Ciociolo v. Nationstar Mortgage LLC et al
Filing
26
ORDER re 25 Notice of Voluntary Dismissal filed by Dori Ciociolo. Signed by Magistrate Judge Maria-Elena James on 4/21/2014. (rmm2S, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/21/2014)
R NIA
s
LI
ER
na Jame
aria-Ele
FO
S
Judge M
H
6
RT
5
NO
4
Dated: 4/21/2014
A
3
TED
GRAN
RT
U
O
2
Erikson M. Davis (SBN 197841)
Tala Rezai (SBN 271949)
REAL ESTATE LAW CENTER, PC
695 South Vermont Avenue, Suite 1100
Los Angeles, California 90005
(213) 201-6353 Phone
(213) 281-9627 Facsimile
tala@lenderlawlitigation.com
ISTRIC
ES D
TC
AT
T
UNIT
ED
1
N
F
D IS T IC T O
R
C
7
8
ATTORNEYS FOR PLAINTIFF
DORI CIOCIOLO
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA –
SAN FRANCISCO COURTHOUSE
DORI CIOCIOLO, an individual,
)
)
Plaintiff,
)
v.
)
)
BARCLAYS BANK, PLC, a subsidiary )
of BARCLAYS PLC, as successor in )
interest to LEHMAN BROTHERS
)
BANK, FSB, a national banking
)
institution; AURORA LAON
)
SERVICES LLC, a business entity;
)
NATIONSTAR MORTGAGE LLC, a )
business entity; OLD REPUBLIC
)
DEFAULT MANAGEMENT
)
SERVICES, a business entity;
)
MORTGAGE ELECTRONIC
)
REGISTRATION SYSTEMS, INC., a )
business entity; and DOES 1 through 10 )
inclusive,
)
)
Defendants.
)
)
Case No: 3:13-cv-03929-MEJ
NOTICE OF DISMISSAL
WITHOUT PREJUDICE
PURSUANT TO FEDERAL RULES
OF CIVIL PROCEDURE 41(a)
Hon.: Maria-Elena James
Courtroom B – 15th Floor
1
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
1
2
Pursuant to Rule 41(a) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, Plaintiff
Dori Ciociolo, by and through her attorneys, hereby voluntarily dismiss the above-
3
4
5
entitled matter, without prejudice, against all Defendants, each party to bear its
own fees and costs.
6
7
8
Respectfully submitted,
9
10
11
Dated: April 17, 2014
REAL ESTATE LAW CENTER, PC
12
13
14
15
16
__/s/ Erikson M. Davis_____________
ERIKSON M. DAVIS
Attorney for Plaintiff DORI CIOCIOLO
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?