O'Connor et al v. Uber Technologies, Inc. et al

Filing 783

STIPULATION AND ORDER RESETTING FURTHER CMC. Case Management Statement due by 3/16/2017. Further Case Management Conference reset from 2/2/2017 to 3/23/2017 11:00 AM in Courtroom 5, 17th Floor, San Francisco. Signed by Judge Edward M. Chen on 1/24/17. (bpfS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/24/2017)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27

GIBSON, DUNN & CRUTCHER LLP
THEODORE J. BOUTROUS, JR., SBN 132099
[e-mail]
THEANE D. EVANGELIS, SBN 243570
[e-mail]
DHANANJAY S. MANTHRIPRAGADA, SBN
254433
[e-mail]
333 South Grand Avenue
Los Angeles, CA 90071-3197
Telephone:
213.229.7000
Facsimile:
213.229.7520
JOSHUA S. LIPSHUTZ, SBN 242557
[e-mail]
KEVIN J. RING-DOWELL, SBN 278289
[e-mail]
555 Mission Street, Suite 3000
San Francisco, CA 94105-0921
Telephone:
415.393.8200
Facsimile:
415.393.8306

LICHTEN & LISS-RIORDAN, P.C.
SHANNON LISS-RIORDAN, SBN 310719
[e-mail]
ADELAIDE PAGANO, pro hac vice
[e-mail]
729 Boylston Street, Suite 2000
Boston, MA 02116
Telephone:
617.994.5800
Facsimile:
617.994.5801
LICHTEN & LISS-RIORDAN, P.C.
MATTHEW CARLSON, SBN 273242
[e-mail]
466 Geary St., Suite 201
San Francisco, CA 94102
Telephone:
617.994.5800
Facsimile:
617.994.5801
Attorneys for O’Connor and
Yucesoy Plaintiffs
[Additional Counsel Listed on Following Page]

Attorneys for Uber Technologies, Inc., Rasier,
LLC, and Travis Kalanick
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
DOUGLAS O’CONNOR, et al.,
Plaintiffs,
v.
UBER TECHNOLOGIES, INC.,
Defendant.
HAKAN YUCESOY, et al.,
Plaintiffs,
v.
UBER TECHNOLOGIES, INC., et al.
Defendants.

CASE NO. 13-cv-03826-EMC
CASE NO. 14-cv-05200-EMC
CASE NO. 15-cv-00262-EMC
CASE NO. 15-cv-03667-EMC
CASE NO. 16-cv-03134-EMC
JOINT STIPULATION TO RESCHEDULE
CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE
Judge: Hon. Edward M. Chen

IN RE UBER FCRA LITIGATION
RICARDO DEL RIO, et al.,
Plaintiffs,
v.
UBER TECHNOLOGIES, INC., et al.
Defendants.

28
Gibson, Dunn &
Crutcher LLP

JOINT STIPULATION
CASE NOS. 13-CV-03826-EMC; 14-CV-05200; 15-CV-00262-EMC; 15-CV-03667; 16-CV-03134

1
2
3
4

TODD JOHNSTON, et al.,
Plaintiffs,
v.
UBER TECHNOLOGIES, INC.
Defendant.

5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23

LITTLER MENDELSON, P.C.
ANDREW M. SPURCHISE, SBN 245998
[e-mail]
333 Bush Street, 34th Floor
San Francisco, CA 94104
Tel: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
Attorneys for Uber Technologies, Inc. and
Rasier, LLC
THE BRANDI LAW FIRM
Thomas J. Brandi, SBN 53208
[e-mail]
Brian J. Malloy, SBN 234882
[e-mail]
354 Pine Street, Third Floor
San Francisco, CA 94104
415.989.1800
SLACK & DAVIS, LLP
Michael L. Slack, pro hac vice
[e-mail]
John R. Davis, SBN 308412
[e-mail]
2705 Bee Cave Road, Suite 220
Austin, TX 78746
Attorneys for Johnston Plaintiff Todd Johnston

HAMNER LAW OFFICES, APC
CHRISTOPHER J. HAMNER, SBN 197117
[e-mail]
AMY T. WOOTTON, SBN 188856
[e-mail]
555 W. 5th Street, 31st Floor
Los Angeles, California 90013
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: 213.533.4167
GERAGOS & GERAGOS, APC
MARK J. GERAGOS, SBN 108325
[e-mail]
BENJAMIN MEISELAS, SBN 227412
[e-mail]
644 South Figueroa Street
Los Angeles, California 90017
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: 213.232.3255
KABATECK BROWN KELLNER LLP
BRIAN KABATECK, SBN 152054
[e-mail]
SHANT A. KARNIKIAN, SBN 285048
[e-mail]
644 South Figueroa Street
Los Angeles, California 90017
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: 213.217.5010
Attorneys for Del Rio Plaintiffs and Douglas
O’Connor individually

24
25
26
27
28
Gibson, Dunn &
Crutcher LLP

JOINT STIPULATION
CASE NOS. 13-CV-03826-EMC; 14-CV-05200; 15-CV-00262-EMC; 15-CV-03667; 16-CV-03134

1

STIPULATION TO RESCHEDULE CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE

2

Pursuant to Civil Local Rule 7-12, the O’Connor Plaintiffs, the Yucesoy Plaintiffs, the Del Rio

3

Plaintiffs, the Johnston Plaintiffs, and Defendants Uber Technologies, Inc. (“Uber”), Rasier, LLC

4

(“Rasier”), and Travis Kalanick (together, the “Defendants”) (together with the Plaintiffs, the

5

“Parties”), by and through their respective counsel of record, hereby stipulate as follows:1

6

WHEREAS, the court presiding over the case captioned Steven Price v. Uber Technologies,

