O'Connor et al v. Uber Technologies, Inc. et al

Filing 810

STIPULATION AND ORDER RESETTING CMC. Case Management Statement due by 8/17/2017. Further Case Management Conference reset from 6/29/2017 to 8/24/2017 11:00 AM in Courtroom 5, 17th Floor, San Francisco. Signed by Judge Edward M. Chen on 6/8/17. (bpfS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/8/2017)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28

GIBSON, DUNN & CRUTCHER LLP
THEODORE J. BOUTROUS, JR., SBN 132099
[e-mail]
THEANE D. EVANGELIS, SBN 243570
[e-mail]
DHANANJAY MANTHRIPRAGADA, SBN 254433
[e-mail]
333 South Grand Avenue
Los Angeles, CA 90071-3197
Telephone:
213.229.7000
Facsimile:
213.229.7520
JOSHUA S. LIPSHUTZ, SBN 242557
[e-mail]
KEVIN J. RING-DOWELL, SBN 278289
[e-mail]
555 Mission Street, Suite 3000
San Francisco, CA 94105-0921
Telephone:
415.393.8200
Facsimile:
415.393.8306

LITTLER MENDELSON, P.C.
ANDREW M. SPURCHISE, SBN 245998
[e-mail]
900 Third Ave.
New York, NY 10022
Tel: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
ROD FLIEGEL, SBN 168289
[e-mail]
333 Bush Street, 34th Floor
San Francisco, CA 94104
Tel: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
Attorneys for Uber Technologies, Inc. and
Rasier, LLC
[Additional Counsel Listed on Next Page]

Attorneys for Uber Technologies, Inc., Rasier, LLC,
and Travis Kalanick
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
DOUGLAS O’CONNOR, et al.,
Plaintiffs,
v.
UBER TECHNOLOGIES, INC.
Defendant.

CASE NO. 13-cv-03826-EMC
CASE NO. 14-cv-05200-EMC
CASE NO. 15-cv-00262-EMC
CASE NO. 15-cv-03667-EMC
CASE NO. 16-cv-03134-EMC

HAKAN YUCESOY, et al.,
Plaintiffs,
v.
UBER TECHNOLOGIES, INC., et al.
Defendant.

JOINT STIPULATION TO RESCHEDULE
CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE
JUDGE: HON. EDWARD M. CHEN

IN RE UBER FCRA LITIGATION
RICARDO DEL RIO, et al.,
Plaintiffs,
v.
UBER TECHNOLOGIES, INC., et al.
Defendants.
TODD JOHNSTON, et al.,
Plaintiffs,
v.
UBER TECHNOLOGIES, INC.
Defendant.

Gibson, Dunn &
Crutcher LLP

JOINT STIPULATION; CASE NOS. 13-CV-03826; 14-CV-05200; 15-CV-00262; 15-CV-03667; 16-CV-03134

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28

GOLDSTEIN, BORGEN, DARDARIAN & HO
LAURA L. HO, SBN 173179
[e-mail]
ANDREW P. LEE, SBN 245903
[e-mail]
WILLIAM C. JHAVERI-WEEKS, SBN 289984
[e-mail]
300 Lakeside Drive, Suite 1000
Oakland, CA 94612
Tel: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
AHDOOT & WOLFSON, PC
TINA WOLFSON, SBN 174806
[e-mail]
ROBERT AHDOOT, SBN 172098
[e-mail]
THEODORE W. MAYA, SBN 223242
[e-mail]
BRADLEY K. KING, SBN 274399
[e-mail]
1016 Palm Avenue
West Hollywood, CA 90069
Tel: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
Attorneys for In re Uber FCRA Plaintiffs
THE BRANDI LAW FIRM
Thomas J. Brandi, SBN 53208
[e-mail]
Brian J. Malloy, SBN 234882
[e-mail]
354 Pine Street, Third Floor
San Francisco, CA 94104
415.989.1800
SLACK & DAVIS, LLP
Michael L. Slack, pro hac vice
[e-mail]
John R. Davis, SBN 308412
[e-mail]
2705 Bee Cave Road, Suite 220
Austin, TX 78746
Attorneys for Johnston Plaintiff Todd Johnston

