Winans v. Emeritus Corporation
Filing
84
STIPULATION AND ORDER re Case Management Conference and Mediation. Case Management Statement due by 4/10/2015. Case Management Conference set for 4/17/2015 10:00 AM in Courtroom 1, 17th Floor, San Francisco. Signed by Judge Samuel Conti on 02/12/2015. (tmi, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/12/2015)
1 GUY B. WALLACE (SBN 176151)
gwallace@schneiderwallace.com
2 MARK T. JOHNSON (SBN 76904)
mjohnson@schneiderwallace.com
3 JENNIFER A. UHROWCZIK (SBN 302212)
juhrowczik@schneiderwallace.com
4 SCHNEIDER WALLACE
COTTRELL KONECKY LLP
5 180 Montgomery Street, Suite 2000
San Francisco, CA 94104
6 Telephone: (415) 421-7100
Facsimile: (415) 421-7105
7
Attorneys for Plaintiff and the proposed Class
8 ARVILLE WINANS, by and through his guardian ad litem, RENEE MOULTON
9 Additional Counsel For Plaintiff Listed On Following Page
10 THOMAS J. NOLAN (SBN 66992)
thomas.nolan@skadden.com
11 HARRIET S. POSNER (SBN 116097)
harriet.posner@skadden.com
12 JASON D. RUSSELL (SBN 169219)
jason.russell@skadden.com
13 LISA M. GILFORD (SBN 171641)
lisa.gilford@skadden.com
14 SKADDEN, ARPS, SLATE, MEAGHER & FLOM LLP
300 South Grand Avenue, Suite 3400
15 Los Angeles, California 90071-3144
Telephone: (213) 687-5000
16 Facsimile: (213) 687-5600
17 Attorneys for Defendant
EMERITUS CORPORATION
18
19
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
20
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
21
SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION
22
ARVILLE WINANS, by and through his
23 guardian ad litem, RENEE MOULTON, on his
own behalf and on behalf of others similarly
24 situated,
Plaintiff,
25
v.
26
EMERITUS CORPORATION and DOES 1
27 through 100,
28
Defendants.
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
CASE NO.: 3:13-cv-03962- SC
STIPULATION REGARDING
SCHEDULE ON CASE MANAGEMENT
CONFERENCE AND MEDIATION;
DECLARATION OF GUY B. WALLACE
PURSUANT TO L.R. 6-2 (a)
Stipulation Regarding Schedule on CMC and Mediation – 3:13-cv-03962-SC
1 Additional Counsel For Plaintiff:
2 KATHRYN A. STEBNER (SBN 121088)
SARAH COLBY (SBN 194475)
3 GEORGE KAWAMOTO (SBN 280358)
STEBNER AND ASSOCIATES
4 870 Market Street, Suite 1212
San Francisco, CA 94102
5 Tel: (415) 362-9800
Fax: (415) 362-9801
6
7 MICHAEL D. THAMER (SBN 101440)
LAW OFFICES OF MICHAEL D. THAMER
8 Old Callahan School House
12444 South Highway 3
9 Post Office Box 1568
Callahan, California 96014-1568
10 Tel: (530) 467-5307
Fax: (530) 467-5437
11
12 ROBERT S. ARNS (SBN 65071)
THE ARNS LAW FIRM
13 515 Folsom Street, 3rd Floor
San Francisco, CA 94105
14 Tel: (415) 495-7800
Fax: (415) 495 -7888
15
16 W. TIMOTHY NEEDHAM (SBN 96542)
JANSSEN MALLOY LLP
17 730 Fifth Street
Eureka, CA 95501
18 Tel: (707) 445-2071
Fax: (707) 445-8305
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Stipulation Regarding Schedule on CMC and Mediation – 3:13-cv-03962-SC
1
WHEREAS, there is a Case Management Conference presently set for February 20, 2015;
2
WHEREAS, the parties have agreed to attend mediation of the above-captioned matter at
3 JAMS with the Honorable William Cahill (Ret.) on March 5, 2015;
4
WHEREAS, the parties desire to focus their efforts at this juncture on preparation for the
5 upcoming mediation rather than on issues pertaining to case management herein;
6
WHEREAS, Plaintiff has served written discovery, and the parties have agreed that
7 Defendant may, subject to its objections, make further responsive productions regarding same on a
8 rolling basis commencing on March 26, 2015 with respect to non-privileged documents responsive
9 to Plaintiff’s notices of depositions and the requests for production of documents served therewith;
10
WHEREAS, the parties have agreed that Defendant may, subject to its objections,
11 complete its production of responsive, non-privileged documents with respect to Plaintiff’s First
12 Set of Requests for Production of Documents and Plaintiff’s Second Set of Requests for Production
13 of Documents by no later than May 8, 2015;
14
WHEREAS, the parties agree that the Case Management Conference presently set for
15 February 20, 2015 should be continued to April 17, 2015, or to a similar date convenient to the
16 Court’s schedule;
17
NOW, THEREFORE, Plaintiff and Defendant, by and through their counsel of record and
18 subject to Court approval, hereby stipulate that:
19
1.
The parties shall attend mediation with the Hon. William Cahill (Ret.) at JAMS on
20 March 5, 2015;
21
2.
The Case Management Conference set for February 20, 2015 be rescheduled for
22 April 17, 2015 or a date shortly thereafter convenient to the Court’s schedule;
23
3.
Unless otherwise agreed by the parties in connection with the upcoming mediation,
24 Defendant shall resume a rolling production of non-privileged documents, subject to its objections,
25 in response to Plaintiff’s Notices of Deposition and the accompanying Requests for Production of
26 Documents by no later than
27 March 26, 2015;
28
3
Stipulation Regarding Schedule on CMC & Mediation – 3:13-cv-03962-SC
1
4.
Unless otherwise agreed by the parties in connection with the upcoming mediation,
2 Defendant shall complete its production of non-privileged documents, subject to its objections, in
3 response to Plaintiff’s First Set of Requests for Production of Documents and Plaintiff’s Second
4 Set of Requests for Production of Documents by no later than May 8, 2015.
5
6
The e-filing attorney hereby attests that he retains on file all holographic signatures
7 corresponding to any signatures indicated by a conformed signature (/S/) within this e-filed
8 document.
9
IT IS SO STIPULATED.
10
11
DATED: February 12, 2015
SKADDEN, ARPS, SLATE, MEAGHER & FLOM LLP
12
By:
13
/s/ Thomas J. Nolan
Thomas J. Nolan
Attorneys for Defendant
14 DATED: February 12, 2015
SCHNEIDER WALLACE COTTRELL KONECKY LLP
15
16
By:
17
/s/ Guy B. Wallace
Guy B. Wallace
Attorneys for Plaintiff and the proposed Class
18
19
PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED.
21 DATED: ______________
02/12/2015
S
UNIT
ED
By:
el Conti
NO
RT
26
amu
Judge S
27
H
ER
28
FO
25
R NIA
Samuel Conti
United States District Judge
24
LI
23
RT
U
O
22
S DISTRICT
TE
C
TA
A
20
N
F
D IS T IC T O
R
4
Stipulation Regarding Schedule on CMC & Mediation – 3:13-cv-03962-SC
C
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?