O'Connor et al v. Uber Technologies, Inc. et al
Filing
725
ORDER Inviting Comments on Proposed PAGA Settlement. Signed by Judge Edward M. Chen on 6/30/2016. (emcsec, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/30/2016)
1
2
3
4
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
5
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
6
7
DOUGLAS O'CONNOR, et al.,
Plaintiffs,
8
UBER TECHNOLOGIES, INC., et al.,
Defendants.
11
12
For the Northern District of California
United States District Court
ORDER INVITING COMMENTS ON
PROPOSED PAGA SETTLEMENT
v.
9
10
Case No. 13-cv-03826-EMC
On April 21, 2016, Plaintiffs in O’Connor v. Uber Technologies and Yucesoy v. Uber
13
14
Technologies moved for preliminary approval of a class settlement. The proposed settlement will
15
settle civil penalties due per California’s Private Attorney General Act (PAGA) for $1 million,
16
75% of which will go to the state and 25% of which will be distributed to the California class
17
members. The Court now invites comments, if any, by the California Labor and Workforce
18
Development Agency (LWDA) on the proposed PAGA settlement.
The parties are to serve: (1) a complete set of the publicly-filed moving papers, (2) a copy
19
20
of the Court’s Order Re Plaintiffs’ Motion for Preliminary Approval (Docket No. 724), and (3) a
21
copy of this Order on the LWDA, in a manner consistent with the LWDA’s filing requirements.
22
///
23
///
24
///
25
///
26
///
27
///
28
///
1
See The Labor Code Private Attorneys General Act, CALIFORNIA LABOR AND WORKFORCE
2
DEVELOPMENT AGENCY, http://www.labor.ca.gov/Private_Attorneys_General_Act.htm (last
3
visited June 29, 2016). The LWDA may file any comments on the proposed settlement by July
4
15, 2016. Service on the LWDA shall be effected within two days of this Order, and a proof of
5
service filed by July 5, 2016.
6
7
IT IS SO ORDERED.
8
9
10
______________________________________
EDWARD M. CHEN
United States District Judge
12
For the Northern District of California
United States District Court
11
Dated: June 30, 2016
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?