King.com Limited v. 6 Waves LLC

Filing 35

JOINT STIPULATION AND ORDER TO EXTEND TIME TO ANSWER PLAINTIFF'S MOTION TO STRIKE. Signed by Judge Maxine M. Chesney on December 16, 2013. (mmclc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 12/16/2013)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 LAURENCE F. PULGRAM (CSB No. 115163) lpulgram@fenwick.com JENNIFER LLOYD KELLY (CSB No. 193416) jkelly@fenwick.com FENWICK & WEST LLP 555 California Street, 12th Floor San Francisco, CA 94104 Telephone: 415.875.2300 Facsimile: 415.281.1350 Attorneys for Plaintiff KING.COM LIMITED 7 8 9 10 11 DURIE TANGRI LLP SONALI D. MAITRA (SBN 254896) smaitra@durietangri.com ALEX J. FEERST (SBN 270537) afeerst@durietangri.com 217 Leidesdorff Street San Francisco, CA 94111 Telephone: 415-362-6666 Facsimile: 415-236-6300 12 13 Attorneys for Defendants 6WAVES LLC and SIX WAVES INC. 14 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 15 FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 16 SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION 17 KING.COM LIMITED, a Malta Corporation, 18 19 20 21 22 Plaintiff, v. 6 WAVES LLC, a Delaware Limited Liability Company, SIX WAVES INC., a British Virgin Islands Company, and DOES 1-5, Case No. 3:13-cv-03977-MMC JOINT STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO EXTEND TIME TO ANSWER PLAINTIFF’S MOTION TO STRIKE Date: Time: Ctrm: Judge: January 17, 2014 9:00 a.m. 7, 19th Floor Honorable Maxine M. Chesney Defendants. 23 24 25 26 27 28 JOINT STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO EXTEND TIME TO ANSWER PLAINTIFF’S MOTION TO STRIKE / CASE NO. 3:13-CV-03977-MMC 1 2 3 WHEREAS, plaintiff King.com Limited (“King”) filed its Motion to Strike Defendants’ Affirmative Defenses in this matter on December 9, 2013; WHEREAS, counsel has agreed to extend the deadlines for the defendants 6 Waves LLC and Six 4 Waves Inc. (“Defendants”) to respond to plaintiff’s Motion to Strike Defendants’ Affirmative Defenses 5 and King’s Reply in Support of its Motion to Strike Defendants’ Affirmative Defenses. 6 7 8 9 10 Defendants shall have through and including December 30, 2013 to file their Opposition to Motion to Strike Defendants’ Affirmative Defenses. Plaintiff shall have through and including January 3, 2014 to file its Reply in Support of its Motion to Strike Defendants’ Affirmative Defenses. Dated: December 13, 2013 FENWICK & WEST LLP 11 /s/ Jennifer Lloyd Kelly By: 12 JENNIFER LLOYD KELLY 13 Attorneys for Plaintiff KING.COM LIMITED 14 15 16 Dated: December 13, 2013 DURIE TANGRI LLP /s/ Alex J. Feerst 17 By: 18 ALEX J. FEERST 19 Attorneys for Defendants 6 WAVES LLC and SIX WAVES INC. 20 21 22 FILER’S ATTESTATION Pursuant to Civil L.R. 5-1(i)(3), regarding signatures, I, Alex J. Feerst, attest that concurrence in 23 the filing of this document has been obtained. 24 Dated: December 13, 2013 /s/ Alex J. Feerst ALEX J. FEERST 25 26 27 28 2 JOINT STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO EXTEND TIME TO ANSWER PLAINTIFF’S MOTION TO STRIKE / CASE NO. 3:13-CV-03977-MMC 1 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE 2 I certify that all counsel of record is being served on December 13, 2013 with a copy of this 3 document via the Court’s CM/ECF system. 4 /s/ Alex J. Feerst ALEX J. FEERST 5 6 PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED. 7 8 9 DATED: __________________ December 16, 2013 __________________________________________ The Honorable Maxine M. Chesney United States District Court Judge 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 3 JOINT STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO EXTEND TIME TO ANSWER PLAINTIFF’S MOTION TO STRIKE / CASE NO. 3:13-CV-03977-MMC

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?