Cotter v. Lyft, Inc.

Filing 136

Order granting 135 Stipulation Re Class Certification Briefing Schedule.(knm, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/16/2015)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 KEKER & VAN NEST LLP RACHAEL E. MENY - # 178514 rmeny@kvn.com R. JAMES SLAUGHTER - # 192813 rslaughter@kvn.com MICHELLE YBARRA - # 260697 mybarra@kvn.com ALEXANDER DRYER - # 291625 adryer@kvn.com 633 Battery Street San Francisco, CA 94111-1809 Telephone: 415 391 5400 Facsimile: 415 397 7188 OGLETREE, DEAKINS, NASH, SMOAK & STEWART, P.C. THOMAS M. MCINERNEY - # 162055 tmm@ogletreedeakins.com CHRISTOPHER M. AHEARN - # 239089 chris.ahearn@ogletreedeakins.com Steuart Tower, Suite 1300 One Market Plaza San Francisco, CA 94105 Telephone: 415 442 4810 Facsimile: 415 442 4870 13 14 Attorneys for Defendant LYFT, INC. 15 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 16 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 17 18 19 PATRICK COTTER and ALEJANDRA MACIEL, on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated, Plaintiffs, 20 21 22 23 Case No. 3:13-cv-04065-VC STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER REGARDING CLASS CERTIFICATION BRIEFING SCHEDULE v. Judge: Hon. Vince Chhabria Date Filed: Trial Date: September 3, 2013 None Set LYFT, INC., Defendant. 24 25 26 27 28 STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER RE CLASS CERTIFICATION BRIEFING SCHEDULE Case No. 3:13-cv-04065-VC 955374 1 1 The undersigned parties, by and through their respective counsel, do hereby stipulate : 2 WHEREAS, on April 9, 2015, the Court issued the Amended Case Management Order 3 (Dkt. 110) requiring all discovery relating to class certification to be completed by no later than 4 September 24, 2015; 5 6 WHEREAS, the Court set the hearing for plaintiffs’ anticipated motion for class certification for December 17, 2015 at 10:00 a.m.; 7 WHEREAS, the Court ordered the parties to confer and submit a stipulated proposed 8 briefing schedule in which the plaintiffs’ reply brief is filed no later than two weeks before the 9 hearing; WHEREAS, the parties have met and conferred and jointly request that the Court enter the 10 11 following order: 12 Plaintiffs shall file their Motion for Class Certification on October 8, 2015; 13 Defendant shall file its Opposition to the Motion for Class Certification on November 17, 14 2015; and Plaintiffs shall file their Reply in Support of the Motion for Class Certification on 15 16 December 3, 2015. IT IS SO STIPULATED. 17 18 19 Dated: June 12, 2015 20 KEKER & VAN NEST LLP By: 21 22 23 /s/ Michelle Ybarra RACHAEL E. MENY R. JAMES SLAUGHTER MICHELLE YBARRA ALEXANDER DRYER Attorneys for Defendant LYFT, INC. 24 25 26 27 28 1 As discussed at the hearing held on June 4, 2015, Plaintiffs may renew their request for an accelerated hearing and briefing schedule on their motion for class certification if the Price v. Lyft case is not stayed by the state court. Plaintiffs have agreed to this schedule on the assumption that the hearing on Plaintiffs’ motion for class certification in this case will remain December 17, 2015. 1 STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER RE CLASS CERTIFICATION BRIEFING SCHEDULE Case No. 3:13-cv-04065-VC 955374 1 Dated: June 12, 2015 OGLETREE, DEAKINS, NASH, SMOAK & STEWART, P.C. 2 3 By: 4 5 /s/ Thomas M. McInerney THOMAS M. MCINERNEY CHRISTOPHER M. AHEARN Attorneys for Defendant LYFT, INC. 6 7 8 Dated: June 12, 2015 LICHTEN & LISS-RIORDAN, P.C. 9 By: 10 /s/ Shannon Liss-Riordan SHANNON LISS-RIORDAN 11 Attorneys for Plaintiffs PATRICK COTTER and ALEJANDRA MACIEL, on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated 12 13 14 Dated: June 12, 2015 CARLSON LEGAL SERVICES 15 16 By: 17 18 /s/ Matthew D. Carlson MATTHEW D. CARLSON Attorneys for Plaintiffs PATRICK COTTER and ALEJANDRA MACIEL, on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated 19 20 21 22 PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED. 23 24 25 June 16, 2015 Dated: _______________________ _____________________________________ HONORABLE VINCE CHHABRIA United States District Judge 26 27 28 2 STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER RE CLASS CERTIFICATION BRIEFING SCHEDULE Case No. 3:13-cv-04065-VC 955374

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?