7

Inc., Los Angeles Superior Court Case No. BC554512 (“Price”) previously set a hearing on the Price

8

parties’ forthcoming joint request for approval of a Private Attorneys General Act (“PAGA”)

9

settlement in the Price matter (“Joint Request”) for January 23, 2017;

10
11

WHEREAS, on November 21, 2016, the Court stayed each of the five above-captioned cases
until the next scheduled Case Management Conference (“CMC”);

12
13

WHEREAS, the Court set the date of the next CMC for February 2, 2017, at 11:00 a.m., see
O’Connor Dkt. 769, in part based on the date of the Price settlement hearing;

14

WHEREAS, the Price Court, acting sua sponte, rescheduled the date of the Price settlement

15

hearing from January 23, 2017, to April 25, 2017, because the Price Court was no longer available to

16

conduct the settlement approval hearing on January 23, 2017;

17
18

WHEREAS, the Price parties thereafter held a scheduling conference with the Price Court,
during which the Price Court rescheduled the settlement approval hearing for March 8, 2017;

19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
Gibson, Dunn &
Crutcher LLP

1

The In re Uber FCRA Litigation Plaintiffs would not agree to change the date of the forthcoming
Case Management Conference in In re Uber FCRA Litigation, Case No. 14-cv-05200-EMC, and
therefore are not party to this stipulation. However, with this filing, Defendants request that the
Case Management Conference and accompanying Case Management Conference statement filing
deadline for In re Uber FCRA Litigation also be changed to March 23, 2017 and March 16, 2017,
respectively, so that all Case Management Conferences and accompanying deadlines may take
place on the same date.
If the Case Management Conference for the In re Uber FCRA Litigation is not changed, then the
O’Connor and Yucesoy plaintiffs do not agree to postpone their Case Management Conference,
unless the In re Uber FCRA Litigation conference is used solely to discuss the scheduling and
status of the settlement agreement in that case.
1
JOINT STIPULATION
CASE NOS. 13-CV-03826-EMC; 14-CV-05200; 15-CV-00262-EMC; 15-CV-03667; 16-CV-03134

1

WHEREAS, this Court indicated that it wanted to schedule the next Case Management

2

Conference for a date after the Price Court has conducted the settlement approval hearing, and if the

3

Court still desires to hold the Conference after that date;

4

NOW THEREFORE, the Parties hereby stipulate, subject to the approval of this Court, that:

5

1.

6

March 23, 2017.

7

2.

Case Management Conference Statements shall be due on March 16, 2017.

8

3.

Each of the above-captioned cases shall remain STAYED until the next Case

9
10
11
12

The Case Management Conference set for February 2, 2017, shall be reset for

Management Conference.
IT IS SO STIPULATED
Dated: January 20, 2017

13

Respectfully submitted,
GIBSON, DUNN & CRUTCHER LLP

14
/s/ Theodore J. Boutrous, Jr.
Theodore J. Boutrous, Jr.
Attorneys for Defendants Uber Technologies, Inc., Rasier,
LLC, and Travis Kalanick

15
16
17
18

Dated: January 20, 2017

Respectfully submitted,
LICHTEN & LISS-RIORDAN, P.C.

19
20

/s/ Shannon Liss-Riordan
Shannon Liss-Riordan
Attorneys for O’Connor and Yucesoy Plaintiffs

21
22
23
24
25
26
27

Dated: January 20, 2017

Respectfully submitted,
LITTLER MENDELSON, P.C.
/s/ Andrew M. Spurchise
Andrew M. Spurchise
Attorneys for Defendants Uber Technologies, Inc.
and Rasier, LLC

28
Gibson, Dunn &
Crutcher LLP

2
JOINT STIPULATION
CASE NOS. 13-CV-03826-EMC; 14-CV-05200; 15-CV-00262-EMC; 15-CV-03667; 16-CV-03134

1

Dated: January 20, 2017

Respectfully submitted,

2

GERAGOS & GERAGOS, APC

3

/s/ Mark J. Geragos
Mark J. Geragos
Attorneys for Del Rio Plaintiffs and Douglas O’Connor

4
5
6
7

Dated: January 20, 2017

Respectfully submitted,
THE BRANDI LAW FIRM

8
9

/s/ Brian J. Malloy
Brian J. Malloy
Attorneys for Plaintiff Todd Johnston

10
11
12
13

[PROPOSED] ORDER

14

PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED.

to 3/23/17 at 11:00 a.m.

16

S

RT

ER

H

22

24

en
d M. Ch
e Edwar
Judg

NO

21

Dated: ___________, 2017

R NIA

20

D
RDERE
S SO O IED
IT I
DIF
AS MO

FO

19

shall be filed by 3/16/17.

LI

UNIT
ED

18

S DISTRICT
TE
C
TA

N

OF

C

D I S____________________________________
T RICT
The Honorable Edward M. Chen
United States District Judge

25
26
27
28
Gibson, Dunn &
Crutcher LLP

An

updated joint CMC statement

RT
U
O

17

23

The CMC is reset from 2/2/17

A

15

3
JOINT STIPULATION
CASE NOS. 13-CV-03826-EMC; 14-CV-05200; 15-CV-00262-EMC; 15-CV-03667; 16-CV-03134

1
2
3
4

I, Kevin Ring-Dowell, hereby attest that concurrence in the filing of this document has been
obtained from counsel for all parties.
Dated: January 20, 2017

By:

/s/ Kevin Ring-Dowell.
Kevin Ring-Dowell

5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
Gibson, Dunn &
Crutcher LLP

4
JOINT STIPULATION
CASE NOS. 13-CV-03826-EMC; 14-CV-05200; 15-CV-00262-EMC; 15-CV-03667; 16-CV-03134