Perlongo v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.

Filing 8

JOINT STIPULATION AND ORDER TRANSFERRING ACTION TO THE DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY. Signed by Judge Nathanael Cousins on 9/20/13. (lmh, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/20/2013)

Case3:13-cv-03961-NC Document7 Filed09/20/13 Page1 of 5

1
2
3
4
5
6
7

C. Brandon Wisoff (State Bar No. 121930)
[e-mail]
Thomas B. Mayhew (State Bar No. 183539)
[e-mail]
Alexander M. Porcaro (State Bar No. 281185)
[e-mail]
FARELLA BRAUN + MARTEL LLP
235 Montgomery Street, 17th Floor
San Francisco, CA 94104
Telephone:
[phone]
Facsimile:
[phone]

Jonathan Shub (State Bar No. 237708)
[e-mail]
SEEGER WEISS LLP
1515 Market Street, Suite 1380
Philadelphia, PA 19101
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]
Jamie Weiss (pro hac vice forthcoming)
[e-mail]
Jeffrey A. Leon (pro hac vice forthcoming)
COMPLEX LITIGATION GROUP LLC
513 Central Avenue Suite 300
Highland Park, Illinois 60035
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]

Attorneys for Defendant
ELECTROLUX HOME PRODUCTS, INC.

8
9

Attorneys for Plaintiffs and the Proposed
Class

10
11

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

12

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

13
14
15

ANTHONY PERLONGO and ERIC P.
FRANK, individually and on behalf of
themselves and all others similarly situated,
Plaintiff,

16
17

v.

18

Case No. 3:13-cv-03961-NC
JOINT STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED]
ORDER TRANSFERRING ACTION TO
THE DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY
PURSUANT TO THE FIRST-TO-FILE
RULE AND 28 U.S.C. § 1404(a)

ELECTROLUX HOME PRODUCTS
INCORPORATED,

19
Defendant.
20
21

Plaintiffs Anthony Perlongo and Eric P. Frank (“Plaintiffs”) and Defendant Electrolux

22

Home Products, Inc. (“Defendant”) (collectively “Parties”), by and through counsel, hereby

23

stipulate that the Court may, and request that it do, (1) transfer this putative class action to the

24

District of New Jersey so that the Parties may seek coordinated or consolidated proceedings with

25

three related putative class actions pending there, and (2) extend the time for Defendant’s

26

response until after Plaintiffs file an anticipated Amended Complaint at the expiration of the

27

demand process under the California Consumers Legal Remedies Act ("CLRA").

28

As support and background for this Stipulation, the Parties agree as follows:
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER
TRANSFERRING ACTION TO D.N.J.
Case No. 3:13-cv-03961-NC

-1-

27910\3875950.1

Case3:13-cv-03961-NC Document7 Filed09/20/13 Page2 of 5

1

1. On June 1, 2012, Mariusz Kuzian v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc., Case No. 1:12-cv-

2

03341-NLH-AMD, (the “Kuzian Action”) was filed in the United States District Court for the

3

District of New Jersey, and an amended complaint was filed on June 14, 2012. The Kuzian

4

Action, asserting claims under New Jersey law, prays for certification of a nationwide class of

5

purchasers of certain of Defendant’s refrigerator products, alleging defects in the ice makers

6

contained in those products.

7

2. On May 14, 2012, Christopher Lopiccolo v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc., Case No.

8

2:12-cv-02397-ADS-ARL, (the “Lopiccolo Action”) was filed in the United States District Court

9

for the Eastern District of New York. The Lopiccolo Action, asserting claims under New York

10

law, prayed for certification of a nationwide class of purchasers of certain of Defendant’s

11

refrigerator products, alleging defects in the ice makers contained in those products.

12

3. On June 27, 2012, the Lopiccolo Action was transferred from the Eastern District of New

13

York to the District of New Jersey pursuant to a Joint Stipulation and Consent Order dated June

14

22, 2012.

15

4. On July 11, 2012, the Honorable Noel L. Hillman of the District of New Jersey entered an

16

order consolidating the Kuzian and Lopiccolo Actions for the purposes of discovery and case

17

management and ordering that the consolidated action proceed under the case number for the

18

Kuzian Action, Case No. 1:12-cv-03341-NLH-AMD.

19

5. On September 25, 2012, the plaintiffs in the Lopiccolo Action filed an amended complaint

20

to add the claims of a new putative class representative, Irma Lederer, and then dismissed the

21

claims of the prior putative class representative, Christopher LoPiccolo. This amended action

22

(the “Lederer Action”), asserting claims under New York law, prays for certification of a New

23

York class of purchasers of certain of Defendant’s refrigerator products, alleging defects in the

24

ice makers contained in those products.

25

6. On January 16, 2013, Robert Bovero v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc., Case No. 2:13-

26

cv-00087-WBS-AC, (the “Bovero Action”) was filed in the Eastern District of California, and a

27

First Amended Complaint was filed on February 28, 2013. The Bovero Action, asserting claims

28

under California law, prays for certification of a California class of purchasers of certain of
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER
TRANSFERRING ACTION TO D.N.J.
Case No. 3:13-cv-03961-NC

-2-

27910\3875950.1

Case3:13-cv-03961-NC Document7 Filed09/20/13 Page3 of 5

1

Defendant’s refrigerator products, alleging defects in the ice makers contained in those products.

2

7. By order dated March 29, 2013 and filed April 1, 2013, the Honorable William B. Shubb

3

of the Eastern District of California transferred the Bovero Action to the District of New Jersey so

4

that the parties could seek coordination/consolidation with the Kuzian and Lederer Actions.

