Watershed Asset Management, L.L.C. v. Watershed Capital, LLC

Filing 25

ORDER DENYING PRO HAC VICE APPLICATION OF ATTORNEY MICHELLE MANCINO MARSH by Hon. William Alsup denying 21 Motion for Pro Hac Vice.(whalc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 12/10/2013)

1
2
3
4
5

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

6
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
7
8
9

12
13
14

No. C 13-03852 WHA

Plaintiff,

11
For the Northern District of California

United States District Court

10

WATERSHED ASSET MANAGEMENT,
L.L.C.,

ORDER DENYING PRO HAC
VICE APPLICATION OF
ATTORNEY MICHELLE
MANCINO MARSH

v.
WATERSHED CAPITAL, LLC,
Defendant.
/

15
16

The pro hac vice application of Attorney Michelle Mancino Marsh (Dkt. No. 21) is

17

DENIED for failing to comply with Local Rule 11-3. The local rule requires that an applicant

18

certify that “he or she is an active member in good standing of the bar of a United States Court

19

or of the highest court of another State or the District of Columbia, specifying such bar”

20

(emphasis added). Filling out the pro hac vice form from the district court website such that it

21

only identifies the state of bar membership — such as “New York” — is inadequate under the

22

local rule because it fails to identify a specific court (such as the Supreme Court of the State of

23

New York). While the application fee does not need to be paid again, the application cannot be

24

processed until a corrected form is submitted.

25
26

IT IS SO ORDERED.

27
28

Dated: December 10, 2013.

WILLIAM ALSUP
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE