Camaj et al v. Nippon Yusen Kabushiki Kaisha, Ltd. et al

Filing 17

SUPPLEMENTAL ORDER TO ORDER SETTING INITIAL CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE re 16 Clerks Notice. Signed by Judge William Alsup on 10/16/12. (dt, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/18/2013)

1

Last Revised October 16, 2012.

2
3
4
5
6

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

7
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
8
9
United States District Court
For the Northern District of California

10
11
12

SUPPLEMENTAL ORDER TO
ORDER SETTING INITIAL CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE
IN CIVIL CASES BEFORE JUDGE WILLIAM ALSUP

13
14
INTRODUCTION

15
16
17
18

The purpose of this supplemental order is to guide the parties on recurring practical
questions that arise prior to trial and to impose certain requirements for the conduct of the
case. Counsel must please read this order and follow it.
SERVICE OF THIS ORDER

19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28

1.

For cases originating in this Court, plaintiff(s) must serve this order and the order

setting the initial case management conference (along with any other required pleadings) on each
defendant. For cases removed from state court, the removing defendant(s) must serve this order
and the order setting the initial case management conference (along with any other required
pleadings) immediately on each and every party that has previously appeared or that appears
within thirty days after removal. Thereafter, any existing party to the action that brings a new
party into the action must immediately serve a copy of this order and the order setting the initial
case management conference (along with any other required pleadings) on the new party.

1
2

CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE
2.

The parties will please address the standardized items in the court-wide format

3

for the joint case management statement. This is available at the Standing Order For all Judges

4

of the Northern District of California — Contents of Joint Case Management Statements.

5

Please file (electronically or manually depending on your case) at least SEVEN CALENDAR DAYS

6

prior to the case management conference.

7

3.

Each party shall be represented at the case management conference by counsel

8

prepared to address all such matters and with authority to enter stipulations and to make

9

admissions.

United States District Court
For the Northern District of California

10

4.

Pursuant to FRCP 26(d), no formal discovery shall be initiated by any party until

11

after the meet-and-confer session required by FRCP 26(f), except by stipulation or prior court

12

order. As soon as a party has notice of this order, however, the party shall take such affirmative

13

steps as are necessary to preserve evidence related to the issues presented by the action,

14

including, without limitation, interdiction of any document-destruction programs and any

15

ongoing erasures of e-mails, voice mails, and other electronically-recorded material.

16
17

ELECTRONIC CASE FILING — LODGING HARD COPIES WITH CHAMBERS
5.

In all “E-Filing” cases, in addition to filing papers electronically, the parties are

18

required to lodge for chambers one paper copy of each document that is filed electronically.

19

These printed copies shall be marked “Chambers Copy — Do Not File” and shall be in an

20

envelop clearly marked with the judge’s name and case number. It shall be delivered in

21

accordance with Civil Local Rule 5-1(e)(7). For the final pretrial conference, please follow

22

Guidelines for Trial and Final Pretrial Conference In Civil Jury Cases Before the Honorable

23

William Alsup.
SETTING MOTIONS FOR HEARING

24
25

6.

Counsel need not request a motion hearing date and may notice non-discovery

26

motions for any Thursday (excepting holidays) at 8:00 a.m. The Court sometimes rules on the

27

papers, issuing a written order and vacating the hearing. If a written request for oral argument is

28

filed before a ruling, stating that a lawyer of four or fewer years out of law school will conduct
2

1

the oral argument or at least the lion’s share, then the Court will hear oral argument, believing

2

that young lawyers need more opportunities for appearances than they usually receive.
FORM OF SUBMISSIONS

3
4

7.

On summary judgment motions, joint statements of undisputed facts are not

5

required but are helpful if completely agreed upon. Please do not file separate statements of

6

“undisputed facts.”

7

8.

Reply declarations are disfavored. Opening declarations should set forth all facts

8

on points foreseeably relevant to the relief sought. Reply papers should not raise new points that

9

could have been addressed in the opening.

United States District Court
For the Northern District of California

10
11
12

9.

The title of the submission must be sufficient to alert the Court to the relief

sought; for example, please do not bury a request for continuance in the body of a memorandum.
10.

