Saraceni v. Miller et al
Filing
36
STIPULATION AND ORDER Continuing Case Management Conference and Setting Briefing Schedule. Case Management Statement due by 4/11/2014. Case Management Conference set for 4/18/2014 10:00 AM in Courtroom 1, 17th Floor, San Francisco. Signed by Judge Samuel Conti on 12/10/2013. (tmi, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 12/10/2013)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
KEITH E. EGGLETON, State Bar No. 159842
Email: keggleton@wsgr.com
KELLEY M. KINNEY, State Bar No. 216823
Email: kkinney@wsgr.com
CRYSTAL M. GAUDETTE, State Bar No. 247712
Email: cgaudette@wsgr.com
WILSON SONSINI GOODRICH & ROSATI
Professional Corporation
650 Page Mill Road
Palo Alto, CA 94304-1050
Telephone: (650) 493-9300
Facsimile: (650) 565-5100
Attorneys for Defendants
Betsy S. Atkins, John A. Kelley, D. Scott Mercer,
William A. Owens, Kevin T. Parker
and Nominal Defendant Polycom, Inc.
10
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
11
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
12
SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION
13
14
15
16
17
IN RE POLYCOM, INC. DERIVATIVE
LITIGATION,
This Document Relates To:
ALL ACTIONS
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER RE:
BRIEFING SCHEDULE & CONTINUING CMC
LEAD CASE NO.: 3:13-CV-3880-SC
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
Lead Case No.: 3:13-cv-3880-SC
(Derivative Action)
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED]
ORDER REGARDING BRIEFING
SCHEDULE FOR DEFENDANTS’
RESPONSE TO COMPLAINT, AND
CONTINUING CASE
MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE
1
2
3
Pursuant to Civil Local Rules 6-2 and 7-12, the parties submit the following Stipulation
and [Proposed] Order through their respective counsel of record.
WHEREAS, plaintiff Ralph Saraceni filed a shareholder derivative complaint against
4
defendants Andrew M. Miller, Betsy S. Atkins, John A. Kelley, D. Scott Mercer,
5
William A. Owens, and Kevin T. Parker, as well as nominal defendant Polycom, Inc.
6
(collectively, “Defendants”) for violation of various state laws on August 21, 2013 (“Saraceni
7
Derivative Action”) (Case No. 3:13-cv-03880-SC, ECF No. 1);
8
9
10
11
WHEREAS, plaintiff James Donnelly filed a shareholder derivative complaint against
Defendants for violation of various state laws on October 16, 2013 (“Donnelly Derivative
Action”) (Case No. 3:13-cv-04810-SC, ECF No. 1);
WHEREAS, on October 31, 2013, the Court entered an order (the “Consolidation Order”)
12
which: (1) consolidated the Saraceni Derivative Action and the Donnelly Derivative Action into
13
the above-captioned action (the “Consolidated Derivative Action”); (2) required plaintiffs
14
Saraceni and Donnelly (together, “Plaintiffs”) to file or designate an operative complaint in the
15
Consolidated Derivative Action within 30 days of the Consolidation Order; and (3) within 10
16
days of such filing or designation of an operative complaint, required the parties to meet and
17
confer regarding and file a mutually agreeable schedule and dates by which Defendants must
18
answer, move to dismiss, or otherwise respond to the operative complaint and file a stipulated
19
briefing schedule with the Court for approval (ECF No. 27);
20
21
22
WHEREAS, Plaintiffs filed a notice designating an operative complaint in the
Consolidated Derivative Action on November 27, 2013 (ECF No. 28);
WHEREAS, the parties have met and conferred, and have agreed to the following
23
briefing schedule in connection with the Defendants’ response to the operative complaint in the
24
Consolidated Derivative Action:
25
26
27
28
(1) Defendants shall move to dismiss the operative complaint in the Consolidated
Derivative Action no later than February 7, 2014;
(2) Plaintiffs shall file their opposition to Defendants’ motion(s) to dismiss no later than
March 14, 2014;
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER RE:
BRIEFING SCHEDULE & CONTINUING CMC
LEAD CASE NO.: 3:13-CV-3880-SC
-1-
1
2
(3) Defendants shall file their reply brief(s) in support of their motion(s) to dismiss no
later than March 28, 2014; and
3
4
(4) The hearing date for Defendants’ motion(s) to dismiss will be set for April 18, 2014 at
10:00 a.m., or the soonest date thereafter on which the Court is available to hear the motion(s);
5
6
WHEREAS, the Consolidation Order also set an Initial Case Management Conference in
the Consolidated Derivative Action for December 20, 2013 at 10:00 a.m. (ECF No. 27); and
7
WHEREAS, subject to the Court’s approval, the parties agree that the Initial Case
8
Management Conference should be continued until after Defendants respond to the operative
9
complaint.
