Burke et al v. JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. et al

Filing 56

ORDER GRANTING REQUEST TO CONTINUE re 55 STIPULATION WITH PROPOSED ORDER filed by Deborah L. Burke, Sean K. Burke. Case Management Statement due by 8/21/2015. Case Management Conference set for 8/28/2015 10:00 AM in Courtroom 1, 17th Floor, San Francisco. Signed by Judge Samuel Conti on 6/19/15. (dt, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/19/2015).

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 Charles T. Marshall, Esquire (SBN 176091) Law Offices of Charles T. Marshall 415 Laurel Street, # 405 San Diego, California 92101 Tel: 619-807-2628 Fax: 866-575-7413 Email: cmarshall@marshallestatelaw.com 5 6 Attorneys for Plaintiffs DEBORAH L. BURKE and SEAN K. BURKE 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 DEBORAH L. BURKE and SEAN K. BURKE ) ) ) ) ) Plaintiffs, ) ) v. ) ) JPMORGAN CHASE BANK, N.A.; WELLS ) FARGO BANK, N.A. AS TRUSTEE FOR ) JPMORGAN MORTGAGE TRUST 2008-R2 ) MORTGAGE PASS-THROUGH ) CERTIFICATES SERIES 2008-R2 ) ) Defendant(s). ) ) ) ) // Case No.: C13-4249 SC JUDGE: Samuel Conti [PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING STIPULATED REQUEST FOR ORDER CONTINUING CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE PURSUANT TO CIVIL LOCAL RULE 6-2 Complaint filed: September 13, 2013 // 24 // 25 // 26 // 27 28 // // Burke v. JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A., et al. [Proposed] Order Granting Stipulated Request 1 1 2 3 Stipulated Request for Order continuing Case Management Conference Pursuant to Civil Local Rule 6-2 and accompanying Declaration of Good Cause, PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED. 4 5 6 Case Management Conference is continued to August 28, 2015 at 10:00 am. Parties shall file a joint case management statement no later than August 21, 2015. 7 8 19 Dated: June ___, 2015 ______________________________ United States District Judge Burke v. JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A., et al. [Proposed] Order Granting Stipulated Request 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?