Fenerjian v. Nong Shim Company, Ltd et al
Filing
170
Order by Magistrate Judge Donna M. Ryu granting 168 Stipulation.(dmrlc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/7/2015)
Case3:13-cv-04115-WHO Document168 Filed05/06/15 Page1 of 4
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
Lee Albert
Gregory B. Linkh
GLANCY PRONGAY & MURRAY LLP
122 East 42nd Street Suite 2920
New York, NY 10168
Telephone: (212) 682-5340
Facsimile: (212) 884-0988
E-Mail: lalbert@glancylaw.com
E-Mail: glinkh@glancylaw.com
Attorneys for Plaintiff The Plaza Company
(Additional Counsel Listed on Signature Page)
8
9
10
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
11
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
12
13
14
IN RE KOREAN RAMEN ANTITRUST
LITIGATION,
15
16
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED]
ORDER
THIS DOCUMENT RELATES TO:
17
Case No. 3:13-cv-04115-WHO-DMR
All Actions
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
WHEREAS, the Court has issued a Confidentiality Protective Order on March 24, 2015 (Dkt
No. 161) pursuant to the parties’ Stipulation;
WHEREAS, Plaintiffs have served on Defendants and on non-parties, and Defendants may
serve on Plaintiffs (therefore including their co-counsel in Korea) and on non-parties, various
Requests for the Production of Documents and other discovery demands that concern documents
located in the Republic of Korea;
WHEREAS, Korea’s Personal Information Protection Act (“PIPA”) and related statutes
including pertinent sections of the Korean Criminal Code (collectively, the “Data Privacy Laws”)
protect against the disclosure of certain personal information;
28
1
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER
CASE NO. 3:13-CV-04115-WHO-DMR
Case3:13-cv-04115-WHO Document168 Filed05/06/15 Page2 of 4
1
WHEREAS, Article 2, Section 1 of PIPA defines “personal information” as “information
2
pertaining to any living person that makes it possible to identify such individual by his/her name
3
and resident registration number, image, etc.”;
4
WHEREAS, Article 15, Section 2, PIPA, in combination with Article 20, Korean Criminal
5
Code and the decision of the Korean Supreme Court, 2007Do6243; issued December 25,
6
2009), allows collection and use of such information “[w]here special provisions exist in laws or it
7
is unavoidable so as to observe legal obligations” and where a party incurs the risk of Court ordered
8
sanctions if it fails to comply with a Court Order specifying the production of documents or other
9
information located in Korea and covered by the Data Privacy Laws;
10
11
WHEREAS, the parties agree that certain information subject to the Data Privacy Laws may
be relevant to the subject matter of this litigation;
12
WHEREAS, the parties desire to resolve issues and concerns relative to compliance with the
13
Data Privacy Laws by this Stipulation and Order, but do not by this stipulation intend to address or
14
resolve any other objection any party or non-party may have to producing information sought in
15
this litigation, all such objections being expressly preserved;
16
17
NOW THEREFORE, it is hereby STIPULATED, by and between the undersigned counsel
for the parties, subject to Order of the Court, as follows:
18
To the extent that any party or non-party produces information to any party in this litigation
19
and such information is covered by the Data Privacy Laws, this Court Orders that such information
20
be produced subject to the Stipulated Confidentiality Protective Order (Dkt. No. 161) on file in this
21
litigation.
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
DATED: May 6, 2015
/s/ Lee Albert
Lee Albert
GLANCY PRONGAY & MURRAY LLP
Christopher L. Lebsock
HAUSFELD LLP
Interim Lead Counsel for the Direct Purchaser
Plaintiffs
2
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER
CASE NO. 3:13-CV-04115-WHO-DMR
Case3:13-cv-04115-WHO Document168 Filed05/06/15 Page3 of 4
1
2
DATED: May 6, 2015
3
4
/s/ Robert A. Izard
Robert A. Izard
IZARD NOBEL LLP
Interim Lead Counsel for the Indirect Purchaser
Plaintiffs
5
6
7
DATED: May 6, 2015
8
9
/s/ Mark C. Dosker
Mark C. Dosker
SQUIRE PATTON BOGGS (US) LLP
Attorneys for Defendants
Nongshim Co. Ltd. and Nongshim America, Inc.
10
11
12
13
DATED: May 6, 2015
14
/s/ Joel S. Sanders
Joel S. Sanders
GIBSON, DUNN & CRUTCHER LLP
Attorneys for Defendants
Ottogi Co. Ltd. and Ottogi America, Inc.
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
DATED: May 6, 2015
/s/ Elizabeth Mann
Elizabeth Mann
MAYER BROWN LLP
Attorneys for Defendant
Samyang Foods Co., Ltd.
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
3
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER
CASE NO. 3:13-CV-04115-WHO-DMR
Case3:13-cv-04115-WHO Document168 Filed05/06/15 Page4 of 4
1
2
[PROPOSED] ORDER
When any party or non-party produces information in this litigation that is covered by the
3
Data Privacy Laws (including but not limited to the production of documents or electronically stored
4
information as those terms are used in Federal Rules of Civil Procedure
5
34(a)(1)(A) and/or 45, responses to Interrogatories and responses to questions posed at a
6
Deposition), this Court Orders, notwithstanding any provision of the Data Privacy Laws to the
7
contrary, that such information be produced to the requesting party for use in this litigation, provided
8
however that any such production shall be subject to the terms of the Stipulated Confidentiality
9
Protective Order (Dkt. No. 161) on file in this litigation.
10
11
12
May 7, 2015
DATED: ________________________
_____________________________________
United States District/Magistrate Judge
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
4
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER
CASE NO. 3:13-CV-04115-WHO-DMR
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?