Apolinario v. United Healthcare Workers-West Service Employees International Union, CTW, CLC et al
Filing
23
ORDER VACATING MOTION HEARING re 12 MOTION to Dismiss First Amended Complaint filed by United Healthcare Workers-West Service Employees International Union, CTW, CLC. Signed by Judge Jon S. Tigar on January 9, 2014. (wsn, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/9/2014)
1
2
3
4
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
5
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
6
7
RICARDO APOLINARIO,
Case No. 13-cv-04219-JST
Plaintiff,
8
v.
ORDER VACATING MOTION
HEARING
9
10
United States District Court
Northern District of California
11
UNITED HEALTHCARE WORKERSWEST SERVICE EMPLOYEES
INTERNATIONAL UNION, CTW, CLC, et
al.,
Defendants.
12
13
Re: ECF No. 12
Before the Court is United Healthcare Workers-West Service Employees International
14
Union, CTW, CLC's Motion to Dismiss the First Amended Complaint. ECF No. 12. Pursuant to
15
Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 78(b) and Civil Local Rule 7-1(b), the Court finds that the parties’
16
briefs have thoroughly addressed the issues, rendering the matter suitable for disposition without
17
oral argument. The hearing on this matter, currently scheduled for January 16, 2014, is hereby
18
VACATED.
19
However, if any party advises the Court in writing by no later than two days from the date
20
of this Order that most or all of the argument for its side will be conducted by a lawyer who has
21
been licensed to practice law for four or fewer years, and who has not previously presented
22
argument before this Court, then the Court will reschedule the hearing at a time that is convenient
23
to all parties in order to provide that opportunity. Any such notice should reflect the date or dates
24
on which the parties are available for the hearing.
25
26
27
28
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated: January 9, 2014
______________________________________
JON S. TIGAR
United States District Judge
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?