ServiceNow, Inc. v. Stonebranch, Inc.

Filing 24

STIPULATION AND ORDER TO HAVE PENDING MOTIONS HEARD ON THE SAME DAY. Motion Hearing set for 11/21/2013 01:30 PM in Courtroom 3, 17th Floor, San Francisco before Hon. Richard Seeborg. Signed by Judge Richard Seeborg on 11/4/13. (cl, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/4/2013)

Download PDF
COBLENTZ PATCH DUFFY & BASS LLP One Ferry Building, Suite 200, San Francisco, California 94111-4213 415.391.4800 • Fax 415.989.1663 1 JULIA D. GREER (State Bar No. 200479) LAUREN S. KOWAL (State Bar No. 224976) 2 COBLENTZ PATCH DUFFY & BASS LLP One Ferry Building, Suite 200 3 San Francisco, California 94111-4213 Telephone: 415.391.4800 4 Facsimile: 415.989.1663 Email: ef-jdg@cpdb.com ef-lsk@cpdb.com 5 6 SIMON R. MALKO (pro hac vice pending) MORRIS, MANNING & MARTIN, LLP 7 1600 Atlanta Financial Center 3343 Peachtree Road, NE 8 Atlanta, GA 30326 Telephone: 404.233.7000 9 Facsimile: 404.365.9532 Email: sxm@mmmlaw.com 10 Attorneys for Defendant 11 STONEBRANCH, INC. 12 13 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 14 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 15 SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION 16 17 SERVICENOW, INC., a Delaware Corporation, 18 Plaintiff, 19 v. 20 STONEBRANCH, INC., a Georgia 21 Corporation, and DOES 1-5, Case No. 3:13-cv-04243-RS 22 Case filed: September 12, 2013 Trial Date: None Set Defendants. 23 STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO HAVE PENDING MOTIONS HEARD ON THE SAME DATE Judge: Crtrm.: Hon. Richard Seeborg Three 24 25 26 27 28 15393.001 2644454v1 3:13-cv-04243-RS STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER RE: HEARING DATES 1 Plaintiff ServiceNow, Inc. (“ServiceNow”) and Defendant Stonebranch, Inc. 2 (“Stonebranch”) submit the following Stipulation for the Court’s consideration: 3 WHEREAS, on October 14, 2013, Stonebranch filed a Motion to Dismiss this matter in its 4 entirety for lack of personal jurisdiction (Dkt. No. 16), which will be fully briefed as of November COBLENTZ PATCH DUFFY & BASS LLP One Ferry Building, Suite 200, San Francisco, California 94111-4213 415.391.4800 • Fax 415.989.1663 5 4, 2013; 6 WHEREAS, Stonebranch’s Motion to Dismiss is presently set for hearing before this 7 Court on December 12, 2013; 8 WHEREAS, on October 18, 2013 ServiceNow filed a Motion for Preliminary Injunction in 9 this matter (Dkt. No. 18-3), which will be fully briefed as of November 7, 2013; 10 WHEREAS, ServiceNow’s Motion for Preliminary Injunction is presently set for hearing 11 in this Court on November 21, 2013; 12 WHEREAS, lead trial counsel for Stonebranch is located in Atlanta, Georgia, and must 13 travel to attend the hearings in this case; 14 WHEREAS, the parties agree that the Court should decide the issue of jurisdiction 15 concomitantly or in advance of the question of whether injunctive relief is warranted; 16 WHEREAS, the parties agree that by opposing ServiceNow’s Motion for Preliminary 17 Injunction and submitting this Stipulation, Stonebranch has not and will not waive its arguments 18 with respect to personal jurisdiction; 19 THEREFORE, the parties believe that both Stonebranch’s pending Motion to Dismiss and 20 ServiceNow’s pending Motion for Preliminary Injunction should be heard on the same date, 21 November 21, 2013, or on the first hearing date thereafter acceptable to the Court and the parties. 22 IT IS SO STIPULATED. 23 24 DATED: November 4, 2013 COBLENTZ PATCH DUFFY & BASS LLP 25 26 By: 27 28 15393.001 2644454v1 /s/ Julia D. Greer JULIA D. GREER Attorneys for Defendant STONEBRANCH, INC. 1 STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER RE: HEARING DATES 3:13-cv-04243-RS 1 DATED: November 4, 2013 FENWICK & WEST LLP 2 3 By: 4 COBLENTZ PATCH DUFFY & BASS LLP One Ferry Building, Suite 200, San Francisco, California 94111-4213 415.391.4800 • Fax 415.989.1663 5 /s/ Ilana S. Rubel ILANA S. RUBEL Attorneys for Plaintiff SERVICENOW, INC. 6 7 IT IS SO ORDERED. November 4 8 DATED: _______________, 2013 9 10 Hon. Richard Seeborg United States District Court Judge 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 15393.001 2644454v1 2 STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER RE: HEARING DATES 3:13-cv-04243-RS

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?