Thieme v. Cobb et al
Filing
114
ORDER VACATING PRETRIAL DEADLINES. Case Management Statement due by 11/19/2015. Case Management Conference set for 12/3/2015 10:00 AM. Signed by Judge Maria-Elena James on 11/2/2015. (cdnS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/2/2015)
1
2
3
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
4
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
5
6
STEVE THIEME,
Case No. 13-cv-03827-MEJ
Plaintiff,
7
ORDER VACATING CASE
MANAGEMENT DEADLINES AND
SETTING CMC
v.
8
9
DIANE M. COBB, et al.,
Defendants.
10
11
CYNTHIA CHENAULT,
Case No. 13-cv-03828-MEJ
United States District Court
Northern District of California
Plaintiff,
12
v.
13
14
DIANE M. COBB, et al.,
Defendants.
15
16
LEWIS HAYNES,
Case No. 15-cv-02455-MEJ
Plaintiff,
17
v.
18
19
20
DIANE E. COBB, et al.,
Defendants.
21
22
These three related cases are currently scheduled for an order to show cause hearing on
23
December 3, 2015 regarding Plaintiffs’ failure to serve certain named Defendants. At the same
24
time, there are upcoming pretrial deadlines, including the deadline to file dispositive motions. As
25
these cases are assigned to a magistrate judge, it is not clear how the cases should proceed, given
26
the lack of consent from the Defendants that have not been served. Accordingly, the Court sets
27
these three cases for a Case Management Conference on December 3, 2015 at 10:00 a.m. in
28
Courtroom B. The parties shall file a joint case management statement by November 19, 2015.
1
The parties may file one statement for all three cases, or they may choose to file separate
2
statements for each case. The upcoming dispositive motion deadline and hearing are VACATED.
3
All subsequent pretrial deadlines, including trial dates, are also VACATED.
4
IT IS SO ORDERED.
5
6
7
8
Dated: November 2, 2015
______________________________________
MARIA-ELENA JAMES
United States Magistrate Judge
9
10
United States District Court
Northern District of California
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?