O'Connor et al v. Uber Technologies, Inc. et al
Filing
752
STIPULATION AND ORDER TO CHANGE STATUS CONFERENCE DEADLINES filed by Uber Technologies, Inc., Travis Kalanick. Case Management Statement due by 10/11/2016. Further Case Management Conference set for Tuesday 10/18/2016 10:30 AM in Courtroom 5, 17th Floor, San Francisco. Signed by Judge Edward M. Chen on 8/26/16. (bpfS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/26/2016)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
SHANNON LISS-RIORDAN, pro hac vice
ADELAIDE PAGANO, pro hac vice
LICHTEN & LISS-RIORDAN, P.C.
729 Boylston Street, Suite 2000
Boston, MA 02116
Telephone:
(617) 994-5800
Facsimile:
(617) 994-5801
sliss@llrlaw.com
apagano@llrlaw.com
GIBSON, DUNN & CRUTCHER LLP
THEODORE J. BOUTROUS, JR., SBN 132099
tboutrous@gibsondunn.com
THEANE D. EVANGELIS, SBN 243570
tevangelis@gibsondunn.com
DHANANJAY S. MANTHRIPRAGADA,
SBN 254433
dmanthripragada@gibsondunn.com
333 South Grand Avenue
Los Angeles, CA 90071-3197
Telephone:
213.229.7000
Facsimile:
213.229.7520
MATTHEW CARLSON (SBN 273242)
LICHTEN & LISS-RIORDAN, P.C.
466 Geary St., Suite 201
San Francisco, CA 94102
Telephone:
(617) 994-5800
Facsimile:
(617) 994-5801
mcarlson@llrlaw.com
JOSHUA S. LIPSHUTZ, SBN 242557
jlipshutz@gibsondunn.com
KEVIN J. RING-DOWELL, SBN 278289
kringdowell@gibsondunn.com
555 Mission Street, Suite 3000
San Francisco, CA 94105-0921
Telephone:
415.393.8200
Facsimile:
415.393.8306
Attorneys for O’Connor Plaintiffs
THOMAS COLOPY, MATTHEW MANAHAN,
and ELIE GURFINKEL, individually and
on behalf of all others similarly situated;
Attorneys for Yucesoy Plaintiffs
Attorneys for Defendants
UBER TECHNOLOGIES, INC. and
TRAVIS KALANICK
15
16
17
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
CASE NO. 13-cv-03826-EMC
CASE NO. 15-cv-00262-EMC
DOUGLAS O’CONNOR, et al.,
Plaintiffs,
v.
JOINT STIPULATION TO CHANGE
STATUS CONFERENCE DEADLINES
UBER TECHNOLOGIES, INC.,
Defendant.
Judge: Hon. Edward M. Chen
HAKAN YUCESOY, et al.,
Plaintiffs,
v.
UBER TECHNOLOGIES, INC., et al.
Defendant.
27
28
1
JOINT STIPULATION TO CHANGE STATUS CONFERENCE DEADLINES
CASE NO. CV 13-03826-EMC; CASE NO. CV 15-00262-EMC
1
JOINT STIPULATION TO CHANGE STATUS CONFERENCE DEADLINES
2
O’Connor Plaintiffs Thomas Colopy, Matthew Manahan, and Elie Gurfinkel, individually and
3
on behalf of all others similarly situated, Yucesoy Plaintiffs Hakan Yucesoy, Abdi Mahammed,
4
Mokhtar Talha, Brian Morris, and Pedro Sanchez, individually and on behalf of all others similarly
5
situated (collectively, “Plaintiffs”), and Defendants Uber Technologies, Inc. (“Uber”) and Travis
6
Kalanick (as to Yucesoy only) (collectively, “Defendants”), by and through their respective counsel of
7
record, hereby stipulate as follows:
8
WHEREAS, on April 21, 2016, Plaintiffs filed motions for preliminary settlement approval in
9
O’Connor v. Uber Techs., Inc., 13-cv-03826-EMC (N.D. Cal.) and Yucesoy v. Uber Techs., Inc., No.