5

8. On May 7, 2013, Judge Hillman entered an order consolidating the Bovero Action with

6

the Kuzian and Lederer Actions for the purposes of discovery and case management and ordering

7

that the consolidated action proceed under the case number for the Kuzian Action, Case No. 1:12-

8

cv-03341-NLH-AMD.

9

9. On August 27, 2013, Anthony Perlongo v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc., Case No.

10

3:13-cv-03961-NC, (the “Perlongo Action” or “this action”) was filed in the Northern District of

11

California. The Perlongo Action, asserting claims under California law, prays for certification of

12

a California class of purchasers of certain of Defendant’s refrigerator products, alleging defects in

13

the ice makers contained in those products.

14

10. The Parties agree that the Kuzian, Lederer, and Bovero Actions were filed before the

15

Perlongo Action, and that the various actions are expected to involve overlapping or substantially

16

similar factual and legal issues.

17
18

11. The Parties further agree that both the Bovero and Perlongo Actions allege claims under
California law and seek certification of a California class.

19

12. The Parties further agree that the Perlongo Action might have been brought in the District

20

of New Jersey and that transferring this action to that court would promote the convenience of the

21

parties, the convenience of the witnesses, and the interests of justice.

22

13. Defendant’s primary place of business, where many of its witnesses and documents

23

would be located, is in Charlotte, North Carolina, which is closer to the District of New Jersey

24

than to this Court.

25
26
27
28

14. Whether or not this action is transferred, Plaintiffs herein intend to file an Amended
Complaint after the expiration of the CLRA demand process.
15. Plaintiffs agree that Defendant need not respond to the Complaint until after Plaintiffs file
their Amended Complaint.
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER
TRANSFERRING ACTION TO D.N.J.
Case No. 3:13-cv-03961-NC

-3-

27910\3875950.1

Case3:13-cv-03961-NC Document7 Filed09/20/13 Page4 of 5

1
2

ACCORDINGLY, THE PARTIES HEREBY AGREE AND STIPULATE THAT:
1.

Pursuant to the first-to-file rule and 28 U.S.C. § 1404(a), the Parties jointly request

3

transfer of this action to the District of New Jersey so that the parties may seek

4

coordinated or consolidated proceedings with the Kuzian, Lederer, and Bovero

5

Actions pending there; and

6
7

2.

Defendant need not respond to Plaintiffs’ Complaint until after Plaintiffs file their
Amended Complaint.

8
9

IT IS SO STIPULATED.

10
11
12

Dated: September 20, 2013

FARELLA BRAUN + MARTEL LLP
By: /s/ C. Brandon Wisoff
C. Brandon Wisoff

13
14

Attorneys for Defendant
ELECTROLUX HOME PRODUCTS INC.

15
16
17

Dated: September 20, 2013

By: /s/ Jonathan Shub
Jonathan Shub
(as authorized on September 20, 2013)

18
19

Attorneys for Plaintiffs ANTHONY PERLONGO
and ERIC FRANK, individually and on behalf of
themselves and all others similarly situated

20
21
22
23

SEEGER WEISS LLP

ATTESTATION PURSUANT TO CIVIL L.R. 5-1
I, Brandon Wisoff, am the ECF User whose ID and password are being used to file this

24

Stipulation and Proposed Order. In Compliance with Civil L.R. 5-1, I hereby attest that the

25

concurrence in the filing of this document has been obtained from each of the signatories. I

26
27
28
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER
TRANSFERRING ACTION TO D.N.J.
Case No. 3:13-cv-03961-NC

-4-

27910\3875950.1

Case3:13-cv-03961-NC Document7 Filed09/20/13 Page5 of 5

1

declare under penalty of perjury under the laws of the United States of America that the foregoing

2

is true and correct.

3

Executed this 20th day of September 2013.

4
__/s/C. Brandon Wisoff_____________________
C. Brandon Wisoff

5
6

[PROPOSED] ORDER

7
8

Based on the stipulation and for good cause shown,

9
10
11
12
13
14

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED:
1.

Defendant need not respond to the Complaint on file herein in light of Plaintiffs’

intention to file an Amended Complaint. In light of the transfer order below, the filing of any
Amended Complaint and Defendant’s response to any Amended Complaint shall be governed by
any applicable rules or orders in the District of New Jersey;

15
16

2.

Under the first-to-file rule and 28 U.S.C. 1404(a), it would be in the interests of the

parties, witnesses, and justice to transfer the action to the United States District Court for the

18

District of New Jersey so that the parties may seek coordination/consolidation with the related

19

cases Mariusz Kuzian v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc., Case No. 1:12-cv-03341-NLH-AMD,

20

Irma Lederer v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc., Case No.: 1:12-cv-03930-NLH-AMD, and

21

Robert Bovero v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc., Case No. 1:13-cv-02063-NLH-AMD. This

22

action is thus transferred to the District of New Jersey.

25

____________________________________
sins
Hon. Nathanael M. Cousinsel M. Cou
hana
t
Judg Na
UNITED STATESe MAGISTRATE JUDGE

28
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER
TRANSFERRING ACTION TO D.N.J.
Case No. 3:13-cv-03961-NC

-5-

FO

A

H

ER

LI

RT

27

TED

NO

20
Dated: _________________, 2013

GRAN

R NIA

UNIT
ED

IT IS SO ORDERED.

24

26

S DISTRICT
TE
C
TA

RT
U
O

23

S

17

N

F
D IS T IC T O
R

C

27910\3875950.1