Adobe Systems Incorporated v. Evaluesoftware.Com,LLC et al

Filing 19

ORDER, Motions terminated: 18 STIPULATION WITH PROPOSED ORDER re 14 Clerks Notice Stipulated Request to Reschedule Case Management Conference and all Related Dates filed by Adobe Systems Incorporated. Initial Case Management Conference set for 12/13/13/ is continued to 2/28/2014 02:30 PM in Courtroom 10, 19th Floor, San Francisco.. Signed by Judge Susan Illston on 12/9/13. (tfS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 12/9/2013)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 13 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 14 15 ADOBE SYSTEMS INCORPORATED, a Delaware Corporation, 16 Plaintiff, 17 18 19 20 21 v. EVALUESOFTWARE.COM, LLC, a Nevada Limited Liability Company; JUSTIN CATES, an Individual; and DOES 1-10, Inclusive, Case No.: CV13-04078 SI [PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING STIPULATED REQUEST TO RESCHEDULE CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE Current CMC: December 13, 2013 [Proposed] CMC: TBD Honorable Susan Illston Courtroom 10 Defendants. 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 The Court, having read and considered the Stipulated Request to Re-Schedule Case Management Conference filed by Plaintiff Adobe Systems Incorporated (“Plaintiff”) and Defendants eVauleSoftware.com, LLC and Justin Cates (“Defendants”), and good cause being found, hereby GRANTS the stipulated request. -1[PROPOSED] ORDER – CASE NO.: CV13-04078 SI 1 2 IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Case Management Conference presently scheduled on December 13, 2013 shall be continued to a date to be determined by the Court. 3 IT IS HEREBY FURTHER ORDERED that Defendants shall have up to and including 4 January 17, 2014 to file their response to Plaintiff’s Complaint, which may include motions to 5 transfer venue and/or to dismiss the action. 6 7 8 9 10 11 9 DATED: December ____, 2013 By: ________________________________ Honorable Susan Illston United States District Court Judge Northern District of California The initial case management conference is continued to 2/28/1 4 at 2:30 p.m. 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 -2[PROPOSED] ORDER – CASE NO.: CV13-04078 SI PROOF OF SERVICE 1 2 3 I am a resident of the State of California, over the age of eighteen years, and not a party to the within action. My business address is Johnson & Pham 6355 Topanga Canyon Blvd., Suite 326, Woodland Hills, CA 91367. On December 6, 2013, I served the within document(s): [PROPOSED] ORDER 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21  FACSIMILE - by transmitting via facsimile the document(s) listed above to the fax number(s) set forth on the attached Telecommunications Cover Page(s) on this date before 5:00 p.m.  MAIL - by placing the document(s) listed above in a sealed envelope with postage thereon fully prepaid, in the United States mail at Los Angeles, California addressed as set forth below.  PERSONAL SERVICE - by personally delivering the document(s) listed above to the person(s) at the address(es) set forth below.  CM/ECF - by electronically transmitting the document(s) listed above to: William J. Frimel, Esq. Bill@hsfllp.com Heffernan Seubert & French, LLP 1075 Curtis Street Menlo Park, CA 94025 I am readily familiar with the firm's practice of collection and processing correspondence for mailing. Under that practice it would be deposited with the U.S. Postal Service on that same day with postage thereon fully prepaid in the ordinary course of business. I am aware that on motion of the party served, service is presumed invalid if postal cancellation date or postage meter date is more than one day after date of deposit for mailing in affidavit. I declare that I am employed in the office of a member of the bar of this court at whose direction the service was made. Executed on December 6, 2013, at Los Angeles, California. __________/s/_________________ Evelyn Ruano 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 -3[PROPOSED] ORDER – CASE NO.: CV13-04078 SI

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?