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
//
//
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER RE:
BRIEFING SCHEDULE & CONTINUING CMC
LEAD CASE NO.: 3:13-CV-3880-SC
-2-
1
2
NOW, THEREFORE, subject to the Court’s approval, the parties hereby stipulate and
agree as follows:
3
4
(1) Defendants shall move to dismiss the operative complaint in the Consolidated
Derivative Action no later than February 7, 2014;
5
6
(2) Plaintiffs shall file their opposition to Defendants’ motion(s) to dismiss no later than
March 14, 2014;
7
8
(3) Defendants shall file their reply brief(s) in support of their motion(s) to dismiss no
later than March 28, 2014;
9
(4) The hearing date for Defendants’ motion(s) to dismiss will be set for April 18, 2014 at
10
10:00 a.m., or the soonest date thereafter on which the Court is available to hear the motion(s);
11
and
12
(5) The Initial Case Management Conference in the Consolidated Derivative Action
13
currently scheduled for December 20, 2013 at 10:00 a.m. is hereby vacated, and the Initial Case
14
Management in the Consolidated Derivative Action shall instead be set for April 18, 2014 at
15
10:00 a.m., or to such other date and time as this Court may order.
16
17
IT IS SO STIPULATED.
Dated: December 9, 2013
18
Respectfully submitted,
WILSON SONSINI GOODRICH & ROSATI
Professional Corporation
650 Page Mill Road
Palo Alto, CA 94304-1050
Telephone: (650) 493-9300
Facsimile: (650) 565-5100
19
20
21
22
By: /s/ Keith E. Eggleton
Keith E. Eggleton
keggleton@wsgr.com
23
24
Attorneys for Defendants Betsy S. Atkins, John A.
Kelley, D. Scott Mercer, William A. Owens, Kevin
T. Parker, and Nominal Defendant Polycom, Inc.
25
26
27
28
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER RE:
BRIEFING SCHEDULE & CONTINUING CMC
LEAD CASE NO.: 3:13-CV-3880-SC
-3-
1
Dated: December 9, 2013
By:
2
3
/s/ Paul T. Friedman
Paul T. Friedman
pfriedman@mofo.com
6
MORRISON FOERSTER
PAUL T. FRIEDMAN
PHILIP T. BESIROF
425 Market Street
San Francisco, CA 94105-2482
Telephone: (415) 268-7000
Facsimile: (415) 268-7522
7
Attorneys for Defendant Andrew M. Miller
4
5
8
9
Dated: December 9, 2013
10
11
JOHNSON & WEAVER, LLP
FRANK J. JOHNSON
SHAWN E. FIELDS
NATHAN R. HAMLER
110 West A Street, Suite 750
San Diego, CA 92101
Telephone: (619) 230-0063
Facsimile: (619) 255-1856
12
13
14
15
Attorneys for Plaintiffs
16
17
18
19
By: /s/ Nathan R. Hamler
Nathan R. Hamler
nathanh@johnsonandweaver.com
I, Keith E. Eggleton, am the ECF user whose ID and password are being used to file this
Stipulation and [Proposed] Regarding Briefing Schedule for Defendants’ Response to
Complaint, and Continuing Case Management Conference. In compliance with Civil Local
Rule 5-1(i)(3), I hereby attest that Paul T. Friedman, and Nathan R. Hamler have concurred in
this filing.
20
[PROPOSED] ORDER
21
PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED.
23
UNIT
ED
S
10
Dated: December ___, 2013
RT
U
O
NO
26
RT
27
onti
amuel C
Judge S
H
ER
28
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER RE:
BRIEFING SCHEDULE & CONTINUING CMC
LEAD CASE NO.: 3:13-CV-3880-SC
-4-
FO
25
R NIA
THE HONORABLE SAMUEL CONTI
United States District Judge
LI
24
S DISTRICT
TE
C
TA
A
22
N
F
D IS T IC T O
R
C
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?