Cotter v. Lyft, Inc.

Filing 218

ORDER RE ORAL ARGUMENT. Signed by Judge Vince Chhabria on 6/1/2016. (knm, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/1/2016)

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

PATRICK COTTER, et al.,

Case No. 13-cv-04065-VC

Plaintiffs,
ORDER RE ORAL ARGUMENT

v.
LYFT, INC., et al.,
Defendants.

At the hearing on the motion for preliminary approval of the revised class action
settlement, the parties should be prepared to discuss the following, assuming it is possible to
gather this information in such a short timeframe:


What is the maximum possible restitution value under Cal. Bus. & Prof. Code §
17200 for Lyft's alleged violations of Cal. Labor Code § 351 in the period from
August 2014 to August 2015, as described by the Complaint in Zamora v. Lyft,
Inc., No. 16-cv-02558-VC?



What is the maximum possible restitution value under Cal. Bus. & Prof. Code §
17200 for Lyft's alleged violations of Cal. Labor Code § 351 in the period from
August 2015 to the present, as described by the Complaint in Zamora v. Lyft, Inc.,
No. 16-cv-02558-VC?



Would it be feasible and appropriate to allocate a portion of the existing proposed
settlement amount to these claims?

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: June 1, 2016
______________________________________
VINCE CHHABRIA
United States District Judge

2