466 Geary St., Suite 201
San Francisco, CA 94102
Telephone: (617) 994-5800
Facsimile:
(617) 994-5801
Attorneys for Plaintiffs
DOUGLAS O’CONNOR, THOMAS COLOPY,
MATTHEW MANAHAN, and ELIE
GURFINKEL, individually and on behalf of all
others similarly situated
Attorneys for Defendant
UBER TECHNOLOGIES, INC.
16
17
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
18
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
19
20
21
22
DOUGLAS O’CONNOR, THOMAS
COLOPY, MATTHEW MANAHAN, and
ELIE GURFINKEL, individually and on
behalf of all others similarly situated,
23
Plaintiffs,
24
25
26
CASE NO. 3:13-cv-3826-EMC
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED]
ORDER REGARDING PLAINTIFFS’
UNOPPOSED MOTION FOR
ADMINISTRATIVE RELIEF TO FILE
OVERLENGTH BRIEF
v.
UBER TECHNOLOGIES, INC.,
Defendant.
L.R. 7-11
Judge: Hon. Edward M. Chen
Date Filed: August 16, 2013
27
28
Gibson, Dunn &
Crutcher LLP
STIP. AND [PROPOSED] ORDER REGARDING PLAINTIFFS’ UNOPPOSED MOTION FOR ADMINISTRATIVE
RELIEF TO FILE OVERLEGNTH BRIEF
Case No. 13-cv-3826-EMC, Case No. 15- cv-00262-EMC
1
2
3
4
5
6
HAKAN YUCESOY, ABDI MAHAMMED,
MOKHTAR TALHA, BRIAN MORRIS, and
PEDRO SANCHEZ, individually and on
behalf of all others similarly situated,
Plaintiffs,
v.
UBER TECHNOLOGIES, INC. and TRAVIS
KALANICK,
Defendants.
7
CASE NO. 3:15-cv-00262-EMC
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED]
ORDER REGARDING PLAINTIFFS’
UNOPPOSED MOTION FOR
ADMINISTRATIVE RELIEF TO FILE
OVERLENGTH BRIEF
L.R. 7-11
Judge: Hon. Edward M. Chen
Date Filed: August 16, 2013
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
GIBSON, DUNN & CRUTCHER LLP
JOSHUA S. LIPSHUTZ, SBN 242557
jlipshutz@gibsondunn.com
KEVIN J. RING-DOWELL, SBN 278289
kringdowell@gibsondunn.com
555 Mission Street, Suite 3000
San Francisco, CA 94105-0921
Telephone:
415.393.8200
Facsimile:
415.393.8306
Attorneys for Defendant UBER TECHNOLOGIES, INC.
And TRAVIS KALANICK
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Gibson, Dunn &
Crutcher LLP
STIP. AND [PROPOSED] ORDER REGARDING PLAINTIFFS’ UNOPPOSED MOTION FOR ADMINISTRATIVE
RELIEF TO FILE OVERLEGNTH BRIEF
Case No. 13-cv-3826-EMC, Case No. 15- cv-00262-EMC
1
The undersigned Parties, by and through their respective counsel, do hereby stipulate:
2
WHEREAS, the parties agree that an additional seven pages is necessary and will be
3
sufficient for Plaintiffs to address all issues that must be raised in a Motion for Preliminary Approval
4
of Class Action Settlement, including the requirements of Rule 23 and the reasons that the Court
5
should preliminarily approve the parties’ class action settlement;
6
IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED, by and between Plaintiffs and Defendant, by and through
7
their respective counsel, that Plaintiffs may file a Motion for Preliminary Approval of Class Action
8
Settlement of up to 32 pages in length.
9
10
IT IS SO STIPULATED.
11
12
Dated: April 21, 2016
SHANNON LISS-RIORDAN
LICHTEN & LISS-RIORDAN, P.C.
13
14
By:
15
Attorneys for Plaintiffs
DOUGLAS O’CONNOR, THOMAS COLOPY,
MATTHEW MANAHAN, and ELIE GURFINKEL,
individually and on behalf of all others similarly
situated,
16
17
/s/ Shannon Liss-Riordan
18
19
Dated: April 21, 2016
KEVIN J. RING-DOWELL
GIBSON, DUNN & CRUTCHER LLP
20
By: /s/ Kevin J. Ring-Dowell
21
Attorneys for Defendant
UBER TECHNOLOGIES, INC.
22
S
RT
Crutcher LLP
R NIA
A
E MOTION FOR ADMINISTRATIVE
STIP. AND [PROPOSED] ORDER REGARDING PLAINTIFFS’ UNOPPOSEDR
C
RELIEF TO FILE OVERLEGNTH BRIEF N D
OF
Case No. 13-cv-3826-EMC, Case No. 15- cv-00262-EMC I S T R I C T
H
Gibson, Dunn &
en
Hon. Edward M. Edward M. Ch
Chen
Judge
NO
28
April 22, 2016
Date: ____________________
FO
26
ERED
O ORD
IT IS S
LI
25
27
RT
U
O
24
S DISTRICT
TE
C
A
PURSUANT TO THIS STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED. T
UNIT
ED
23
1
2
3
LOCAL CIVIL RULE 5-1 ATTESTATION
In accordance with Local Civil Rule 5-1(i)(3), the filer of this document hereby attests that the
concurrence to the filing of this document has been obtained from the other signatories hereto.
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Gibson, Dunn &
Crutcher LLP
STIP. AND [PROPOSED] ORDER REGARDING PLAINTIFFS’ UNOPPOSED MOTION FOR ADMINISTRATIVE
RELIEF TO FILE OVERLEGNTH BRIEF
Case No. 13-cv-3826-EMC, Case No. 15- cv-00262-EMC
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?