Carper et al v. Adknowledge, Inc. et al

Filing 28

ORDER CONTINUING HEARING DATE FOR DEFENDANTS MOTION TO DISQUALIFY COUNSEL re 22 MOTION to Disqualify Counsel filed by Adknowledge, Inc. Motion Hearing set for 11/7/2013 at 2:00 PM in Courtroom 9, 19th Floor, San Francisco before Hon. Jon S. Tigar. Signed by Judge Jon S. Tigar on September 23, 2013. (wsn, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/23/2013)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14

Daniel L. Balsam (State Bar No. 260423)
THE LAW OFFICES OF DANIEL BALSAM
2912 Diamond Street #218
San Francisco, CA 94131
Phone: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
Timothy J. Walton (State Bar No. 184292)
WALTON TWU LLP
9515 Soquel Drive, Suite 207
Aptos, CA 95003-4137
Phone [phone]
Fax: [phone]
Jeffrey A. Pollak (State Bar No. 239575)
MANN ORLANSKY & POLLAK
1901 1st Avenue, Suite 405
San Diego, CA 92101
Phone [phone]
Fax: [phone]
Attorneys for Plaintiffs SHELLY CARPER, STEVE CARPER, NICK OLIVERES, MARIO
OSOTEO, and DEBRA RUIZ

15
16

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

17

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA (SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION)

18

SHELLY CARPER et al,

19

Plaintiffs,

20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27

vs.
ADKNOWLEDGE INC. et al,
Defendants.

)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)

Case No.

3:13-cv-03921 (JST)

STIPULATION AND ORDER
CONTINUING HEARING DATE FOR
DEFENDANT’S MOTION TO
DISQUALIFY COUNSEL
Judge:

Hon. Jon S. Tigar

Counsel for Plaintiffs (and the subject of the Motion to Disqualify Counsel) has a
personal conflict with the October 31, 2013 at 2:00 pm hearing noticed for this Motion. The
Parties and their attorneys agree that the Court may enter an Order continuing the hearing date by

28
1
STIPULATION AND ORDER CONTINUING HEARING DATE
FOR DEFENDANT’S MOTION TO DISQUALIFY COUNSEL

1

one week, to November 7 at 2:00 pm. The briefing schedule shall remain the same: Plaintiffs’

2

Opposition is due by October 2, and Defendants’ Reply is due by October 9.

3
4
5

THE LAW OFFICES OF DANIEL BALSAM
Dated: September 22, 2013

6

/s/ Daniel L. Balsam
Daniel L. Balsam
Attorney for Plaintiffs Shelly Carper et al

7
NEWMAN DU WORS LLP

8
9

Dated: September 23, 2013

10

/s/ Derek A. Newman
Derek A. Newman
Attorney for Defendant Adknowledge Inc.

11
12

21
22

25

ER

H

24

n S.
J u d ge J o

United States District Court Judge

RT

23

Dated: September 23, 2013

VED
APPRO

RT
U
O

20

IT IS SO ORDERED.

NO

19

S DISTRICT
TE
C
TA

R NIA

18

Opposition is due by October 2, and Defendants’ Reply is due by October 9.

Ti ga r

FO

17

November 7, 2013 at 2:00 pm. The briefing schedule shall remain the same: Plaintiffs’

LI

16

Disqualify Counsel previously scheduled for October 31, 2013 at 2:00 pm is continued to

A

15

Pursuant to the above stipulation of the Parties, the hearing on Defendants’ Motion to

S

14

ORDER

UNIT
ED

13

N

F
D IS T IC T O
R

C

26
27
28
2
STIPULATION AND ORDER CONTINUING HEARING DATE
FOR DEFENDANT’S MOTION TO DISQUALIFY COUNSEL