Fenerjian v. Nong Shim Company, Ltd et al

Filing 119

STIPULATION AND ORDER RE SCHEDULING OF CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE granting 118 STIPULATION. Case Management Statement due by 12/9/2014. Case Management Conference continued to 12/16/2014 02:00 PM in Courtroom 2, 17th Floor, San Francisco. Signed by Judge William H. Orrick on 11/17/2014. (jmdS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/17/2014)

1
2
3
4

Alan R. Plutzik (State Bar No. 77785)
BRAMSON, PLUTZIK, MAHLER
& BIRKHAEUSER LLP
2125 Oak Grove Road
Walnut Creek, CA 94598
Telephone: [phone]
[e-mail]

5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12

Interim Liaison Counsel for the Indirect Purchaser Plaintiffs
Christopher L. Lebsock (State Bar No. 184546)
HAUSFELD LLP
44 Montgomery Street, Suite 3400
San Francisco, California 94104
Telephone: [phone]
[e-mail]
Interim Co-Lead Counsel for the Direct Purchaser Plaintiffs
[Additional Counsel Listed on Signature Page]
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

13

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

14

SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION

15
16
17

Case No. 3:13-cv-04115-WHO
IN RE KOREAN RAMEN ANTITRUST
LITIGATION

18

STIPULATION AND ORDER RE
SCHEDULING OF CASE
MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE

19

Judge: Hon. William H. Orrick

20

This Document Relates to:

21

All Actions

22
23
24
25
26
27
28
STIPULATION AND ORDER RE SCHEDULING OF CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE
72060

1
STIPULATION

2

All ten (10) Indirect Purchaser Plaintiffs in Consolidated Action Case no. 3:13-cv-04115-

3
4
5
6
7

WHO the “Indirect Purchaser Action”), all nine (9) Direct Purchaser Plaintiffs in Consolidated
Action Case No. 3:13-cv-04148-WHO (the “Direct Purchaser Action”), by and through their
respective counsel of record, and all seven (7) Defendants by and through their respective counsel
of record, stipulate as follows:
WHEREAS, this Court, on November 4, 2014, issued an Order (the “Order”) granting in

8
9
10

part and denying in part Defendants’ Motions to Dismiss the Consolidated Amended Complaints
filed in the Indirect Purchaser Action and the Direct Purchaser Action (collectively, the “Actions”);
WHEREAS, in its Order, the Court set a Case Management Conference in the Actions

11
12

(“CMC”) for November 25, 2014, at 2:00 p.m.;
WHEREAS, the November 25 date, which falls during the week of Thanksgiving, conflicts

13
14

with prior commitments of both Plaintiffs’ and Defendants’ counsel in the Actions; and
WHEREAS, both Plaintiffs and Defendants in the Actions (the “Parties”) wish to continue

15
16

the Case Management to an early date convenient to all counsel and the Court;
WHEREAS, all parties wish to avoid doubt about the application of Rule 12(a)(4)(A) to the

17
18
19
20

various Defendants’ schedule for answering or otherwise responding to either of the previouslyfiled consolidated complaints in view of the Order, and to improve judicial economy and effective
case management;
NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED, subject to approval of the Court,

21
22
23
24
25
26
27

that:
1.

the Case Management Conference heretofore scheduled for November 25, 2014, at

2:00 p.m., be continued to December 16, 2014, at 2:00 p.m., at the United States Courthouse,
Courtroom 2, 17th Floor, 450 Golden Gate Avenue, San Francisco, CA 94102;
2.

the Parties shall file a Joint Case Management Conference Statement no later than

December 9, 2014; and

28

1
STIPULATION AND ORDER RE SCHEDULING OF CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE
72060

1
2
3
4
5
6

3.

Defendants that were dismissed from the Amended Complaints [Dkt. Nos. 61 and

62] (“Amended Complaints”) pursuant to the Court’s November 4, 2014 order need not respond to
the Amended Complaints. Defendants that were not dismissed pursuant to the Court’s November
4, 2014 Order need not answer the Amended Complaints before the Case Management Conference,
and the topic of deadlines for responding to the then-operative complaints will be addressed in the
Joint Case Management Statement and at the Case Management Conference

7
IT IS SO STIPULATED.
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28

PLAINTIFFS’ OPPOSITION TO DEFENDANTS’ MOTION TO DISMISS THE INDIRECT PURCHASER PLAINTIFFS’ STATE LAW
CLAIMS UNDER FED. R. CIV. P. 12(B)(1) AND 12(B)(6); MEMORANDUM OF POINTS AND AUTHORITIES

2

1

DATED: November 14, 2014

2
3
4
5
6

/s/
Alan R. Plutzik
Alan R. Plutzik (State Bar No. 77785)
BRAMSON, PLUTZIK, MAHLER
& BIRKHAEUSER LLP
2125 Oak Grove Road
Walnut Creek, CA 94598
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]
[e-mail]
Interim Liaison Counsel For the Indirect
Purchaser Plaintiffs

