Fenerjian v. Nong Shim Company, Ltd et al

Filing 170

Order by Magistrate Judge Donna M. Ryu granting 168 Stipulation.(dmrlc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/7/2015)

Download PDF
Case3:13-cv-04115-WHO Document168 Filed05/06/15 Page1 of 4 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Lee Albert Gregory B. Linkh GLANCY PRONGAY & MURRAY LLP 122 East 42nd Street Suite 2920 New York, NY 10168 Telephone: (212) 682-5340 Facsimile: (212) 884-0988 E-Mail: lalbert@glancylaw.com E-Mail: glinkh@glancylaw.com Attorneys for Plaintiff The Plaza Company (Additional Counsel Listed on Signature Page) 8 9 10 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 11 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 12 13 14 IN RE KOREAN RAMEN ANTITRUST LITIGATION, 15 16 STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER THIS DOCUMENT RELATES TO: 17 Case No. 3:13-cv-04115-WHO-DMR All Actions 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 WHEREAS, the Court has issued a Confidentiality Protective Order on March 24, 2015 (Dkt No. 161) pursuant to the parties’ Stipulation; WHEREAS, Plaintiffs have served on Defendants and on non-parties, and Defendants may serve on Plaintiffs (therefore including their co-counsel in Korea) and on non-parties, various Requests for the Production of Documents and other discovery demands that concern documents located in the Republic of Korea; WHEREAS, Korea’s Personal Information Protection Act (“PIPA”) and related statutes including pertinent sections of the Korean Criminal Code (collectively, the “Data Privacy Laws”) protect against the disclosure of certain personal information; 28 1 STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER CASE NO. 3:13-CV-04115-WHO-DMR Case3:13-cv-04115-WHO Document168 Filed05/06/15 Page2 of 4 1 WHEREAS, Article 2, Section 1 of PIPA defines “personal information” as “information 2 pertaining to any living person that makes it possible to identify such individual by his/her name 3 and resident registration number, image, etc.”; 4 WHEREAS, Article 15, Section 2, PIPA, in combination with Article 20, Korean Criminal 5 Code and the decision of the Korean Supreme Court, 2007Do6243; issued December 25, 6 2009), allows collection and use of such information “[w]here special provisions exist in laws or it 7 is unavoidable so as to observe legal obligations” and where a party incurs the risk of Court ordered 8 sanctions if it fails to comply with a Court Order specifying the production of documents or other 9 information located in Korea and covered by the Data Privacy Laws; 10 11 WHEREAS, the parties agree that certain information subject to the Data Privacy Laws may be relevant to the subject matter of this litigation; 12 WHEREAS, the parties desire to resolve issues and concerns relative to compliance with the 13 Data Privacy Laws by this Stipulation and Order, but do not by this stipulation intend to address or 14 resolve any other objection any party or non-party may have to producing information sought in 15 this litigation, all such objections being expressly preserved; 16 17 NOW THEREFORE, it is hereby STIPULATED, by and between the undersigned counsel for the parties, subject to Order of the Court, as follows: 18 To the extent that any party or non-party produces information to any party in this litigation 19 and such information is covered by the Data Privacy Laws, this Court Orders that such information 20 be produced subject to the Stipulated Confidentiality Protective Order (Dkt. No. 161) on file in this 21 litigation. 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 DATED: May 6, 2015 /s/ Lee Albert Lee Albert GLANCY PRONGAY & MURRAY LLP Christopher L. Lebsock HAUSFELD LLP Interim Lead Counsel for the Direct Purchaser Plaintiffs 2 STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER CASE NO. 3:13-CV-04115-WHO-DMR Case3:13-cv-04115-WHO Document168 Filed05/06/15 Page3 of 4 1 2 DATED: May 6, 2015 3 4 /s/ Robert A. Izard Robert A. Izard IZARD NOBEL LLP Interim Lead Counsel for the Indirect Purchaser Plaintiffs 5 6 7 DATED: May 6, 2015 8 9 /s/ Mark C. Dosker Mark C. Dosker SQUIRE PATTON BOGGS (US) LLP Attorneys for Defendants Nongshim Co. Ltd. and Nongshim America, Inc. 10 11 12 13 DATED: May 6, 2015 14 /s/ Joel S. Sanders Joel S. Sanders GIBSON, DUNN & CRUTCHER LLP Attorneys for Defendants Ottogi Co. Ltd. and Ottogi America, Inc. 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 DATED: May 6, 2015 /s/ Elizabeth Mann Elizabeth Mann MAYER BROWN LLP Attorneys for Defendant Samyang Foods Co., Ltd. 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 3 STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER CASE NO. 3:13-CV-04115-WHO-DMR Case3:13-cv-04115-WHO Document168 Filed05/06/15 Page4 of 4 1 2 [PROPOSED] ORDER When any party or non-party produces information in this litigation that is covered by the 3 Data Privacy Laws (including but not limited to the production of documents or electronically stored 4 information as those terms are used in Federal Rules of Civil Procedure 5 34(a)(1)(A) and/or 45, responses to Interrogatories and responses to questions posed at a 6 Deposition), this Court Orders, notwithstanding any provision of the Data Privacy Laws to the 7 contrary, that such information be produced to the requesting party for use in this litigation, provided 8 however that any such production shall be subject to the terms of the Stipulated Confidentiality 9 Protective Order (Dkt. No. 161) on file in this litigation. 10 11 12 May 7, 2015 DATED: ________________________ _____________________________________ United States District/Magistrate Judge 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 4 STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER CASE NO. 3:13-CV-04115-WHO-DMR

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?