Thieme v. Cobb et al

Filing 114

ORDER VACATING PRETRIAL DEADLINES. Case Management Statement due by 11/19/2015. Case Management Conference set for 12/3/2015 10:00 AM. Signed by Judge Maria-Elena James on 11/2/2015. (cdnS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/2/2015)

Download PDF
1 2 3 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 4 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 5 6 STEVE THIEME, Case No. 13-cv-03827-MEJ Plaintiff, 7 ORDER VACATING CASE MANAGEMENT DEADLINES AND SETTING CMC v. 8 9 DIANE M. COBB, et al., Defendants. 10 11 CYNTHIA CHENAULT, Case No. 13-cv-03828-MEJ United States District Court Northern District of California Plaintiff, 12 v. 13 14 DIANE M. COBB, et al., Defendants. 15 16 LEWIS HAYNES, Case No. 15-cv-02455-MEJ Plaintiff, 17 v. 18 19 20 DIANE E. COBB, et al., Defendants. 21 22 These three related cases are currently scheduled for an order to show cause hearing on 23 December 3, 2015 regarding Plaintiffs’ failure to serve certain named Defendants. At the same 24 time, there are upcoming pretrial deadlines, including the deadline to file dispositive motions. As 25 these cases are assigned to a magistrate judge, it is not clear how the cases should proceed, given 26 the lack of consent from the Defendants that have not been served. Accordingly, the Court sets 27 these three cases for a Case Management Conference on December 3, 2015 at 10:00 a.m. in 28 Courtroom B. The parties shall file a joint case management statement by November 19, 2015. 1 The parties may file one statement for all three cases, or they may choose to file separate 2 statements for each case. The upcoming dispositive motion deadline and hearing are VACATED. 3 All subsequent pretrial deadlines, including trial dates, are also VACATED. 4 IT IS SO ORDERED. 5 6 7 8 Dated: November 2, 2015 ______________________________________ MARIA-ELENA JAMES United States Magistrate Judge 9 10 United States District Court Northern District of California 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?