O'Connor et al v. Uber Technologies, Inc. et al
Filing
69
ORDER Clarifying December 20, 2013 Order Approving Parties' Stipulation 68 . Signed by Judge Edward M. Chen on 1/24/2014. (emcsec, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/24/2014)
1
2
3
4
5
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
6
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
7
8
DOUGLAS O’CONNOR, et al.,
9
Plaintiffs,
v.
11
For the Northern District of California
United States District Court
10
No. C-13-3826 EMC
UBER TECHNOLOGIES, INC., et al.,
12
Defendants.
___________________________________/
ORDER CLARIFYING DECEMBER 20,
2013 ORDER APPROVING PARTIES’
STIPULATION
(Docket No. 68)
13
14
On December 20, 2013, the Court approved the parties’ stipulation staying the requirement
15
contained in the Court’s December 6 order that the parties meet and confer regarding the form,
16
content, and procedure for issuance of a corrective notice. Docket No. 67. Last week, Defendants
17
requested the Court clarify the scope of the stay. Docket No. 68.
18
The Court hereby issues this clarification. The court-approved stipulation prepared by the
19
parties only requested the Court defer any issuance of a corrective notice. It does not stay
20
Defendants’ obligation to refrain from promulgating new arbitration agreements. Until a corrective
21
notice is approved by the Court and available for distribution or further order, that obligation shall
22
remain in effect.
23
This order disposes of Docket No. 68.
24
IT IS SO ORDERED.
25
26
27
28
Dated: January 24, 2014
_________________________
EDWARD M. CHEN
United States District Judge
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?