O'Connor et al v. Uber Technologies, Inc. et al

Filing 530

ORDER RE SERVICE ON COUNSEL OF RELATED CASES. Signed by Judge Edward M. Chen on 4/27/16. (bpfS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/27/2016)

1
2
3
4

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

5

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

6
7

DOUGLAS O'CONNOR, et al.,
Plaintiffs,

8

UBER TECHNOLOGIES, INC., et al.,
Defendants.

For the Northern District of California

United States District Court

11
12

HAKAN YUCESOY, et al.,

13

ORDER RE SERVICE ON COUNSEL
OF RELATED CASES

Plaintiffs,

14
15

Case No. 15-cv-0262-EMC

v.

9
10

Case No. 13-cv-03826-EMC

v.
UBER TECHNOLOGIES, INC., et al.,

16

Defendants

17
18

On April 21, 2016, Plaintiffs in O’Connor v. Uber Technologies and Yucesoy v. Uber

19

Technologies moved for preliminary approval of a class settlement. The parties are to serve a

20

complete set of the publicly-filed moving papers and a copy of this order to all counsel of record

21

in the cases listed on pages 6-8 of the “Class Action Settlement and Release,” including:

22



Price v. Uber Technologies, Inc., Case No. BC554512

23



Del Rio v. Uber Technologies, Inc., Case No. 3:15-cv-3667-EMC

24



Berger v. Uber Technololgies, Inc., Case No. 3:16-cv-41-MEJ

25



In re Uber FCRA Litigation, Case No. 3:14-cv-5200-EMC

26



Ghazi v. Uber Technologies, Inc., Case No. CGC-15-545532

27



Richardson v. Uber Technologies, Inc., Case No. RG15775562

28



Zine v. Uber Technologies, Inc., Case No. BC591351

1



Narsi v. Uber Technologies, Inc., Case No. BC599027

2



Tabola v. Uber Technologies, Inc., Case No. CGC-16-550992

3



Barajas v. Uber Technologies, Inc., Case No. CGC-16-550198

4



Aquino v. Uber Technologies, Inc., Case No. BC608873

5



Adzhemyan v. Uber Technologies, Inc., Case No. BC608874

6



Gollnick v. Uber Technologies, Inc., Case No. CGC-15-547878

7



Mokeddas v. Uber Technologies, Inc., Case No. RG16807483

8



Berwick v. Uber Technologies Inc., Case No. CGC-15-546378

The parties should also serve a complete set of the moving papers to the affected state and federal

10

agencies (i.e., the California Labor and Workforce Development Agency and the National Labor

11

Relations Board).

12
For the Northern District of California

United States District Court

9

The served parties shall file any comments on the proposed settlement by Friday, May 13,

13

2016 at 6:00 p.m. The O’Connor and Yucesoy parties shall file any response to those comments

14

by Thursday, May 19, 2016 at 6:00 p.m. Service shall be effected within two days of the order,

15

and a proof of service filed by Friday, April 29, 2016.

16
17

IT IS SO ORDERED.

18
19
20
21

Dated: April 27, 2016
______________________________________
EDWARD M. CHEN
United States District Judge

22
23
24
25
26
27
28

2