McNaboe v. Safeway Incorporated et al

Filing 54

ORDER RE: FURTHER CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE (Illston, Susan) (Filed on 10/8/2015)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 7 LAURA MCNABOE, Case No. 13-cv-04174-SI Plaintiff, 8 v. ORDER RE: FURTHER CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE 9 10 SAFEWAY INC., et al., Re: Dkt. No. 51 Defendants. United States District Court Northern District of California 11 12 13 The parties last appeared before the Court on May 8, 2015 for a case management 14 conference. At that time the Court continued the CMC to October 9, 2015 to permit the parties to 15 continue to work with Arbitrator Paul Staudohar to resolve issues related to the application of 16 Arbitrator Staudohar’s March 4, 2015 Opinion and Decision, awarding plaintiff: 17 1. One year of back pay; 18 2. Health and welfare and seniority benefits for the full period up to July 7, 2014; 19 3. Out-of-pocket medical and dental expenses; and 20 4. Interest 21 of seven percent on monies owed by the Employer. Additionally, Arbitrator Staudohar ordered that: 22 1. Outside earnings of approximately $3,200.00 be deducted from back pay; and 23 2. Unemployment benefits paid to plaintiff be deducted from back pay. 24 The parties’ case management statements to this Court reveal that little progress has been 25 made in implementing Arbitrator Staudohar’s Opinion and Decision. 26 In an effort to assist the parties in concluding this protracted dispute over the remedy in 27 plaintiff’s case, the Court informed the parties that in-person appearance would be required for the 28 October 9, 2015 CMC. Evidently counsel for Safeway is unable to appear in person on October 9, 1 2 3 2015. The Court therefore orders the parties to appear in person for a Further Case Management Conference set for 10/15/2015 10:30 a.m. in Courtroom 10, 19th Floor, San Francisco. 4 At the CMC, the parties shall be prepared to discuss, among other issues, the following: 5 1. 6 7 8 9 Has Safeway inquired of the State’s unemployment office to secure the details of the start and end dates and total amount of cash benefits paid to plaintiff? If not, why? 2. Has Safeway credited plaintiff’s health and welfare account with contributions and credit for hours worked? If not, why? 3. What was the outcome of the arbitrator’s March 16, 2015 order clarifying that he intended to include pension benefits in his award on March 4, 2015, wherein he awarded plaintiff 11 United States District Court Northern District of California 10 “[h]ealth and welfare and seniority benefits . . . for the full period up to July 7, 2014.” If this has 12 not been acted upon, why not? 13 14 15 4. What other documents, if any, has Union neglected to provide Safeway? If these documents have not been provided to Safeway, why not? 5. Plaintiff claims that she cannot return to work due to a medical condition. Safeway 16 claims that it has not been provided with a doctor’s note or medical certification supporting this 17 claim. Is this accurate? If so, why has this documentation not been provided? 18 19 20 21 22 IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: October 8, 2015 ______________________________________ SUSAN ILLSTON United States District Judge 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?