King.com Limited v. 6 Waves LLC

Filing 80

Order by Magistrate Judge Donna M. Ryu DENYING MOTION FOR ADMINISTRATIVE RELIEF 76 ; NOTICE OF REFERENCE AND ORDER RE DISCOVERY PROCEDURES. The parties are ordered to comply with the procedure ordered by Judge Chesney 78 and to file a joint letter by no later than June 25, 2014. (dmrlc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/19/2014)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

11
For the Northern District of California

United States District Court

10
KING.COM LIMITED,

12

No. C-13-03977-MMC (DMR)

Plaintiff(s),

13

v.

14

6 WAVES LLC,

15

ORDER DENYING MOTION FOR
ADMINISTRATIVE RELIEF [DOCKET
NO. 76]; NOTICE OF REFERENCE AND
ORDER RE DISCOVERY
PROCEDURES

Defendant(s).
___________________________________/

16
17
18

TO ALL PARTIES AND COUNSEL OF RECORD:
The above matter has been referred to Magistrate Judge Donna M. Ryu for resolution of

19

Plaintiff’s motion for administrative relief. [Docket No. 76.] The motion is denied without

20

prejudice. The parties are ordered to comply with the procedure ordered by Judge Chesney [Docket

21

No. 78] and to file a joint letter by no later than June 25, 2014. For any future discovery disputes,

22

the parties shall comply with the procedures set forth in this order.

23

Parties shall comply with the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and the Northern District of

24

California’s Local Rules, General Orders, and Standing Orders. Local rules, general orders,

25

standing orders, and instructions for using the Court's Electronic Case Filing system are available at

26

http://www.cand.uscourts.gov. Failure to comply with any of the rules or orders may be a ground

27

for sanctions.

28

RESOLUTION OF DISCOVERY DISPUTES

1

In order to respond to discovery disputes in a flexible, cost-effective and efficient manner,

2

the court uses the following procedure. The parties shall not file formal discovery motions. Instead,

3

as required by the federal and local rules, the parties shall first meet and confer to try to resolve their

4

disagreements. The meet and confer session must be in person or by telephone, and may not be

5

conducted by letter, e-mail, or fax. If disagreements remain, the parties shall file a joint letter no

6

later than five business days after the meet and confer session, unless otherwise directed by the

7

court. Lead trial counsel for both parties must sign the letter, which shall include an attestation

8

that the parties met and conferred in person or by telephone regarding all issues prior to filing the

9

letter. Going issue-by-issue, the joint letter shall describe each unresolved issue, summarize each
party’s position with appropriate legal authority; and provide each party’s final proposed

11
For the Northern District of California

United States District Court

10

compromise before moving to the next issue. The joint letter shall not exceed ten pages without

12

leave of court. Parties are expected to plan for and cooperate in preparing the joint letter so

13

that each side has adequate time to address the arguments. In the rare instance that a joint letter

14

is not possible, each side may submit a letter not to exceed four pages, which shall include an

15

explanation of why a joint letter was not possible. The parties shall submit one exhibit to the letter

16

that only sets forth each disputed discovery request in full, followed immediately by the objections

17

and/or responses thereto. No other information shall be included in any such exhibit. No other

18

exhibits shall be submitted without prior approval by the court. The court will review the

19

submission(s) and determine whether formal briefing or proceedings are necessary. Discovery

20

letter briefs must be e-filed under the Civil Events category of Motions and Related Filings >

21

Motions - General > "Discovery Letter Brief".

22

In the event that a discovery hearing is ordered, the court has found that it is often efficient

23

and beneficial for counsel to appear in person. This provides the opportunity, where appropriate, to

24

engage counsel in resolving aspects of the discovery dispute while remaining available to rule on

25

any disputes that counsel are not able to resolve. For this reason, the court expects counsel to appear

26

in person. Permission for a party to attend by telephone may be granted, in the court's discretion,

27

upon written request made at least one week in advance of the hearing if the court determines that

28

good cause exists to excuse personal attendance, and that personal attendance is not needed in order

2

1

to have an effective discovery hearing. The facts establishing good cause must be set forth in the

2

request.

3

In emergencies during discovery events (such as depositions), any party may, after

4

exhausting good faith attempts to resolve disputed issues, seek judicial intervention pursuant to Civil

5

L.R. 37-1(b) by contacting the court through the courtroom deputy. If the court is unavailable, the

6

discovery event shall proceed with objections noted for the record.

7

CHAMBERS COPIES AND PROPOSED ORDERS

8

Pursuant to Civil L.R. 5-1(e)(7) and 5-2(b), parties must lodge an extra paper copy of certain

9

submit it to the Oakland Clerk’s Office.

11
For the Northern District of California

United States District Court

10

filings and mark it as a copy for “Chambers.” Please three-hole punch the chambers copy and

Any stipulation or proposed order submitted by an e-filing party shall be submitted by email

12

to [e-mail] as a word processing attachment on the same day the document is e-

13

filed. This address should only be used for this stated purpose unless otherwise directed by the

14

court.

15

PRIVILEGE LOGS

16

If a party withholds information that is responsive to a discovery request by claiming that it

17

is privileged or otherwise protected from discovery, that party shall promptly prepare and provide a

18

privilege log that is sufficiently detailed and informative for the opposing party to assess whether a

19

document’s designation as privileged is justified. See Fed.R.Civ.P. 26(b)(5). The privilege log shall

20

set forth the privilege relied upon and specify separately for each document or for each category of

21

similarly situated documents:

22

(a) the title and description of the document, including number of pages or

23

Bates-number range;

24

(b) the subject matter addressed in the document;

25

(c) the identity and position of its author(s);

26

(d) the identity and position of all addressees and recipients;

27

(e) the date the document was prepared and, if different, the date(s) on which it was

28

sent to or shared with persons other than its author(s); and

3

1

(f) the specific basis for the claim that the document is privileged or protected.

2

Communications involving trial counsel that post-date the filing of the complaint need not be

3

placed on a privilege log. Failure to furnish this information promptly may be deemed a waiver of

4

the privilege or protection.

S
Dated: June 19, 2014

NO

9

RT

10

United States Magistrate Judge

11
For the Northern District of California

M. Ryu

ER

H

United States District Court

onna
Judge D
DONNA M. RYU

12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28

4

A

8

R NIA

7

DERED

O OR
IT IS S

FO

IT IS SO ORDERED.

LI

UNIT
ED

6

RT
U
O

5

S DISTRICT
TE
C
TA

N

D IS T IC T
R

OF

C