Nelson v. Hartford Life Insurance Company
Filing
93
ORDER OF DISMISSAL, granting 92 STIPULATION WITH PROPOSED ORDER RE DISMISSAL filed by City Of Oakland. Signed by Judge Charles R. Breyer on 7/6/2015. (beS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/6/2015)
1 Emilie E. de la Motte (SBN: 233557)
edelamotte@meyersnave.com
2 MEYERS, NAVE, RIBACK, SILVER & WILSON
555 12th Street, Suite 1500
3 Oakland, California 94607
Telephone: (510) 808-2000
4 Facsimile: (510) 444-1108
5 Attorneys for Third-Party Defendant/CrossClaimant CITY OF OAKLAND
6
EXEMPT FROM FILING FEES
GOV’T CODE § 6103
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION
10 DESSIE R. NELSON,
Case No. 13-CV-04196-CRB
11
STIPULATED REQUEST FOR
DISMISSAL; ORDER OF
DISMISSAL
12
Plaintiff,
v.
13 THE HARTFORD, and DOES 1 through 10,
Inclusive,
14
Defendants.
15
HARTFORD LIFE INSURANCE
16 COMPANY,
17
18
Trial Date:
None Set
Third-Party Plaintiff,
v.
19 JULIANA JAMES, as Administrator of the
Estate of Clarence James, CITY OF
20 OAKLAND, and ROES 1 through 50,
Inclusive,
21
Third-Party Defendants.
22
CITY OF OAKLAND,
23
Cross-Claimant,
24
v.
25
JULIANA JAMES, as Administrator of the
26 Estate of Clarence James, and MOES 1
through 10, Inclusive,
27
Cross-Defendants.
28
13-CV-04196-CRB
STIPULATED REQUEST FOR DISMISSAL AND ORDER OF DISMISSAL
1
COMES NOW Plaintiff Dessie Nelson, Defendant and Third-Party
2 Complainant Hartford Life Insurance Company (erroneously sued as “The
3 Hartford”), Third-Party Defendant and Cross-Claimant City of Oakland, and Third4 Party Defendant and Cross Defendant Juliana James (collectively, “the Parties”), by
5 and through their respective attorneys of record, and hereby give notice and stipulate
6 as follows:
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
1.
The Parties have reached a collective settlement on all issues raised in
this matter. This includes all issues raised through Plaintiff Dessie Nelson’s
complaint, Hartford Life Insurance Company’s Third-Party Complaint, and City of
Oakland’s Cross-Complaint.
2.
The Parties seek to dismiss all claims presented the Complaint, Third-
Party Complaint, and Cross-Complaint with prejudice pursuant to the terms of the
respective settlement agreements, as more fully set forth within the Settlement
Agreements and Releases executed by and between the Parties.
IT IS SO STIPULATED.
Dated: July 1, 2015
16
17 THE UKOHA-AJIKE LAW GROUP PC
HINSHAW & CULBERTSON LLP
18
By: /s/ Endy Ukoha-Ajike
ENDY UKOHA-AJIKE
Attorneys for Plaintiff
20
Dessie R. Nelson
By: /s/ James A. Hazlehurst
MARTIN E. ROSEN
JAMES A. HAZLEHURST
Attorneys for Defendant Hartford
Life Insurance Company
19
21
22
MOORE & MOORE
MEYERS NAVE LLP
23 By: /s/ Howard Moore, Jr.
24
25
By: /s/ Emilie de la Motte
EMILIE E. DE LA MOTTE
Attorneys for Third Party
Defendant City of Oakland
HOWARD MOORE, JR.
Attorney for Third Party Defendant
Juliana James
26
27
28
1
STIPULATED REQUEST FOR DISMISSAL AND ORDER OF DISMISSAL
13-CV-04196-CRB
1
2
ORDER
The parties submitted a joint stipulation, appearing above, which showed the
3 parties have resolved the issues raised in this lawsuit. Having read and considered
4 the stipulation by the Parties, IT IS ORDERED THAT:
5
The lawsuit of Dessie Nelson v. The Hartford in the Northern District of
6 California, Case No. 13-CV-04196-CRB, including all associated cross-claims, is
7 hereby DISMISSED with prejudice in its entirety. Each party to bear its own costs.
8
IT IS SO ORDERED.
9
DATED: July 6, 2015
10
By:
The Honorable Charles R. Breyer
Senior District Court Judge
11
12
13
14
2393202.1
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
STIPULATED REQUEST FOR DISMISSAL AND ORDER OF DISMISSAL
13-CV-04196-CRB
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?