10
11
12
15-cv-00262-EMC (N.D. Cal.), see O’Connor, Dkt. 518; Yucesoy Dkt. 206;
WHEREAS, on August 18, 2016, this Court denied Plaintiffs’ motions for preliminary
settlement approval, see O’Connor, Dkt. 748; Yucesoy Dkt. 240;
13
WHEREAS, in its order denying preliminary settlement approval, the Court directed the
14
parties to submit a joint status report on September 8, 2016 and scheduled a status conference for
15
September 15, 2016 at 10:30 a.m., see O’Connor, Dkt. 748 at 35; Yucesoy Dkt. 240 at 35;
16
WHEREAS, Plaintiffs’ lead counsel has an oral argument scheduled in the United States
17
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit on September 15, 2016 and Defendants’ lead counsel has an
18
oral argument scheduled in the California Court of Appeal on September 15, 2016;
19
WHEREAS, both Plaintiffs’ lead counsel and Defendants’ lead counsel have a variety of oral
20
arguments and trial-related commitments in the weeks immediately preceding and immediately
21
following September 15, 2016;
22
WHEREAS, the Parties are continuing to discuss potential settlement possibilities for
23
O’Connor and Yucesoy, in light of the Court’s order denying preliminary settlement approval.
24
NOW THEREFORE, the Parties hereby stipulate, subject to the approval of this Court, that
October 18, 2016
the Status Conference in O’Connor and Yucesoy will be rescheduled to October 13, 2016 at 10:30
11
a.m. and the joint status report shall be due on October 6, 2016.
25
26
27
IT IS SO STIPULATED
28
2
JOINT STIPULATION TO CHANGE STATUS CONFERENCE DEADLINES
CASE NO. CV 13-03826-EMC; CASE NO. CV 15-00262-EMC
1
2
Dated: August 23, 2016
GIBSON, DUNN & CRUTCHER LLP
3
By:
4
5
Attorney for Defendants Uber Technologies, Inc.
and Travis Kalanick
6
7
/s/ Theodore J. Boutrous Jr.
Theodore J. Boutrous Jr.
Dated: August 23, 2016
LICHTEN & LISS-RIORDAN, P.C.
8
By:
9
10
/s/ Shannon Liss-Riordan
Shannon Liss-Riordan
Attorneys for O’Connor Plaintiffs Thomas Colopy,
Matthew Manahan, and Elie Gurfinkel, individually
and on behalf of all others similarly situated;
Attorneys for Yucesoy Plaintiffs
11
12
13
14
PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED.
16
20
DERED
SO OR ED
IT IS _________________
DIFI
AS MO
R NIA
August 26
Dated: ______________, 2016
21
RT
22
ER
H
23
24
FO
NO
The Honorable Edward M. Chen
United States District Judgehen
C
ard M.
dge Edw
Ju
LI
19
UNIT
ED
18
S DISTRICT
TE
C
TA
RT
U
O
S
17
(as modified on p.2)
A
15
[PROPOSED] ORDER
N
F
D IS T IC T O
R
25
26
27
28
3
JOINT STIPULATION TO CHANGE STATUS CONFERENCE DEADLINES
CASE NO. CV 13-03826-EMC; CASE NO. CV 15-00262-EMC
C
1
ECF ATTESTATION
2
I hereby attest that I have on file all holographic signatures corresponding to any signatures indicated
by a conformed signature (/s/) within this e-filed document.
3
4
5
By:
/s/
Kevin Ring-Dowell
Kevin Ring-Dowell
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
4
JOINT STIPULATION TO CHANGE STATUS CONFERENCE DEADLINES
CASE NO. CV 13-03826-EMC; CASE NO. CV 15-00262-EMC
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?