HAMNER LAW OFFICES, APC
CHRISTOPHER J. HAMNER, SBN 197117
[e-mail]
AMY T. WOOTTON, SBN 188856
[e-mail]
555 W. 5th Street, 31st Floor
Los Angeles, California 90013
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: 213.533.4167
GERAGOS & GERAGOS, APC
MARK J. GERAGOS, SBN 108325
[e-mail]
BENJAMIN MEISELAS, SBN 227412
[e-mail]
644 South Figueroa Street
Los Angeles, California 90017
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: 213.232.3255
KABATECK BROWN KELLNER LLP
BRIAN KABATECK, SBN 152054
[e-mail]
SHANT A. KARNIKIAN, SBN 285048
[e-mail]
644 South Figueroa Street
Los Angeles, California 90017
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: 213.217.5010
Attorneys for Del Rio Plaintiffs and Douglas
O’Connor individually
LICHTEN & LISS-RIORDAN, P.C.
Shannon Lis-Riordan (SBN 310719)
[e-mail]
Adelaide Pagano, pro hac vice
[e-mail]
729 Boylston Street, Suite 2000
Boston, MA 02116
Telephone:
617.994.5800
Facsimile:
617.994.5801
Matthew Carlson (SBN 273242)
[e-mail]
466 Geary St., Suite 201
San Francisco, CA 94102
Telephone:
415.630.2651
Facsimile:
617.994.5801
Attorneys for O’Connor and the Yucesoy
Plaintiffs

Gibson, Dunn &
Crutcher LLP

JOINT STIPULATION; CASE NOS. 13-CV-03826; 14-CV-05200; 15-CV-00262; 15-CV-03667; 16-CV-03134

1
2
3
4
5

STIPULATION TO RESCHEDULE CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE
Pursuant to Civil Local Rule 7-12, all parties in the above-captioned cases, by and through
their respective counsel of record, hereby stipulate as follows:
WHEREAS, on November 21, 2016, the Court stayed each of the above-captioned cases until
the next scheduled Case Management Conference;

6

WHEREAS, on January 24, 2017, the Court granted the parties’ stipulation to reschedule the

7

next Case Management Conference in the above-captioned cases to March 23, 2017, at 11:00 a.m., to

8

account for a change in the hearing date for the PAGA settlement approval hearing in Price v. Uber

9

Technologies, Inc., Los Angeles Superior Court, Case No. BC554512;

10

WHEREAS on February 7, 2017, the Court granted the parties’ stipulation to reschedule the

11

Case Management Conference in the above-captioned cases to March 22, 2017, at 10:00 a.m., in light

12

of certain scheduling conflicts;

13

WHEREAS, the Price Court held a PAGA settlement approval hearing on March 10, 2017

14

and declined to enter a final order regarding the Price parties’ joint motion for PAGA settlement

15

approval;

16

WHEREAS, the Price Court ordered further supplemental briefing pertaining to the Price

17

parties’ joint motion for PAGA settlement approval to be submitted on or before March 24, 2017, and

18

scheduled a second PAGA settlement approval hearing for May 2, 2017;

19

WHEREAS, this Court held a case management conference in the above-referenced cases on

20

March 22, 2017, during which the Court held that the existing stays in the above-referenced cases

21

would remain in place, with the exception of certain settlement-related briefing in the In re Uber

22

FCRA Litigation and certain arbitration-related briefing in the Johnston litigation;

23

WHEREAS, this Court indicated that it wanted to schedule the next Case Management

24

Conference in the above-captioned cases for a date after the Price Court has completed its PAGA

25

settlement approval hearing, see, e.g., O’Connor, Dkt. 803 at 2 (“The Court will continue to monitor

26

the Price PAGA settlement, wherein the hearing to approve settlement is set for 5/2/17. If the case

27

does not settle, the parties shall address whether and how PAGA claims pending or proposed in Del

28

Rio and O’Connor should be handled in the next CMC statement.”);

Gibson, Dunn &
Crutcher LLP

1
JOINT STIPULATION; CASE NOS. 13-CV-03826; 14-CV-05200; 15-CV-00262; 15-CV-03667; 16-CV-03134

1
2

WHEREAS, on April 28, 2017, the Price Court rescheduled the Price PAGA settlement
approval hearing to June 2, 2016, due to the Price Court’s unavailability on May 2, 2017;

