King.com Limited v. 6 Waves LLC
Filing
96
ORDER RE: STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER FOR ENTRY OF CONSENT JUDGMENT; DIRECTIONS TO PARTIES The parties are directed to submit, no later than October 1, 2014, a copy of the settlement agreement, or, in the alternative, a stipulation and proposed order that do not provide the Court will retain jurisdiction over the settlement agreement. Signed by Judge Maxine M. Chesney on September 18, 2014. (mmclc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/18/2014)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
8
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
9
For the Northern District of California
United States District Court
10
KING.COM LIMITED, a Malta Corporation,
11
No. C-13-03977 MMC
Plaintiff,
12
ORDER RE: STIPULATION AND
[PROPOSED] ORDER FOR ENTRY OF
CONSENT JUDGMENT; DIRECTIONS
TO PARTIES
v.
13
14
15
6 WAVES LLC, a Delaware Limited Liability
Company, SIX WAVES INC., a British Virgin
Islands Company, and DOES 1-5
Defendants.
16
/
17
Before the Court is the parties’ “Stipulation and [Proposed] Order for Entry of
18
19
Consent Judgment,” filed September 17, 2014.
In said filing, the parties state the above-titled action is subject to dismissal with
20
21
prejudice, in light of a settlement agreement, and request the Court retain jurisdiction “for
22
the purposes of the enforcement of the Settlement Agreement.” (See Stipulation at 2:8-
23
10.) Plaintiffs, however, have not submitted a copy of the settlement agreement and, in the
24
absence thereof, the Court declines to retain jurisdiction for the purposes proposed.
25
//
26
//
27
//
28
//
1
Accordingly, plaintiffs are hereby DIRECTED to submit, no later than October 1,
2
2014, a copy of the settlement agreement, or, in the alternative, a stipulation and proposed
3
order that do not provide the Court will retain jurisdiction over the settlement agreement.
4
IT IS SO ORDERED.
5
6
Dated: September 18, 2014
MAXINE M. CHESNEY
United States District Judge
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?