Fenerjian v. Nong Shim Company, Ltd et al

Filing 386

Order by Magistrate Judge Donna M. Ryu granting 384 Administrative Motion to File Under Seal.(dmrlc3, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/27/2016)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 7 STEPHEN FENERJIAN, et al., Case No. 13-cv-04115-WHO (DMR) Plaintiffs, 8 v. ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO FILE UNDER SEAL 9 10 NONG SHIM COMPANY, LTD, et al., Re: Dkt. No. 384 Defendants. United States District Court Northern District of California 11 12 On July 22, 2016, the Direct Purchaser Plaintiffs (“DPPs”) filed a motion to file under seal 13 information from two documents accompanying their Notice of Receipt of Documents from 14 Korean Judicial Authorities Permitting the Examination of Two Former Samyang Korea 15 Employees Pursuant to Submitted Letters Rogatory. Mot. to File Under Seal [Docket No. 384]. 16 Specifically, the DPPs move to seal information in the Notice of Hearing issued by the Anyang 17 Branch of the Suwon District Court and the Notice issued by the Seoul Southern District Court. 18 On July 26, 2016, Defendant Samyang Foods Co., Ltd.’s counsel filed a declaration 19 supporting the sealing of the information to protect the identity of witnesses and certain 20 information on the basis that Samyang Korea is a direct competitor in Korea with the other 21 Defendants in the ramen market and that some of the information sought to be sealed involves 22 Samyang’s confidential business practices. Mann Declaration [Docket No. 385]. Samyang also 23 declares that it was the leniency applicant before the Korean Fair Trade Commission (“KFTC”), 24 but fails to tie the designated information to be sealed to any information provided to the KFTC in 25 confidence as part of Samyang’s leniency application. The Mann declaration merely states that 26 “Samyang was the leniency applicant before the Korean Fair Trade Commission when it 27 investigated the question of whether Korean ramen manufacturers were engaged in a conspiracy in 28 Korea to fix the prices of Korean ramen noodles. The information in the Notices addresses the 1 Korean price fixing conspiracy in Korea. Samyang maintains its urgent desire to have such 2 testimony/documents treated as confidential and thus filed under seal.” Mann Decl. at ¶ 5. 3 Samyang’s declaration does not clearly tie the information sought to be sealed to information 4 provided by Samyang in confidence to the KFTC or otherwise explain why the designated 5 material should be filed under seal. Not all information related to the alleged Korean price-fixing 6 conspiracy in Korea is appropriate for sealing. Samyang is reminded that if it wishes to have such 7 information filed under seal it must file a declaration as required by Civil Local Rule 79- 8 5(d)(1)(A) establishing that all of the designated material is sealable. Civil L.R. 79-5(e)(1). 9 However, the court has reviewed the information sought to be sealed and finds that the identity of the witnesses and details in the questions appear related to material that the undersigned 11 United States District Court Northern District of California 10 has previously reviewed regarding information provided to the KFTC in conjunction with its 12 investigation of alleged price-fixing of Korean ramen noodles. See Mann Declaration [Docket 13 No. 243] (establishing basis for sealing names of former Samyang employees who gave sworn 14 statements to the KFTC and information produced by Samyang related to its leniency application, 15 and KFTC’s agreement to Samyang producing the material in the present litigation on designation 16 of all such material as “highly confidential); Order Granting Motion to Seal [Docket No. 285] at 2 17 (finding good cause to grant motion to file under seal identities of witnesses and substance of their 18 statements provided to KFTC). 19 20 The court finds that good cause exists for sealing the designated information and grants the DPPs’ motion to file under seal [Docket No. 384]. 21 22 23 24 25 IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: July 27, 2016 ______________________________________ Donna M. Ryu United States Magistrate Judge 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?