WhatsApp Inc. v. Intercarrier Communications, LLC
Filing
103
STIPULATION AND ORDER re 102 STIPULATION WITH PROPOSED ORDER To Extend Deadline For Further Joint Case Management Statement filed by WhatsApp Inc. Signed by Judge Jon S. Tigar on November 4, 2014. (wsn, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/4/2014)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
DOUGLAS E. LUMISH, Bar No. 183863
doug.lumish@lw.com
RICHARD G. FRENKEL, Bar No. 204133
rick.frenkel@lw.com
NATASA PAJIC, Bar No. 268144
natasa.pajic@lw.com
KARAN S. DHADIALLA, Bar No. 296313
karan.dhadialla@lw.com
LATHAM & WATKINS LLP
140 Scott Drive
Menlo Park, CA 94025
Telephone: (650) 328-4600
Facsimile: (650) 463-2600
KYLE A. VIRGIEN, Bar No. 278747
kyle.virgien@lw.com
LATHAM & WATKINS LLP
505 Montgomery Street, Suite 2000
San Francisco, CA 94111-6538
Telephone: (415) 391-0600
Facsimile: (415) 395-8095
Attorneys for Plaintiff and Counter-Defendant
WHATSAPP INC.
14
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
15
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
16
SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION
17
WHATSAPP INC.,
18
Plaintiff and
Counter-Defendant
19
20
21
22
23
CASE NO. 3:13-CV-4272-JST
STIPULATION TO EXTEND DEADLINE
FOR FURTHER JOINT CASE
MANAGEMENT STATEMENT
v.
INTERCARRIER COMMUNICATIONS
LLC,
Defendant and
Counter-Plaintiff
24
25
26
27
28
STIPULATION TO EXTEND DEADLINE FOR
FURTHER JOINT CASE MANAGEMENT STATEMENT
CASE NO. 3:13-CV-4272-JST
1
2
3
4
5
WHEREAS the Court issued an order construing claims of U.S. Patent Nos. 6,985,748
and 8,483,729 on October 16, 2014.
WHEREAS the parties are in the process of meeting and conferring to determine the
effect of the Court’s October 16 order.
WHEREAS ICC has notified WhatsApp that it has preliminarily determined that it will
6
no longer assert claims 1, 3-5, 9, 12 and 17 of the ‘748 patent and claim 2 of the ‘729 patent,
7
while reserving the right to appeal the Court’s Claim Construction Order as to those claims at the
8
appropriate time.
9
10
11
WHEREAS ICC and WhatsApp are discussing various proposals relating to further case
management of the remaining claims of the patents-in-suit.
WHEREAS the parties anticipate that a short extension to the deadline to file the Further
12
Joint Case Management Statement will allow them to either agree on a proposed case schedule
13
or further reduce the issues for the Court to decide relating to further management of this case.
14
IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED, by and among the parties and their
15
respective counsel of record and with the permission of the Court, that the parties may file the
16
Further Joint Case Management Statement on or before November 7, 2014.
17
Respectfully submitted,
18
19
Dated: November 4, 2014
By: /s/ Richard G. Frenkel
Richard G. Frenkel
LATHAM & WATKINS LLP
Counsel for WhatsApp, Inc.
Dated: November 4, 2014
By: /s/ Timothy Devlin
Timothy Devlin
DEVLIN LAW FIRM LLC
Counsel for InterCarrier Communications, LLC
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
1
STIPULATION TO EXTEND DEADLINE FOR
FURTHER JOINT CASE MANAGEMENT STATEMENT
CASE NO. 3:13-CV-4272-JST
1
FILER’S ATTESTATION
2
Pursuant to Civil Local Rule 5-1(i)(3), Richard G. Frenkel hereby attests that the
3
concurrence in the filing of this document has been obtained from the other signatories, which
4
shall serve in lieu of their signatures.
5
6
7
By: /s/ Richard G. Frenkel
Richard G. Frenkel
LATHAM & WATKINS LLP
Counsel for WhatsApp, Inc.
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
STIPULATION TO EXTEND DEADLINE FOR
FURTHER JOINT CASE MANAGEMENT STATEMENT
CASE NO. 3:13-CV-4272-JST
1
PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED.
10
ER
R NIA
S . Ti ga r
FO
n
J u d ge J o
H
9
RT
8
NO
7
DERED
O OR
_______________________
IT IS S
The Honorable Jon S. Tigar
United States District Judge
LI
6
UNIT
ED
5
November 4, 2014
Dated: ___________________
S DISTRICT
TE
C
TA
RT
U
O
4
S
3
A
2
ORDER
N
F
D IS T IC T O
R
C
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
STIPULATION TO EXTEND DEADLINE FOR
FURTHER JOINT CASE MANAGEMENT STATEMENT
CASE NO. 3:13-CV-4272-JST
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?