Burke et al v. JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. et al
Filing
56
ORDER GRANTING REQUEST TO CONTINUE re 55 STIPULATION WITH PROPOSED ORDER filed by Deborah L. Burke, Sean K. Burke. Case Management Statement due by 8/21/2015. Case Management Conference set for 8/28/2015 10:00 AM in Courtroom 1, 17th Floor, San Francisco. Signed by Judge Samuel Conti on 6/19/15. (dt, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/19/2015).
1
2
3
4
Charles T. Marshall, Esquire (SBN 176091)
Law Offices of Charles T. Marshall
415 Laurel Street, # 405
San Diego, California 92101
Tel: 619-807-2628
Fax: 866-575-7413
Email: cmarshall@marshallestatelaw.com
5
6
Attorneys for Plaintiffs
DEBORAH L. BURKE and
SEAN K. BURKE
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
DEBORAH L. BURKE and
SEAN K. BURKE
)
)
)
)
)
Plaintiffs,
)
)
v.
)
)
JPMORGAN CHASE BANK, N.A.; WELLS )
FARGO BANK, N.A. AS TRUSTEE FOR
)
JPMORGAN MORTGAGE TRUST 2008-R2 )
MORTGAGE PASS-THROUGH
)
CERTIFICATES SERIES 2008-R2
)
)
Defendant(s).
)
)
)
)
//
Case No.: C13-4249 SC
JUDGE:
Samuel Conti
[PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING
STIPULATED REQUEST FOR ORDER
CONTINUING CASE MANAGEMENT
CONFERENCE PURSUANT TO CIVIL
LOCAL RULE 6-2
Complaint filed: September 13, 2013
//
24
//
25
//
26
//
27
28
//
//
Burke v. JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A., et al.
[Proposed] Order Granting Stipulated Request
1
1
2
3
Stipulated Request for Order continuing Case Management
Conference Pursuant to Civil Local Rule 6-2 and accompanying Declaration of Good Cause,
PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED.
4
5
6
Case Management Conference is continued to August 28, 2015 at
10:00 am. Parties shall file a joint case management statement
no later than August 21, 2015.
7
8
19
Dated: June ___, 2015
______________________________
United States District Judge
Burke v. JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A., et al.
[Proposed] Order Granting Stipulated Request
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?