All submissions filed with the Court shall include on the cover sheet the date and

13

time of the hearing or conference. Counsel should include their facsimile transmission numbers

14

along with their telephone numbers on their papers.

15
16

DISCOVERY
11.

The following paragraphs on discovery provide counsel and the parties with

17

views and guidelines of Judge Alsup so that they can plan accordingly. For good cause, the

18

parties are invited to propose any modifications in their joint case management conference

19

statement. Unless and until modified, however, the following provisions shall supplement the

20

requirements of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and the local rules.

21

12.

In responding to requests for documents and materials under FRCP 34, all parties

22

shall affirmatively state in a written response the full extent to which they will produce materials

23

and shall, promptly after the production, confirm in writing that they have produced all such

24

materials so described that are locatable after a diligent search of all locations at which such

25

materials might plausibly exist. It is not sufficient to state that “responsive” materials will be or

26

have been produced. Such a response leaves open the distinct possibility that other responsive

27

materials have not been produced.

28
3

1

13.

In searching for responsive materials in connection with FRCP 34 requests or for

2

materials required to be disclosed under FRCP 26(a)(1), parties must search computerized files,

3

e-mails, voice mails, work files, desk files, calendars and diaries, and any other locations and

4

sources if materials of the type to be produced might plausibly be expected to be found there.

5

The Court has found that certain basic information normally learned by counsel anyway should

6

be made available to the other side at the time of production, as if it were a response to a

7

standing interrogatory, as follows. At the time of the production, the responding party should

8

provide a written list to the requesting party setting forth in detail each specific source and

9

location searched. The list must also identify, by name and position, all persons conducting the

United States District Court
For the Northern District of California

10

search and their areas of search responsibility. The producing party shall also provide a list

11

describing the specific source for each produced item as well as for each item withheld on a

12

ground of privilege, using the unique identifying numbers to specify documents or ranges.

13

Materials produced in discovery should bear unique identifying control numbers on each page.

14

14.

To the maximum extent feasible, all party files and records should be retained

15

and produced in their original form and sequence including file folders, and the originals should

16

remain available for inspection by any counsel on reasonable notice.

17

15.

Except for good cause, no item shall be received as case-in-chief evidence if the

18

proponent has failed to produce it in response to a reasonable and proper discovery request

19

covering the item, regardless of whether any discovery motion was made. A burden or

20

overbreadth or similar objection shall not be a valid reason for withholding requested materials

21

actually known to counsel or a party representative responsible for the conduct of the litigation.

22

16.

Privilege logs shall be promptly provided and must be sufficiently detailed and

23

informative to justify the privilege. See FRCP 26(b)(5). No generalized claims of privilege or

24

work-product protection shall be permitted. With respect to each communication for which a

25

claim of privilege or work product is made, the asserting party must at the time of assertion

26

identify:

27
28

(a)

all persons making or receiving the privileged or protected

communication;
4

1

(b)

the steps taken to ensure the confidentiality of the communication,

2

including affirmation that no unauthorized persons have received the

3

communication;

4

(c)

the date of the communication; and

5

(d)

the subject matter of the communication.

6

Failure to furnish this information at the time of the assertion will be deemed a waiver of the

7

privilege or protection. The log should also indicate, as stated above, the location where the

8

document was found.

9

17.

Absent extraordinary circumstances, counsel shall consult in advance with

United States District Court
For the Northern District of California

10

opposing counsel and unrepresented proposed deponents to schedule depositions at

11

mutually-convenient times and places. That some counsel may be unavailable shall not,

12

however, be grounds for deferring or postponing a deposition if another attorney from the

13

same firm or who represents a party with similar interests to that witness is able to attend.

14

Ordinarily, if one side desires a prompt deposition, the other side is expected to agree to dates

15

falling within thirty days of the request. On the other hand, rarely should one side expect the

16

other side to agree to a deposition sooner than seven days of the request.

17

18.

