Velarde et al v. City of Union City et al

Filing 130

ORDER FOR JURY REFRESHMENTS. Signed by Judge James Donato on 12/2/15. (lrcS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 12/3/2015)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 7 AARON VELARDE, et al., Case No. 13-cv-04011-JD Plaintiffs, 8 v. PROPOSED VOIR DIRE 9 10 United States District Court Northern District of California 11 UNION CITY POLICE DEPARTMENT, et al., Defendants. 12 The parties did not file any proposed voir dire questions. Consequently, the Court will ask 13 these voir dire questions in addition to the Court’s standard questions. The parties are responsible 14 for filing a final witness list and a list of all attorneys involved in the case for use during voir dire. 15 The parties should file the lists with the Court by December 4, 2015, and bring at least 10 copies 16 of each to jury selection on December 7, 2015. 17 18 IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: December 3, 2015 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 ________________________ JAMES DONATO United States District Judge VOIR DIRE QUESTIONS 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 United States District Court Northern District of California 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 1. Have you or anyone close to you ever worked for a lawyer or law firm? 2. Do you or anyone close to you have experience in the legal profession? 3. Have you ever had to appear in court, or in any court proceeding, as a plaintiff, defendant, victim or witness? 4. Have you or anyone close to you ever worked in any public safety, law enforcement or criminal justice system job? 5. Have you or anyone close to you worked for any other federal, state or local government agency? 6. Have you or anyone close to you worked for Union City? 7. Do you have any strong positive or negative feelings about Union City? 8. Have you or anyone close to you worked for the Union City Police Department? 9. Do you have any strong positive or negative feelings about the Union City Police Department? 10. Would you consider the testimony of a law enforcement witness to be less credible or more credible than the testimony of any other witness for any reason? 11. Do you think lawsuits involving civil rights claims are unfair or unjust and should not be brought to court? 12. Do you have any strong positive or negative feelings about awarding damages for violations of civil rights? 13. Do you think lawsuits involving excessive force claims against the police are unfair or unjust and should not be brought to court? 14. Do you have any strong positive or negative feelings about awarding damages for claims of excessive force by the police? 15. Do you have any difficulty understanding or reading the English language? 16. On your seats are lists of attorneys involved with this case and potential witnesses. Do you know or are you familiar with any of the attorneys? 2 1 17. Do you know or are you familiar with any of the potential witnesses? 2 18. Is there anything I have not asked you about that you believe could affect your ability to be 3 a fair and impartial juror? 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 United States District Court Northern District of California 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 3

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?