O'Connor et al v. Uber Technologies, Inc. et al

Filing 725

ORDER Inviting Comments on Proposed PAGA Settlement. Signed by Judge Edward M. Chen on 6/30/2016. (emcsec, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/30/2016)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 7 DOUGLAS O'CONNOR, et al., Plaintiffs, 8 UBER TECHNOLOGIES, INC., et al., Defendants. 11 12 For the Northern District of California United States District Court ORDER INVITING COMMENTS ON PROPOSED PAGA SETTLEMENT v. 9 10 Case No. 13-cv-03826-EMC On April 21, 2016, Plaintiffs in O’Connor v. Uber Technologies and Yucesoy v. Uber 13 14 Technologies moved for preliminary approval of a class settlement. The proposed settlement will 15 settle civil penalties due per California’s Private Attorney General Act (PAGA) for $1 million, 16 75% of which will go to the state and 25% of which will be distributed to the California class 17 members. The Court now invites comments, if any, by the California Labor and Workforce 18 Development Agency (LWDA) on the proposed PAGA settlement. The parties are to serve: (1) a complete set of the publicly-filed moving papers, (2) a copy 19 20 of the Court’s Order Re Plaintiffs’ Motion for Preliminary Approval (Docket No. 724), and (3) a 21 copy of this Order on the LWDA, in a manner consistent with the LWDA’s filing requirements. 22 /// 23 /// 24 /// 25 /// 26 /// 27 /// 28 /// 1 See The Labor Code Private Attorneys General Act, CALIFORNIA LABOR AND WORKFORCE 2 DEVELOPMENT AGENCY, http://www.labor.ca.gov/Private_Attorneys_General_Act.htm (last 3 visited June 29, 2016). The LWDA may file any comments on the proposed settlement by July 4 15, 2016. Service on the LWDA shall be effected within two days of this Order, and a proof of 5 service filed by July 5, 2016. 6 7 IT IS SO ORDERED. 8 9 10 ______________________________________ EDWARD M. CHEN United States District Judge 12 For the Northern District of California United States District Court 11 Dated: June 30, 2016 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?