Fenerjian v. Nong Shim Company, Ltd et al
Filing
386
Order by Magistrate Judge Donna M. Ryu granting 384 Administrative Motion to File Under Seal.(dmrlc3, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/27/2016)
1
2
3
4
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
5
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
6
7
STEPHEN FENERJIAN, et al.,
Case No. 13-cv-04115-WHO (DMR)
Plaintiffs,
8
v.
ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO FILE
UNDER SEAL
9
10
NONG SHIM COMPANY, LTD, et al.,
Re: Dkt. No. 384
Defendants.
United States District Court
Northern District of California
11
12
On July 22, 2016, the Direct Purchaser Plaintiffs (“DPPs”) filed a motion to file under seal
13
information from two documents accompanying their Notice of Receipt of Documents from
14
Korean Judicial Authorities Permitting the Examination of Two Former Samyang Korea
15
Employees Pursuant to Submitted Letters Rogatory. Mot. to File Under Seal [Docket No. 384].
16
Specifically, the DPPs move to seal information in the Notice of Hearing issued by the Anyang
17
Branch of the Suwon District Court and the Notice issued by the Seoul Southern District Court.
18
On July 26, 2016, Defendant Samyang Foods Co., Ltd.’s counsel filed a declaration
19
supporting the sealing of the information to protect the identity of witnesses and certain
20
information on the basis that Samyang Korea is a direct competitor in Korea with the other
21
Defendants in the ramen market and that some of the information sought to be sealed involves
22
Samyang’s confidential business practices. Mann Declaration [Docket No. 385]. Samyang also
23
declares that it was the leniency applicant before the Korean Fair Trade Commission (“KFTC”),
24
but fails to tie the designated information to be sealed to any information provided to the KFTC in
25
confidence as part of Samyang’s leniency application. The Mann declaration merely states that
26
“Samyang was the leniency applicant before the Korean Fair Trade Commission when it
27
investigated the question of whether Korean ramen manufacturers were engaged in a conspiracy in
28
Korea to fix the prices of Korean ramen noodles. The information in the Notices addresses the
1
Korean price fixing conspiracy in Korea. Samyang maintains its urgent desire to have such
2
testimony/documents treated as confidential and thus filed under seal.” Mann Decl. at ¶ 5.
3
Samyang’s declaration does not clearly tie the information sought to be sealed to information
4
provided by Samyang in confidence to the KFTC or otherwise explain why the designated
5
material should be filed under seal. Not all information related to the alleged Korean price-fixing
6
conspiracy in Korea is appropriate for sealing. Samyang is reminded that if it wishes to have such
7
information filed under seal it must file a declaration as required by Civil Local Rule 79-
8
5(d)(1)(A) establishing that all of the designated material is sealable. Civil L.R. 79-5(e)(1).
9
However, the court has reviewed the information sought to be sealed and finds that the
identity of the witnesses and details in the questions appear related to material that the undersigned
11
United States District Court
Northern District of California
10
has previously reviewed regarding information provided to the KFTC in conjunction with its
12
investigation of alleged price-fixing of Korean ramen noodles. See Mann Declaration [Docket
13
No. 243] (establishing basis for sealing names of former Samyang employees who gave sworn
14
statements to the KFTC and information produced by Samyang related to its leniency application,
15
and KFTC’s agreement to Samyang producing the material in the present litigation on designation
16
of all such material as “highly confidential); Order Granting Motion to Seal [Docket No. 285] at 2
17
(finding good cause to grant motion to file under seal identities of witnesses and substance of their
18
statements provided to KFTC).
19
20
The court finds that good cause exists for sealing the designated information and grants the
DPPs’ motion to file under seal [Docket No. 384].
21
22
23
24
25
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated: July 27, 2016
______________________________________
Donna M. Ryu
United States Magistrate Judge
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?