O'Connor et al v. Uber Technologies, Inc. et al

Filing 669

ORDER Re Supplemental Briefing on 518 Plaintiffs' Motion for Preliminary Approval. Signed by Judge Edward M. Chen on 5/31/2016. (emcsec, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/31/2016)

1
2
3
4

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

5

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

6
7

DOUGLAS O'CONNOR, et al.,
Plaintiffs,

8
9
10

v.
UBER TECHNOLOGIES, INC., et al.,
Defendants.

12
For the Northern District of California

United States District Court

11

HAKAN YUCESOY, et al.,

15

Case No. 15-cv-00262-EMC
ORDER RE SUPPLEMENTAL
BRIEFING ON PLAINTIFFS’ MOTION
FOR PRELIMINARY APPROVAL
O’Connor, Docket No. 518
Yucesoy, Docket No. 206

Plaintiffs,

13
14

Case No. 13-cv-03826-EMC

v.
UBER TECHNOLOGIES, INC., et al.,
Defendants

16
17
18

Plaintiffs must file their supplemental Private Attorney General Act (PAGA) notice, sent

19

on April 21, 2016, by 12:00 Noon, Wednesday, June 1, 2016. See Docket No. 611 at 16 n. 14.

20

The parties must also explain the current status of the December 2015 arbitration

21

22
23
24

agreement, including:
(1)

To how many drivers has the December 2015 arbitration agreement been

disseminated in California, Massachusetts, and the United States as a whole?
(2)

Which arbitration agreement has Uber been distributing since the Court’s Rule

25

23(d) order of December, 2015 was issued, and how many drivers have received that arbitration

26

agreement?

27
28

1

The parties’ response is also due by 12:00 Noon, Wednesday, June 1, 2016.

2
3

IT IS SO ORDERED.

4
5
6
7

Dated: May 31, 2016
______________________________________
EDWARD M. CHEN
United States District Judge

8
9
10

12
For the Northern District of California

United States District Court

11

13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21

22
23
24
25
26
27
28

2