Watershed Asset Management, L.L.C. v. Watershed Capital, LLC

Filing 25

ORDER DENYING PRO HAC VICE APPLICATION OF ATTORNEY MICHELLE MANCINO MARSH by Hon. William Alsup denying 21 Motion for Pro Hac Vice.(whalc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 12/10/2013)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 6 FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 7 8 9 12 13 14 No. C 13-03852 WHA Plaintiff, 11 For the Northern District of California United States District Court 10 WATERSHED ASSET MANAGEMENT, L.L.C., ORDER DENYING PRO HAC VICE APPLICATION OF ATTORNEY MICHELLE MANCINO MARSH v. WATERSHED CAPITAL, LLC, Defendant. / 15 16 The pro hac vice application of Attorney Michelle Mancino Marsh (Dkt. No. 21) is 17 DENIED for failing to comply with Local Rule 11-3. The local rule requires that an applicant 18 certify that “he or she is an active member in good standing of the bar of a United States Court 19 or of the highest court of another State or the District of Columbia, specifying such bar” 20 (emphasis added). Filling out the pro hac vice form from the district court website such that it 21 only identifies the state of bar membership — such as “New York” — is inadequate under the 22 local rule because it fails to identify a specific court (such as the Supreme Court of the State of 23 New York). While the application fee does not need to be paid again, the application cannot be 24 processed until a corrected form is submitted. 25 26 IT IS SO ORDERED. 27 28 Dated: December 10, 2013. WILLIAM ALSUP UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?