O'Connor et al v. Uber Technologies, Inc. et al

Filing 69

ORDER Clarifying December 20, 2013 Order Approving Parties' Stipulation 68 . Signed by Judge Edward M. Chen on 1/24/2014. (emcsec, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/24/2014)

1
2
3
4
5

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

6

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

7
8

DOUGLAS O’CONNOR, et al.,

9

Plaintiffs,
v.

11
For the Northern District of California

United States District Court

10

No. C-13-3826 EMC

UBER TECHNOLOGIES, INC., et al.,

12

Defendants.
___________________________________/

ORDER CLARIFYING DECEMBER 20,
2013 ORDER APPROVING PARTIES’
STIPULATION
(Docket No. 68)

13
14

On December 20, 2013, the Court approved the parties’ stipulation staying the requirement

15

contained in the Court’s December 6 order that the parties meet and confer regarding the form,

16

content, and procedure for issuance of a corrective notice. Docket No. 67. Last week, Defendants

17

requested the Court clarify the scope of the stay. Docket No. 68.

18

The Court hereby issues this clarification. The court-approved stipulation prepared by the

19

parties only requested the Court defer any issuance of a corrective notice. It does not stay

20

Defendants’ obligation to refrain from promulgating new arbitration agreements. Until a corrective

21

notice is approved by the Court and available for distribution or further order, that obligation shall

22

remain in effect.

23

This order disposes of Docket No. 68.

24

IT IS SO ORDERED.

25
26
27
28

Dated: January 24, 2014
_________________________
EDWARD M. CHEN
United States District Judge