Nelson v. Hartford Life Insurance Company

Filing 93

ORDER OF DISMISSAL, granting 92 STIPULATION WITH PROPOSED ORDER RE DISMISSAL filed by City Of Oakland. Signed by Judge Charles R. Breyer on 7/6/2015. (beS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/6/2015)

Download PDF
1 Emilie E. de la Motte (SBN: 233557) edelamotte@meyersnave.com 2 MEYERS, NAVE, RIBACK, SILVER & WILSON 555 12th Street, Suite 1500 3 Oakland, California 94607 Telephone: (510) 808-2000 4 Facsimile: (510) 444-1108 5 Attorneys for Third-Party Defendant/CrossClaimant CITY OF OAKLAND 6 EXEMPT FROM FILING FEES GOV’T CODE § 6103 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION 10 DESSIE R. NELSON, Case No. 13-CV-04196-CRB 11 STIPULATED REQUEST FOR DISMISSAL; ORDER OF DISMISSAL 12 Plaintiff, v. 13 THE HARTFORD, and DOES 1 through 10, Inclusive, 14 Defendants. 15 HARTFORD LIFE INSURANCE 16 COMPANY, 17 18 Trial Date: None Set Third-Party Plaintiff, v. 19 JULIANA JAMES, as Administrator of the Estate of Clarence James, CITY OF 20 OAKLAND, and ROES 1 through 50, Inclusive, 21 Third-Party Defendants. 22 CITY OF OAKLAND, 23 Cross-Claimant, 24 v. 25 JULIANA JAMES, as Administrator of the 26 Estate of Clarence James, and MOES 1 through 10, Inclusive, 27 Cross-Defendants. 28 13-CV-04196-CRB STIPULATED REQUEST FOR DISMISSAL AND ORDER OF DISMISSAL 1 COMES NOW Plaintiff Dessie Nelson, Defendant and Third-Party 2 Complainant Hartford Life Insurance Company (erroneously sued as “The 3 Hartford”), Third-Party Defendant and Cross-Claimant City of Oakland, and Third4 Party Defendant and Cross Defendant Juliana James (collectively, “the Parties”), by 5 and through their respective attorneys of record, and hereby give notice and stipulate 6 as follows: 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 1. The Parties have reached a collective settlement on all issues raised in this matter. This includes all issues raised through Plaintiff Dessie Nelson’s complaint, Hartford Life Insurance Company’s Third-Party Complaint, and City of Oakland’s Cross-Complaint. 2. The Parties seek to dismiss all claims presented the Complaint, Third- Party Complaint, and Cross-Complaint with prejudice pursuant to the terms of the respective settlement agreements, as more fully set forth within the Settlement Agreements and Releases executed by and between the Parties. IT IS SO STIPULATED. Dated: July 1, 2015 16 17 THE UKOHA-AJIKE LAW GROUP PC HINSHAW & CULBERTSON LLP 18 By: /s/ Endy Ukoha-Ajike ENDY UKOHA-AJIKE Attorneys for Plaintiff 20 Dessie R. Nelson By: /s/ James A. Hazlehurst MARTIN E. ROSEN JAMES A. HAZLEHURST Attorneys for Defendant Hartford Life Insurance Company 19 21 22 MOORE & MOORE MEYERS NAVE LLP 23 By: /s/ Howard Moore, Jr. 24 25 By: /s/ Emilie de la Motte EMILIE E. DE LA MOTTE Attorneys for Third Party Defendant City of Oakland HOWARD MOORE, JR. Attorney for Third Party Defendant Juliana James 26 27 28 1 STIPULATED REQUEST FOR DISMISSAL AND ORDER OF DISMISSAL 13-CV-04196-CRB 1 2 ORDER The parties submitted a joint stipulation, appearing above, which showed the 3 parties have resolved the issues raised in this lawsuit. Having read and considered 4 the stipulation by the Parties, IT IS ORDERED THAT: 5 The lawsuit of Dessie Nelson v. The Hartford in the Northern District of 6 California, Case No. 13-CV-04196-CRB, including all associated cross-claims, is 7 hereby DISMISSED with prejudice in its entirety. Each party to bear its own costs. 8 IT IS SO ORDERED. 9 DATED: July 6, 2015 10 By: The Honorable Charles R. Breyer Senior District Court Judge 11 12 13 14 2393202.1 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2 STIPULATED REQUEST FOR DISMISSAL AND ORDER OF DISMISSAL 13-CV-04196-CRB

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?