Board of Trustees of the Sheet Metal Workers Local 104 Health Care Trust et al v. Jet Mechanical, Inc.

Filing 32

ORDER re 31 MOTION to Continue Plaintiffs' Request for Continuance of Case Management Conference; and [Proposed] Order Thereon filed by Sheet Metal Workers Local 104 Supplemental Pension Fund, Sheet Metal Workers Local 104 An d Bay Area Industry Training Fund, Board of Trustees of the Sheet Metal Workers Local 104 Health Care Trust, Sheet Metal Workers Pension Trust of Northern California, Sheet Metal Workers Local 104 Vacation-Holiday Savings Fund, Bruce Word Case Management Statement due by 11/13/2014. Further Case Management Conference set for 11/20/2014 10:30 AM in Courtroom 5, 17th Floor, San Francisco.. Signed by Judge Edward M. Chen on 9/8/14. (bpf, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/8/2014)

Download PDF
1 Michele R. Stafford, Esq. (SBN 172509) Shivani Nanda, Esq. (SBN 253891) 2 SALTZMAN & JOHNSON LAW CORPORATION 44 Montgomery Street, Suite 2110 3 San Francisco, CA 94104 (415) 882-7900 4 (415) 882-9287 – Facsimile mstafford@sjlawcorp.com 5 snanda@sjlawcorp.com 6 Attorneys for Plaintiffs 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 BOARDS OF TRUSTEES OF THE SHEET METAL WORKERS LOCAL 104 HEALTH 11 CARE TRUST, et al., 12 Plaintiffs, 13 Case No.: C13-4194 EMC PLAINTIFFS’ REQUEST FOR CONTINUANCE OF CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE; and [PROPOSED] ORDER THEREON v. 14 JET MECHANICAL, INC., a California corporation, 15 Defendant. 16 Date: September 11, 2014 Time: 10:30 a.m. Ctrm: Courtroom 5, 17th Floor 450 Golden Gate Avenue San Francisco, California Judge: The Honorable Edward M. Chen 17 Plaintiffs respectfully request that the Case Management Conference scheduled for 18 19 September 11, 2014, at 10:30 a.m., be continued for approximately sixty (60) days, as follows: 1. 20 As the Court’s records will reflect, this action was filed on September 10, 2013 to 21 compel Defendant to comply with the terms of its Collective Bargaining Agreement. 2. 22 Defendant was served with the summons and complaint on December 30, 2013, 23 and Plaintiffs filed a Proof of Service of Summons on January 7, 2014. 3. 24 On January 16, 2014, Plaintiffs requested a continuance to the Case Management 25 Conference to allow for sufficient time for Defendant to respond to Plaintiffs’ complaint. On 26 January 21, 2014, the Court granted Plaintiffs’ request and the Case Management Conference was 27 rescheduled for February 27, 2014. 28 / / / P:\CLIENTS\SHECL\Jet Mechanical\Pleadings\Request to Continue CMC 090314.docx -1REQUEST TO CONTINUE CMC Case No.: C13-4194 EMC 1 4. Defendant retained counsel and submitted its delinquent contribution reports. On 2 February 20, 2014, Plaintiffs requested another continuance to the Case Management Conference 3 because the parties were working toward resolution of the dispute through a payment plan in the 4 form of a Judgment Pursuant to Stipulation. On February 25, 2014, the Court granted Plaintiffs’ 5 request and the Case Management Conference was rescheduled for April 10, 2014. 6 5. On March 10, 2014, the Court filed a notice rescheduling the Case Management 7 Conference to April 15, 2014. 8 6. On March 26, 2014, Plaintiffs filed a Request for Entry of Default as Defendant 9 failed to plead or otherwise defend or appear in this action, and the time permitted for such 10 pleading, defense, or other appearance has run. 11 7. On April 7, 2014, Plaintiffs requested a continuance of the Case Management 12 Conference to allow sufficient time for parties to discuss the terms of a payment plan. On April 13 11, 2014, the Court granted Plaintiffs’ request and the Case Management Conference was 14 rescheduled for June 19, 2014. 15 8. On April 8, 2014, the Court issued an order denying Plaintiffs’ request for entry of 16 Defendant’s default. 17 9. On June 12, 2014, Plaintiffs requested a continuance of the Case Management 18 Conference to allow sufficient time for Plaintiffs to prepare, and Defendant to review and execute, 19 a Judgment Pursuant to Stipulation. On June 13, 2014, the Court granted Plaintiffs’ request and 20 the Case Management Conference was rescheduled for September 11, 2014. 