O'Connor et al v. Uber Technologies, Inc. et al

Filing 891

STIPULATION AND ORDER as to (296 in 3:15-cv-00262-EMC) MOTION to Compel Arbitration and/or MOTION to Dismiss Plaintiffs' Fifth Amended Class Action Complaint. Responses due by 8/2/2018. Replies due by 8/20/2018. Motion Hearing reset for 9/6/2018 01:30 PM in San Francisco, Courtroom 05, 17th Floor before Judge Edward M. Chen. Case Management Statement due by 8/30/2018. Further Case Management Conference set for 9/6/2018 01:30 PM in San Francisco, Courtroom 05, 17th Floor. Signed by Judge Edward M. Chen on 6/20/18. (bpf, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/20/2018)

1
2
3
4
5
6

SHANNON LISS-RIORDAN, SBN 310719
[e-mail]
ADELAIDE PAGANO, pro hac vice
[e-mail]
LICHTEN & LISS-RIORDAN, P.C.
729 Boylston Street, Suite 2000
Boston, MA 02116
Telephone:
[phone]
Facsimile:
[phone]

7
8

Attorneys O’Connor Plaintiffs
and Yucesoy Plaintiffs

9
10
11
12
13
14

DOUGLAS O’CONNOR, et al.,

17
18
19
20

JOSHUA S. LIPSHUTZ, SBN 242557
[e-mail]
PETER C. SQUERI, SBN 286249
[e-mail]
555 Mission Street, Suite 3000
San Francisco, CA 94105-0921
Telephone:
415.393.8200
Facsimile:
415.393.8306
Attorneys for Defendants

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

15
16

GIBSON DUNN & CRUTCHER LLP
THEODORE J. BOUTROUS, JR., SBN 132099
[e-mail]
THEANE D. EVANGELIS, SBN 243570
[e-mail]
DHANANJAY S. MANTHRIPRAGADA,
SBN 254433
[e-mail]
333 South Grand Avenue
Los Angeles, CA 90071-3197
Telephone:
213.229.7000
Facsimile:
213.229.7520

CASE NO. 13-cv-03826-EMC
CASE NO. 15-cv-00262-EMC

Plaintiffs,

JOINT STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED]
ORDER TO CONTINUE CASE
MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE AND
HEARING AND ADJUST BRIEFING
SCHEDULE

v.
UBER TECHNOLOGIES, INC.,
Defendant.

21
22
23
24
25

Judge: Hon. Edward M. Chen
HAKAN YUCESOY, et al.,
Plaintiffs,
v.
UBER TECHNOLOGIES, INC., et al.
Defendants.

26
27
28

1
J OINT STIPULATION TO CONTINUE CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE AND HEARING AND
ADJ UST BRIEFING SCHEDULE – CASE NO. CV 13-03826-EMC; CASE No. CV 15-00262-EMC

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9

Pursuant to Civil Local Rule 7-12, the O’Connor Plaintiffs and Yucesoy Plaintiffs
(collectively, “Plaintiffs”), and Defendants Uber Technologies, Inc. (“Uber”) and Travis
Kalanick (as to the Yucesoy action only) (collectively, “Defendants”), by and through their
respective counsel of record, hereby stipulate as follows:
WHEREAS, the next Case Management Conference for both the O’Connor and Yucesoy
actions, and the hearing on Defendants’ motion to compel arbitration and/or dismiss in the
Yucesoy action (Yucesoy Dkt. 296), is currently set for July 27, 2018;
WHEREAS, the Parties have conferred and agree that, due to various obligations, and to

10

have additional time to complete the briefing on the Yucesoy motion, they would prefer for the

11

O’Connor and Yucesoy CMC, and the Yucesoy hearing, to be continued to August 30, 2018, for

12

the deadline for Plaintiffs to file their opposition in Yucesoy to be moved to August 2, 2018, and

13

for the deadline for Defendants to file their reply in Yucesoy to be moved to August 20, 2018;

14
15

NOW THEREFORE, the Parties hereby stipulate, agree, and respectfully request that the
Court enter an Order establishing the following:

16

1. Plaintiffs shall file their opposition papers in Yucesoy on or before August 2, 2018;

17

2. Defendants shall file their reply papers in Yucesoy on or before August 20, 2018;

18

3. The hearing in Yucesoy and CMC in O’Connor and Yucesoy shall be continued to August

19

30, 2018. September 6, 2018 at 1:30 p.m.

20
21

IT IS SO STIPULATED

22

Dated: June 19, 2018

23
24
25

GIBSON, DUNN & CRUTCHER LLP
By:
/s/ Dhananjay S. Manthripragada
Dhananjay S. Manthripragada
Attorneys for Defendants Uber Technologies, Inc.
and Travis Kalanick

26
27
28

2
J OINT STIPULATION TO CONTINUE CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE AND HEARING AND
ADJ UST BRIEFING SCHEDULE – CASE NO. CV 13-03826-EMC; CASE No. CV 15-00262-EMC

1
2
3
4
5

Dated: June 19, 2018

LICHTEN & LISS-RIORDAN, P.C.
By:

/s/ Shannon Liss-Riordan
Shannon Liss-Riordan

Attorneys for O’Connor Plaintiffs and Yucesoy
Plaintiffs

6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28

3
J OINT STIPULATION TO CONTINUE CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE AND HEARING AND
ADJ UST BRIEFING SCHEDULE – CASE NO. CV 13-03826-EMC; CASE No. CV 15-00262-EMC

[PROPOSED] ORDER
PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED.

Hearing reset for 9/6/18
at 1:30 p.m.

3

S DISTRICT
TE
C
TA

S

ER

. Chen

A

N

F
D IS T IC T O
R

C

ECF ATTESTATION

9

11

dward M
Judge E

H

8

10

IT IS
DIFIED
AS MO

LI

7

RT

6

5

RT
U
O

____________________________________
The Honorable D
DERE Edward M. Chen
SO OR
NO

6/20
Dated: ___________, 2018

UNIT
ED

4

R NIA

2

FO

1

I hereby attest that concurrence in the filing of this document has been obtained from
counsel for all parties.
Dated: June 19, 2018

LICHTEN & LISS-RIORDAN P.C.

12

By /s/ Shannon Liss-Riordan
Shannon Liss-Riordan
Attorneys for Plaintiffs

13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28

4
J OINT STIPULATION TO CONTINUE CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE AND HEARING AND
ADJ UST BRIEFING SCHEDULE – CASE NO. CV 13-03826-EMC; CASE No. CV 15-00262-EMC