Roe v. American Databank, LLC
Filing
30
ORDER GRANTING STIPULATION FOR FILING OF FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT. Signed by Judge Alsup on February 3, 2014. (whalc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/3/2014)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
Michael A. Caddell (SBN 249469)
mac~caddellchapman.com
C~ ia B. Chapman ~SBN 164471~
Craig C. Marchtando SBN 283829
CADDELL & CHAPMAN
1331 Lamar, Suite 1070
Houston TX 77010
Telephone: ~713) 751-0400
Facsrmile: ( 13) 751-0906
Devin H. Fok (SBN 256599)
THE LAW OFFICES OF DEVIN H. FOK
P.O. Box 7165
Alhambra CA 91802-7165
Telephone: ~310) 430-9933
Facsrmile: ( 23~563-3445
devin@devmfo aw.com
12
Joshua E. Kim (SBN 257260)
A NEW WAY OF LIFE REENTRY PROJECT
P.O. Box 875288
Los Angeles CA 90087
Telephone: ~323) 563-3575
Facsrmile: ( 23) 563-3445
13
Attorneys for Plaintiff
10
11
14
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
15
16
17
ASTRAILIA I. DUNFORD,
Plaintiff,
18
19
No. 3:13-cv-03829-WHA
[PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING
STIPULATfON FOR FILING OF
FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT
vs.
20
21
22
AMERICAN DATABANK, LLC,
Defendant.
Date of filing:
Date of removal:
June 7, 2013
Aug. 16,2013
23
Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 15(a)(2) and the Court's order
24
granting her Motion to Intervene (Dkt. 26), the Parties have stipulated that Astrailia
25
Dunford file the First Amended Complaint attached as Exhibit 1 to the Stipulation.
26
27
28
1
1 Having considered the Motion, Defendant's Response, the record in this case, and the
2
applicable law, the Court is of the opinion that the Stipulation should be GRANTED.
3
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED
attached as Exhibit 1 to the Parties' Stipulation.
Wllham Alsup ORDERED
O
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
IT IS S
February 3, 2014.
8
9
RT
11
Judge W
ER
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
A
H
12
lsup
illiam A
NO
10
R NIA
Date:
UNIT
ED
7
RT
U
O
S
6
S DISTRICT
TE
C
TA
FO
5
That Astrailia Dunford will immediately file the First Amended Complaint
LI
4
N
F
D IS T IC T O
R
C
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?