If any objection to a request for materials is overruled, and if the disputed request

18

was due and pending at the time of a deposition, the withholding party or counsel must, at the

19

request of any other party, re-produce all deponents under its control or represented by them for

20

further deposition examination as to any new materials produced in response that are germane

21

to that deponent and must bear the expense of doing so. A party objecting to producing

22

requested materials may not use the existence of its own objections as a basis for postponing

23

any deposition unless such party promptly meets and confers and then, if failing to reach an

24

agreement, seeks to bring a prompt motion for a protective order.

25

19.

Counsel and parties shall comply with FRCP 30(d)(1). Deposition objections

26

must be as to privilege or form only. Speaking objections are prohibited. Under no

27

circumstances should any counsel interject, “if you know,” or otherwise coach a deponent.

28

When a privilege is claimed, the witness should nevertheless answer questions relevant to the
5

1

existence, extent or waiver of the privilege, such as the date of a communication, who made the

2

statement, to whom and in whose presence the statement was made, other persons to whom the

3

contents of the statement have been disclosed, and the general subject matter of the statement.

4

Private conferences between deponents and attorneys in the course of examination, including a

5

line of related questions, are improper and prohibited except for the sole purpose of determining

6

whether a privilege should be asserted.

7

20.

Deponents and their counsel must make a good-faith effort to prepare for

depositions and to refresh witness memories on important matters in the suit about which the

9

witness reasonably should be expected to have knowledge. Deponents who claim to lack

10
United States District Court
For the Northern District of California

8

recollection during their deposition but who later claim at trial to have had their memories

11

refreshed in the interim, may be, among other things, impeached with their previous failures of

12

recollection during their depositions or be subject to preclusion. In preparing deponents,

13

defending counsel shall segregate and retain all materials used to refresh their memories and

14

shall provide them to examining counsel at the outset of the deposition.

15

21.

To the maximum extent feasible, deposition exhibits shall be numbered in a

16

simple manner that will allow the same numbering at trial. In discovery, counsel shall agree on

17

blocks of exhibit numbers to be used by the respective parties. Identical exhibits should not be

18

re-marked, but various versions of the same document, such as copies with hand notes added,

19

should be separately marked if used. See Local Rule 30-2(b)(3).

20

22.

FRCP 26(a)(2)(B) requires disclosure of all opinions, bases, reasons and other

21

information considered by an expert. Counsel shall preserve all drafts of expert reports

22

(partial or complete) and notes and other evidence of communications with experts (or with

23

any intermediaries between counsel and the experts) on the subject of this actual or potential

24

testimony, and shall instruct their experts and any intermediaries to do likewise. These

25

materials, however, need not be produced absent the showing required by FRCP 26(b)(3)

26

and (4).

27
28

23.

With respect to depositions under FRCP 30(b)(6), the fundamental purpose is to

allow a party to notice a deposition by subject matter, thereby requiring the respondent to
6

1

designate and to produce one or more organization witnesses knowledgeable on the designated

2

topic, a useful procedure when the roles of percipient witnesses controlled by an adverse party

3

are unknown. In some cases, however, counsel routinely appear to notice

4

Rule 30(b)(6) depositions on numerous and wide-ranging topics, including even the basis for

5

“contentions” made by adverse parties. To obviate disputes and to give guidance, these

6

guidelines will be observed:

7

(a)

Without a prior order increasing the limit, a party may seek

Rule 30(b)(6) depositions from another party on up to a total of ten subject

9

matters (for the entire case) described with “reasonable particularity.” In framing

10
United States District Court
For the Northern District of California

8

the subjects, it is normally improper to ask for Rule 30(b)(6) deponents to testify

11

concerning the entire basis of a claim or defense. On the other hand, examples of

12

proper subjects, which would require the respondent to find and to produce

13

knowledgeable deponents, include “the time line of research and development

14

leading to the invention in question” or “the efforts undertaken by defendant to

15

locate documents responsive to plaintiff’s document request.” The notice should

16

be directed at discovering percipient facts in the possession of the adverse party,

17

not at forcing a supposed “fact witness” to appear and defend the entire thesis of a

18

claim or defense. If a notice includes an overbroad topic, the overbroad topic

19

shall be unenforceable and may not be later replaced with a proper topic.