7
8

Mark P. Kindall (State Bar No. 138703)
Robert A. Izard (admitted pro hac vice)
IZARD NOBEL LLP
29 South Main Street, Suite 305
West Hartford, CT 06107
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]
[e-mail]
[e-mail]

9
10
11
12
13
14

Interim Lead Counsel for the Indirect Purchaser
Plaintiffs

15
16
17
18
19

November 14, 2014

___________/s/_Christopher L. Lebsock_______
Christopher L. Lebsock (State Bar No. 184546)
HAUSFELD LLP
44 Montgomery Street, Suite 3400
San Francisco, California 94104
Telephone: [phone]
[e-mail]

20
21
22
23
24
25
26

Lee Albert (pro hac to be filed)
Gregory B. Linkh (pro hac to be filed)
GLANCY BINKOW & GOLDBERG LLP
122 East 42nd Street, Suite 2920
New York, NY 10168
TEL: [phone]
EMAIL: [e-mail]
[e-mail]
Interim Lead Counsel for the Direct Purchaser
Plaintiffs

27
28
STIPULATION AND ORDER RE SCHEDULING OF CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE
72060

3

1
2

DATED: November 14, 2014

3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10

____________/s/ Mark C. Dosker_______________
Mark C. Dosker (State Bar No. 114789)
J. Brady Dugan (admitted pro hac vice)
Anne C. Goodwin (State Bar No. 216244)
Kate E. Kim (admitted pro hac vice)
SQUIRE PATTON BOGGS (US) LLP
275 Battery Street, Suite 2600
San Francisco, CA 94111
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]
[e-mail]
[e-mail]
[e-mail]
[e-mail]
Attorneys for Defendants Nongshim America, Inc.,
and Nongshim Co., Ltd.

11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22

DATED: November 14, 2014

____________/s/ Joel S. Sanders________________
Joel S. Sanders (State Bar No. 107234)
Lindsey E. Haswell (State Bar No. 227484)
Minae Yu (State Bar No. 268814)
GIBSON, DUNN & CRUTCHER, LLP
555 Mission Street, Suite 3000
San Francisco, CA 94105-2933
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]
[e-mail]
[e-mail]
[e-mail]
Attorneys for Defendants Ottogi America, Inc. and
Ottogi Company, Ltd.

23
24
25
26
27
28

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER RE SCHEDULING OF CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE
72060

4

1

DATED: November 14, 2014

2
3
4
5

___________/s/ Elizabeth D. Mann______________
Elizabeth D. Mann (State Bar No. 106524)
MAYER BROWN, LLP
350 South Grand Avenue, 25tth Floor
Los Angeles, CA
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]
[e-mail]
Attorneys for Defendant SamYang Foods Company,
Ltd.

6
7
8

DATED: November 14, 2014

9
10
11
12
13

Attorneys for Defendant Sam Yang (U.S.A.), Inc.

14
15
16
17
18
19
20

___________/s/ Edward W. Suh________________
Michael K. Suh (State Bar No. 213855)
Edward W. Suh (State Bar No. 265356)
LAW OFFICES OF MICHAEL K. SUH AND
ASSOCIATES
3810 Wilshire Boulevard, Suite 1212
Los Angeles, CA 90010
Telephone: [phone]
[e-mail]
[e-mail]

DATED: November 14, 2014

___________/s/ Edward B. Schwartz____________
Edward B. Schwartz
STEPTOE & JOHNSON, LLP
Edward B. Schwartz (admitted pro hac vice)
1330 Connecticut Avenue, N.W.
Washington, DC 20036
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]
[e-mail]

25

Seong H. Kim (State Bar No. 166604)
Matthew D. Taggart (State Bar No. 227482)
2121 Avenue of the Stars, Suite 2800
Los Angeles, CA 90067
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]
[e-mail]
[e-mail]

26

Attorneys for Defendants Paldo Co., Ltd., and Korea
Yakult Co., Ltd.

21
22
23
24

27
28

STIPULATION AND ORDER RE SCHEDULING OF CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE
72060

5

1

ORDER

2

Pursuant to Stipulation, the Case Management Conference heretofore scheduled for

3

November 25, 2014, at 2:00 p.m., shall be continued to December 16, 2014, at 2:00 p.m., at the

4

United States Courthouse, Courtroom 2, 17th Floor, 450 Golden Gate Avenue, San Francisco, CA

5

94102. The Parties shall file a Joint Case Management Conference Statement no later than

6

December 9, 2014. No Defendant’s further response to any complaint presently on file is due

7

before the Case Management Conference, and the topic of deadlines for responding to the then-

8

operative complaints will be addressed in the Joint Case Management Statement and at the Case

9

Management Conference.

10
11
12

IT IS SO ORDERED.
DATED: November 17, 2014

_________________________________________
Hon. William H. Orrick
United States District Judge

13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28

STIPULATION AND ORDER RE SCHEDULING OF CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE
72060

6