21 10. Defendant failed to execute the Judgment Pursuant to Stipulation prepared by 22 Plaintiffs. Defendant currently owes Plaintiffs payment for its July 2014 contributions, as well as 23 interest, liquidated damages, and attorneys’ fees and costs. Defendant has contacted Plaintiffs and 24 indicated that it will pay its July 2014 contributions, and amounts due in interest and attorneys’ 25 fees and costs, and will request a waiver of its liquidated damages, to be considered by Plaintiffs’ 26 Trust Funds’ Board of Trustees. 27 11. There are no issues that need to be addressed by this Court at the currently 28 scheduled Case Management Conference. In the interest of conserving costs as well as the Court’s -2REQUEST TO CONTINUE CMC Case No.: C13-4194 EMC P:\CLIENTS\SHECL\Jet Mechanical\Pleadings\Request to Continue CMC 090314.docx 1 time and resources, Plaintiffs respectfully request that the Court continue the currently scheduled 2 Case Management Conference for approximately sixty (60) days, to allow for sufficient time for 3 Defendant to submit payment for its delinquent contributions, interest, and attorneys’ fees and 4 costs, as well as a written request for a waiver of liquidated damages due. 5 12. Plaintiffs recognize that a case management conference statement is due seven days 6 in advance of the case management conference date, pursuant to Local Rule 16-9. Should this 7 Court require Plaintiffs to file a complete Case Management Conference Statement, Plaintiffs will 8 do so promptly. 9 10 Dated: September 3, 2014 11 SALTZMAN & JOHNSON LAW CORPORATION By: /S/ Michele R. Stafford Attorneys for Plaintiffs 12 13 NO 21 RT 22 24 . Chen ward M udge Ed J ER H 23 R NIA 20 RDE IS SO O FIED IT DI AS MO FO 19 RT U O 18 LI 17 A 16 Based on the foregoing, and GOOD CAUSE APPEARING, the currently set Case 11/20/14 Management Conference is hereby continued to _______________, and all related deadlines are extended accordingly. 9/8/14 S DISTRICT Date: ____________________ TE C _________________________________________ TA THE HONORABLE EDWARD M. CHEN UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT RED S 15 IT IS SO ORDERED. UNIT ED 14 N F D IS T IC T O R C 25 26 27 28 -3REQUEST TO CONTINUE CMC Case No.: C13-4194 EMC P:\CLIENTS\SHECL\Jet Mechanical\Pleadings\Request to Continue CMC 090314.docx 1 PROOF OF SERVICE 2 I, the undersigned, declare: 3 1. I am a citizen of the United States and am employed in the County of San 4 Francisco, State of California. My business address is 44 Montgomery Street, Suite 2110, San 5 Francisco, California 94104. 6 2. I am over the age of eighteen and not a party to this action. 7 3. On September 4, 2014, I served the following document(s): 8 PLAINTIFFS’ REQUEST FOR CONTINUANCE OF CASE MANAGEMENT 9 CONFERENCE; and [PROPOSED] ORDER THEREON 10 on the interested parties in said action by enclosing a true and exact copy of each document in a 11 sealed envelope and placing the envelope for collection and First Class mailing following our 12 ordinary business practices. I am readily familiar with this business’ practice for collecting and 13 processing correspondence for mailing. On the same day that correspondence is placed for 14 collection and mailing, it is deposited in the ordinary course of business with the United States 15 Postal Service in a sealed envelope with postage fully prepaid. 16 17 18 19 20 4. The envelopes were addressed and mailed as follows: Jet Mechanical, Inc. c/o David Dornblaser, Esq. Law Offices of David Dornblaser 3758 Spinnaker Ct. Fremont, CA 94538 I declare under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct and that this 21 declaration was executed on September 4, 2014, at San Francisco, California. 22 /S/ Alicia Rutkowski Paralegal 23 24 25 26 27 28 -4REQUEST TO CONTINUE CMC Case No.: C13-4194 EMC P:\CLIENTS\SHECL\Jet Mechanical\Pleadings\Request to Continue CMC 090314.docx

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?