20

(b)

Each witness-designee deposed for one half-day or more in a

21

Rule 30(b)(6) deposition shall count as a single deposition for purposes of the

22

deposition limit under FRCP 26 or under any case management order setting a

23

limit on the number of depositions. A corporate designee may, immediately after

24

being deposed on the stated subject, be deposed in his or her individual capacity.

25

Both such sessions shall count together as a single deposition (although they

26

should be separately transcribed). If two designees, to take another example, are

27

interrogated, each for one half-day or more, then they count as two depositions.

28
7

1

(c)

If an organization cannot reasonably locate a witness to testify

2

based on personal knowledge, there is no requirement under Rule 30(b)(6) for the

3

organization to “woodshed” or to “educate” an individual to testify on the subject.

4

If the organization does not produce any such deponent, however, the

5

organization may not present case-in-chief evidence at trial or on summary

6

judgment on that topic from any witness it could have so designated.

7

(d)

Rule 30(b)(6) testimony never constitutes an irrebuttable judicial

8

admission. It will normally, however, be evidence admissible against the

9

organization producing the witness. The jury may, upon request, be instructed on

United States District Court
For the Northern District of California

10

the significance of the testimony under Rule 30(b)(6).

11

24.

If a dispute arises during a deposition and involves either a persistent obstruction

12

of the deposition or a refusal to answer a material question on a ground other than privilege,

13

counsel may attempt to arrange a telephone conference with the Court through the courtroom

14

deputy, Dawn Toland, at 415-522-2020. Any such conference should be attended by the same

15

court reporter recording the deposition.

16

25.

All other requests for discovery relief must first be summarized in a letter no

17

longer than three pages from the party seeking relief after having met and conferred. Up to

18

twelve pages of attachments may be added. In the letter, counsel should identify themselves in

19

the signature block as “counsel for ___________.” The letter should be electronically-filed in

20

the official file along with the discovery-dispute requests and responses, as well as any timely

21

letter cancelling the hearing if settlement is reached. (Please note that with all communications

22

with the Court by e-filing, a hard copy must be lodged in the Court’s mail box in the Clerk’s

23

Office on the sixteenth floor in the time frame requested by local rule.) The Court will then

24

advise the parties whether a response, written motion or a telephone conference or court hearing

25

will be required. After the telephone conference or hearing, counsel should submit their

26

proposed order (agreed as to form) by e-filing it. This paragraph applies only to cases wherein

27

discovery is being supervised by the district judge rather than by a magistrate judge or special

28

master.
8

1
2

DISCLOSURES
26.

Apart from discovery, Rule 26 requires certain automatic disclosures and requires

3

them to be made in a timely manner. Under Rule 37(c), untimely-disclosed materials may not be

4

used at trial or on summary judgment unless the delay in disclosure is “harmless” or unless

5

“substantial justification” for the delay is shown.

6
7

COMMUNICATIONS WITH CHAMBERS
27.

Please do not send any letters to the Court (except for requests for discovery

8

conferences, short cover letters for dismissals, orders agreed-upon as to form, or chambers

9

copies of electronically-filed documents). When corresponding with the Court by letter, always

United States District Court
For the Northern District of California

10

identify whom you represent. Please do not fax or messenger anything to chambers without

11

advance permission specific to the item. Please e-file all submissions to the Court and make sure

12

a hard copy is lodged in the Court’s mail box in the Clerk’s Office on the sixteenth floor within

13

the time frame requested by local rule.

14

28.

You may contact the courtroom deputy, Dawn Toland (on the sixteenth floor in

15

the Clerk’s Office), at 415-522-2020 with appropriate inquiries. Except for the letters described

16

above, please do not attempt to make contact by telephone or any other ex parte means with

17

chambers staff.

18
19

CROSS REFERENCE TO OTHER STANDING ORDERS AND GUIDELINES
29.

The Court has separate standing guidelines for preparation for the final pretrial

20

conference and trial. In securities cases, the Court has a standing order concerning early notice

21

to class members. They are always available for review at the website for the United States

22

District Court for the Northern District of California at www.cand.uscourts.gov.

23
24
25

Dated: October 16, 2012.

WILLIAM ALSUP

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

26
27
28
9