Cotter v. Lyft, Inc.

Filing 117

ORDER (AS MODIFIED) granting 116 Plaintiffs' Amended Request to be excused from personal attendance at Settlement Conference. Signed by Magistrate Judge Donna M. Ryu on 4/27/15. (ig, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/27/2015)

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Case No.: 3:13-cv-04065-VC (DMR)

PATRICK COTTER and ALEJANDRA
MACIEL, on behalf of themselves and all others
similarly situated,

[PROPOSED] ORDER RE:
PLAINTIFFS’ AMENDED REQUEST
TO BE EXCUSED FROM PERSONAL
ATTENDANCE AT SETTLEMENT
CONFERENCE (AS MODIFIED)

Plaintiffs,
v.
LYFT, INC.,
Defendant.

ORDER (AS MODIFIED)
Having considered Plaintiffs’ Amended Request to be Excused from Personal Attendance
at the Parties’ Settlement Conference, the Court hereby orders as follows:
Plaintiffs are not required to personally attend the parties’ settlement conference, but

UNIT
ED

RT

onna M
Judge D

A

H

ER

. Ryu

LI

NO

United States Magistrate Judge

N

F
D IS T IC T O
R

[PROPOSED] ORDER – CASE NO. 3:13-CV-04065-VC (DMR)
1

R NIA

D
RDERE
S SO O IED
IT I
DIF
AS MO
________________________________________
FO

April 27, 2015
Date: _____________________

C

TA

RT
U
O

S

shall be available to participate by telephone throughout the entire conference.
If the court concludes that the absence of Plaintiffs are interfering with the settlement
conference, the court may continue the settlement conference and may order personal attendance
by each party including Plaintiffs.
S DISTRICT
IT IS SO ORDERED.
TE

C