3

WHEREAS, on May 23, 2017, the Price Court rescheduled the Price PAGA settlement

4

approval hearing to June 30, 2016, in order to permit the California Department of Industrial

5

Relations to submit an amicus brief regarding the Price PAGA settlement;

6
7

WHEREAS, the Price PAGA settlement approval hearing is currently scheduled to take place
on June 30, 2016, after the case management conference in the above-referenced cases;

8

NOW THEREFORE, the Parties hereby stipulate, subject to the approval of this Court, that:

9

1.

10
11
12
13

The Case Management Conference in the above-captioned cases set for June 29, 2017,

at 11:00 a.m., shall be reset for August 24, 2017, at 11:00 a.m.
2.

Case Management Conference Statements in the above-captioned cases shall be due

on August 17, 2017.
3.

Each of the above-captioned cases shall remain STAYED until the next Case

14

Management Conference, with the exception of settlement-related briefing in the In re Uber FCRA

15

Litigation and certain arbitration-related briefing in the Johnston litigation.

16
17
18

IT IS SO STIPULATED
Dated: June 5, 2017

19

GIBSON, DUNN & CRUTCHER LLP

20

/s/ Theodore J. Boutrous, Jr.
Theodore J. Boutrous, Jr.
Attorneys for Defendants Uber Technologies, Inc., Rasier,
LLC, and Travis Kalanick

21
22
23
24
25
26
27

Respectfully submitted,

Dated: June 5, 2017

Respectfully submitted,
LICHTEN & LISS-RIORDAN, P.C.
/s/ Shannon Liss-Riordan
Shannon Liss-Riordan
Attorneys for O’Connor and Yucesoy Plaintiffs

28
Gibson, Dunn &
Crutcher LLP

2
JOINT STIPULATION; CASE NOS. 13-CV-03826; 14-CV-05200; 15-CV-00262; 15-CV-03667; 16-CV-03134

1

Dated: June 5, 2017

Respectfully submitted,

2

LITTLER MENDELSON, P.C.

3

/s/ Andrew M. Spurchise
Andrew M. Spurchise
Attorneys for Defendants Uber Technologies, Inc.
and Rasier, LLC

4
5
6

Dated: June 5, 2017

Respectfully submitted,

7

GOLDSTEIN, BORGEN, DARDARIAN & HO

8

/s/ Laura L. Ho
Laura L. Ho
Attorneys for In re Uber FCRA Plaintiffs

9
10
11

Dated: June 5, 2017

KABATECK BROWN KELLNER LLP

12

/s/ Brian Kabateck
Brian Kabateck
Attorneys for Del Rio Plaintiffs and Douglas O’Connor

13
14
15

Respectfully submitted,

Dated: June 5, 2017

Respectfully submitted,

16

THE BRANDI LAW FIRM

17

/s/ Brian J. Malloy
Brian J. Malloy
Attorneys for Plaintiff Todd Johnston

18
19
20

25

RT

28

____________________________________
The Honorable Edward Chen
M. M. Chen
United ge Edward
d States District Judge
Ju

NO

27

June 8

Dated: ___________, 2017

DERED

O OR
IT IS S

FO

26

UNIT
ED

24

S DISTRICT
TE
C
TA

ER

Crutcher LLP

A

H

Gibson, Dunn &

RT
U
O

S

23

R NIA

22

PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED.

LI

21

[PROPOSED] ORDER

N

F
D IS T IC T O
R

C

3
JOINT STIPULATION; CASE NOS. 13-CV-03826; 14-CV-05200; 15-CV-00262; 15-CV-03667; 16-CV-03134

1
2
3
4

I, Kevin Ring-Dowell, hereby attest that concurrence in the filing of this document has been
obtained from counsel for all parties.
Dated: June 5, 2017

By:

/s/ Kevin Ring-Dowell
Kevin Ring-Dowell

5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
Gibson, Dunn &
Crutcher LLP

4
JOINT STIPULATION; CASE NOS. 13-CV-03826; 14-CV-05200; 15-CV-00262; 15-CV-03667; 16-CV-03134